Linux Real Time Users
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [PATCH 1/2] powerpc - Separate the irq radix tree insertion and lookup
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2 V4] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.26.3-rt5
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc - Separate the irq radix tree insertion and lookup
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.26.3-rt4
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RT PATCH v4] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RT PATCH v3] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RT PATCH v3] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Question regarding sched_setaffinity
- From: "Karthik Singaram Lakshmanan" <karthiksingaram@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt3 bug report
- From: Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RT PATCH v2] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RT PATCH v2] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RT PATCH v2] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RT PATCH v2] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RT PATCH v2] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RT PATCH v2] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ RT PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] seqlock: serialize against writers
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt3 bug report
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: mark gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: mark gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Availability rt patch for older linux kernel 2.6.11.3
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: pull only one task during NEWIDLE balancing to limit critical section
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: pull only one task during NEWIDLE balancing to limit critical section
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Series short description
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: pull only one task during NEWIDLE balancing to limit critical section
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: misc rt fixes for tip/sched/devel (was: Series short description)
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 6/6] sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/6] plist: fix PLIST_NODE_INIT to work with debug enabled
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/6] sched: add sched_class->needs_post_schedule() member
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/6] sched: pull only one task during NEWIDLE balancing to limit critical section
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/6] Series short description
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/6] sched: only try to push a task on wakeup if it is migratable
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: mark gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: pull only one task during NEWIDLE balancing to limit critical section
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Subject: x86: Move crashkernel reservation before dma32_reserve_bootmem()
- From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: pull only one task during NEWIDLE balancing to limit critical section
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt3 bug report
- From: Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt3 bug report
- From: Jon Masters <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt3 bug report
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] sched: create "pushable_tasks" list to limit pushing to one attempt
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] sched: add sched_class->needs_post_schedule() member
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] sched: make double-lock-balance fair
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] sched: pull only one task during NEWIDLE balancing to limit critical section
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] sched: only try to push a task on wakeup if it is migratable
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] sched: misc rt fixes for tip/sched/devel
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: mark gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RT] hrtimers stuck in waitqueue
- From: Gilles Carry <Gilles.Carry@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Subject: x86: Move crashkernel reservation before dma32_reserve_bootmem()
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Availability rt patch for older linux kernel 2.6.11.3
- From: robert <robje99@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.26.3-rt3 bug report
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt3
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt3
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt3
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt3
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.26.3-rt3
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT RFC v4 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RT] hrtimers stuck in waitqueue
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT RFC v4 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT RFC v4 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT RFC v4 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: "Esben Nielsen" <nielsen.esben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RT] hrtimer __run_hrtimer code cleanup
- From: Gilles Carry <glscarry@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RT] hrtimers stuck in waitqueue
- From: Gilles Carry <glscarry@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt2
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt2
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt2
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26.3-rt2
- From: "Javier Sanz" <jsanza@xxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.26.3-rt2
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RT] hrtimers stuck in waitqueue
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RT] hrtimer __run_hrtimer code cleanup
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Motherboard chipset advise needed.
