On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > > IMA_LSM_RULES requires AUDIT. This is automatic if SECURITY_SELINUX=y > but not when SECURITY_SMACK=y (and SECURITY_SELINUX=n), so make the > dependency explicit. This fixes the following build error: > > security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:111:error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_match' > security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:230:error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_init' > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> Applied to git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next > --- > security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- linux-next-20090212.orig/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig > +++ linux-next-20090212/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ config IMA_AUDIT > > config IMA_LSM_RULES > bool > - depends on IMA && (SECURITY_SELINUX || SECURITY_SMACK) > + depends on IMA && AUDIT && (SECURITY_SELINUX || SECURITY_SMACK) > default y > help > - Disabling this option will disregard LSM based policy rules > + Disabling this option will disregard LSM based policy rules. > -- James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html