* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:45:39PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote: > > > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2): > > > > Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h > > > > make linux/types.h as assembly safe > > > > > > I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch. > > > > But have not replied to my mail about that so far. > > Sigh. No I didn't - because I also got a reply from Jaswinder and > covered all points in _that_ reply. > > Would you like me to re-send my reply so that you can appear in the To: > header? > > Stop making this discussion stupidly obtuse. I am not making anything stupidly obtuse, your reply to Jaswinder was in a different (but related) portion of the thread, that i have not read yet at that point. I have read it now and have replied. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