- From: "Denis Borisevich" <dennisfen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RT] hrtimer __run_hrtimer code cleanup
- From: Gilles Carry <glscarry@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RT] hrtimer __run_hrtimer code cleanup
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: mark gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] rt Kconfig.preempt fixes
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] rt Kconfig.preempt fixes
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RT] hrtimers stuck in waitqueue
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc - Separate the irq radix tree insertion and lookup
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Patches to drop from the next RT series
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Review comments/questions on preempt-irqs-i386.patch
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RT] hrtimers stuck in waitqueue
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT 2/2] ftrace: fix elevated preempt_count in wakeup-tracer
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT 2/2] ftrace: fix elevated preempt_count in wakeup-tracer
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT 2/2] ftrace: fix elevated preempt_count in wakeup-tracer
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT 2/2] ftrace: fix elevated preempt_count in wakeup-tracer
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT 2/2] ftrace: fix elevated preempt_count in wakeup-tracer
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT 1/2] seqlock: make sure that raw_seqlock_t retries readers while writes are pending
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT 0/2] Misc fixes for 2.6.26-rt1
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT RFC v4 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AW: [PATCH RT RFC v4 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] [RT] hrtimers stuck in waitqueue
- From: Gilles Carry <gilles.carry@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] [RT] hrtimer __run_hrtimer code cleanup
- From: Gilles Carry <gilles.carry@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2][RT] hrtimers stuck in waitqueue
- From: Gilles Carry <gilles.carry@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT RFC v4 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- AW: [PATCH RT RFC v4 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: "Matthias Behr" <linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- ARM RT - "scheduling with irqs disabled" can occur when a break point is set
- From: Jim Barlow <jbarlow@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT RFC v4 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v4 8/8] rtmutex: pi-boost locks as late as possible
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v4 7/8] rtmutex: convert rtmutexes to fully use the PI library
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v4 6/8] rtmutex: use runtime init for rtmutexes
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v4 5/8] RT: wrap the rt_rwlock "add reader" logic
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v4 4/8] rtmutex: formally initialize the rt_mutex_waiters
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v4 3/8] sched: rework task reference counting to work with the pi infrastructure
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v4 2/8] sched: add the basic PI infrastructure to the task_struct
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v4 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v4 0/8] Priority Inheritance enhancements
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Compile problems in locking-selftest.c with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT] fix flags in usb code
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT] infiniband: change flags from int to long
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v3] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v2 6/8] rtmutex: use runtime init for rtmutexes
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v2 0/8] Priority Inheritance enhancements
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v2 5/8] RT: wrap the rt_rwlock "add reader" logic
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v2 3/8] sched: rework task reference counting to work with the pi infrastructure
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v2 2/8] sched: add the basic PI infrastructure to the task_struct
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v2 8/8] rtmutex: pi-boost locks as late as possible
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v2 7/8] rtmutex: convert rtmutexes to fully use the PI library
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v2 1/8] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC v2 4/8] rtmutex: formally initialize the rt_mutex_waiters
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: mark gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] rt: shorten posix_cpu_timers/<CPU> kernel thread names
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26-rt1
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26-rt1
- From: Juergen Beisert <jbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.26-rt1 : trying to register non-static key.
- From: Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: mark gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- LPPTEST-worst-case latency
- From: Kushal Koolwal <kushalkoolwal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: caller is __qdisc_run
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: caller is __qdisc_run
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: caller is __qdisc_run
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: caller is __qdisc_run
- From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: caller is __qdisc_run
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- LPPTEST-worst-case latency
- From: Kushal Koolwal <kushalkoolwal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Cyclictest usage
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: caller is __qdisc_run
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Cyclictest usage
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Cyclictest usage
- From: "Tobias Knutsson" <tobias.knutsson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26-rt1
- From: Juergen Beisert <jbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix typo in pi_stress manpage
- From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Avoid to remove too much files
- From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH][PPC64][RT] Fix a previously reverted fix again
- From: Chirag Jog <chirag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Preempt-RT with Linux 2.6.20 for Arch ppc
- From: "Christian Volk" <linux.kernel@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] powerpc - Separate the irq radix tree insertion and lookup
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2 V3] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- tracing WARN_ON in rt kernel
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Newbie: LPPTEST script question
- From: Kushal Koolwal <kushalkoolwal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: mark gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT RFC 7/7] rtmutex: pi-boost locks as late as possible
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7 Bugs
- From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC] pm_qos_requirement might sleep
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] powerpc - Separate the irq radix tree insertion and lookup
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3 V2] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT RFC 7/7] rtmutex: pi-boost locks as late as possible
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7 Bugs
- From: Matthew Smith <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can't boot 2.6.26-rt1
- From: "Justin Mattock" <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can't boot 2.6.26-rt1
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can't boot 2.6.26-rt1
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Can't boot 2.6.26-rt1
- From: "Justin Mattock" <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
- Can't boot 2.6.26-rt1
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: newbie, rt programming and concepts books, training
- From: Alejandro Mery <amery@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- newbie, rt programming and concepts books, training
- From: "Javier Sanz" <jsanza@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC 7/7] rtmutex: pi-boost locks as late as possible
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC 6/7] rtmutex: convert rtmutexes to fully use the PI library
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC 5/7] rtmutex: use runtime init for rtmutexes
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC 4/7] RT: wrap the rt_rwlock "add reader" logic
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC 3/7] rtmutex: formally initialize the rt_mutex_waiters
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC 2/7] sched: add the basic PI infrastructure to the task_struct
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC 1/7] add generalized priority-inheritance interface
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT RFC 0/7] Priority Inheritance enhancements
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -rt] apply rcu_process_callbacks() changes from mainline
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26-rt1
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26-rt1
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] rt Kconfig.preempt fixes
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7 Bugs
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.25.8-rt7 Bugs
- From: Matthew Smith <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] powerpc - Initialize the irq radix tree earlier
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] powerpc - Separate the irq radix tree insertion and lookup
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: Jürgen Mell <j.mell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix Bug messages
- From: Chirag Jog <chirag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26-rt1
- From: "Ryan Hope" <rmh3093@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26-rt1
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.26-rt1
- From: Jürgen Mell <j.mell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.26-rt1
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt16
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: PCI: MSI interrupts masked using prohibited method
- From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: Questions About preempt-rt and arch:ppc
- From: "Christian Volk" <linux.kernel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt16
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: PCI: MSI interrupts masked using prohibited method
- From: Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt16
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt16
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt16
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt16
- From: "Avuton Olrich" <avuton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Questions About preempt-rt and arch:ppc
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt16
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt15
- From: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt15
- From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt15
- From: Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt15
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt15
- From: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt15
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2][RT] powerpc - fix bug in irq reverse mapping radix tree
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2][RT] powerpc - Make the irq reverse mapping radix tree lockless
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2][RT] powerpc - XICS: move the call to irq_radix_revmap from xics_startup to xics_host_map
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2][RT] powerpc - fix bug in irq reverse mapping radix tree (Resend)
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2][RT] powerpc - fix bug in irq reverse mapping radix tree
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: remove extraneous load manipulations
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
- From: Chirag Jog <chirag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Questions About preempt-rt and arch:ppc
- From: "Christian Volk" <linux.kernel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: readjust the load whenever task_setprio()is invoked
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: remove extraneous load manipulations
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: readjust the load whenever task_setprio() is invoked
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: remove extraneous load manipulations
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
- From: Chirag Jog <chirag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
- From: Chirag Jog <chirag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix typo in pi_stress manpage
- From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Differentiate hyphen and minus in manpages
- From: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: rt for 2.6.26?
- From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.X-rtX compile errors on ARM due to cmpxchg() problems.
- From: "Remy Bohmer" <linux@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: rt for 2.6.26?
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- rt for 2.6.26?
