Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:19:31 +1100
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090119151653.GJ15170@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20090115103028.44016344.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090119151653.GJ15170@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Bruce,

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:16:53 -0500 "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Apologies; those should be back up now.

Yep, thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp92kkvre4O2.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
  - From: Stephen Rothwell
- Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
  - From: J. Bruce Fields

Prev by Date: Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
Next by Date: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST)
Previous by thread: Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
Next by thread: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux