linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Catalin,

Today's linux-next merge of the kmemleak tree got a conflict in
init/main.c between commit b9ce08c01020eb28bfbfa6faf1c740281c5f418e
("kmemtrace: Core implementation") from the ftrace tree and commit
faff141a1eb4e690c0c54ab8684f8b267bc116c5 ("kmemleak: Add the base
support") from the kmemleak tree.

Trivial overlapping additions.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry
the fix as necessary.  The only doubt in my mind was the ordering of
these calls.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

diff --cc init/main.c
index ff3d580,c7f81aa..0000000
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@@ -650,7 -643,7 +652,8 @@@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(voi
  	enable_debug_pagealloc();
  	cpu_hotplug_init();
  	kmem_cache_init();
 +	kmemtrace_init();
+ 	kmemleak_init();
  	debug_objects_mem_init();
  	idr_init_cache();
  	setup_per_cpu_pageset();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux