On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 20:52 +0000, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Note that requiring kmemleak to be freezable looks only relevant if it does > some memory allocations (hibernation needs some memory and prefer that there > are not too much parallel memory allocations.) OK. In this case, there is no need for the kmemleak thread to be freezable. It only scans the memory periodically but doesn't allocate any itself. Thanks. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html