- From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT] rwlock: be more conservative in locking reader_lock_count
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Real time linux on my project
- From: Henrik Austad <henrikau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Real time linux on my project
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Real time linux on my project
- From: Luis <lquirosr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Actually call function pointer in ftrace_stop
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ftrace: Actually call function pointer in ftrace_stop
- From: Josh Triplett <josht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix SCHED_FIFO spec violation (backport)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix SCHED_FIFO spec violation (backport)
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix SCHED_FIFO spec violation (backport)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix a previously reverted "fix"
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix a previously reverted "fix"
- From: Chirag Jog <chirag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2.6.24.7-rt14 v2] rt: {queue,schedule}_work_prio() allowing work priorities other than caller's priority
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH][RT][PPC64] Fix preempt unsafe paths accessing per_cpu variables
- From: Chirag Jog <chirag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Luotao Fu <l.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: add mlockall option to cyclictest, et al
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Luotao Fu <l.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Luotao Fu <l.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: add mlockall option to cyclictest, et al
- From: Daniel Gollub <dgollub@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix SCHED_FIFO spec violation (backport)
- From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix SCHED_FIFO spec violation (backport)
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix the processing of optional options for cyclictest
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ARM PXA255 build error and hundreds warnings
- From: GSE <guillaume.sempe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix SCHED_FIFO spec violation (backport)
- From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -rt] [resend as inlined patch] {queue,schedule}_work_prio() allowing work priorities other than caller's priority
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2.6.24.7-rt14 v2] rt: {queue,schedule}_work_prio() allowing work priorities other than caller's priority
- From: leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx
- [test - ignore] kernel patch submission script using msmtp/gmail
- From: leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx
- [test - ignore] kernel patch submission script using msmtp/gmail
- From: leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH -rt] [resend as inlined patch] {queue,schedule}_work_prio() allowing work priorities other than caller's priority
- From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -rt] [resend as inlined patch] {queue,schedule}_work_prio() allowing work priorities other than caller's priority
- From: Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix SCHED_FIFO spec violation (backport)
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH] fix SCHED_FIFO spec violation (backport)
- From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] sched: readjust the load whenever task_setprio() is invoked
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] sched: remove extraneous load manipulations
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] sched: misc fixes for stable-25.y and 25-rt
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Get RT-linux working on a Routerboard 532
- From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: New LTP test feature [Hard Real Time Linux Testing]
- From: Subrata Modak <subrata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Not so RT Linux
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Get RT-linux working on a Routerboard 532
- From: Jean Collas <jean.collas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Delayed interrupt work, thread pools
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Delayed interrupt work, thread pools
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Not so RT Linux
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Not so RT Linux
- From: "Tobias Knutsson" <tobias.knutsson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Luotao Fu <l.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Get RT-linux working on a Routerboard 532
- From: Jean Collas <jean.collas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG RT] 2.6.25.8-rt7 on 8-way
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG RT] 2.6.25.8-rt7 on 8-way
- From: "Noah Watkins" <noahwatkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc8-rt1: Strange latencies on mpc5200 powerpc - RCU issue?
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: High latencies with linux-2.6.25.4-rt6 on MPC5200
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -rt] Add schedule_work_prio() and queue_work_prio().
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -rt] {queue,schedule}_work_prio() allowing work priorities other than caller's priority
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -rt] Add schedule_work_prio() and queue_work_prio().
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG RT] 2.6.25.8-rt7 on 8-way
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -rt] Add schedule_work_prio() and queue_work_prio().
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: High latencies with linux-2.6.25.4-rt6 on MPC5200
- From: Luotao Fu <l.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: High latencies with linux-2.6.25.4-rt6 on MPC5200
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: High latencies with linux-2.6.25.4-rt6 on MPC5200
- From: Luotao Fu <l.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG RT] 2.6.25.8-rt7 on 8-way
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG RT] 2.6.25.8-rt7 on 8-way
- From: "Noah Watkins" <noahwatkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG RT] 2.6.25.8-rt7 on 8-way
- From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG RT] 2.6.25.8-rt7 on 8-way
- From: "Noah Watkins" <noahwatkins@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: High latencies with linux-2.6.25.4-rt6 on MPC5200
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -rt] Add schedule_work_prio() and queue_work_prio().
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt14
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt14
- From: trem <tremyfr@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] sched: add avg-overlap support to RT tasks
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock during newidle balancing
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] sched: newidle and RT wake-buddy fixes
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix the processing of optional options for cyclictest
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix the processing of optional options for cyclictest
- From: Clark Williams <clark.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix the processing of optional options for cyclictest
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Fix the processing of optional options for cyclictest
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: High latencies with linux-2.6.25.4-rt6 on MPC5200
- From: Luotao Fu <l.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Fix the processing of optional options for cyclictest
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- ftrace help for NYSE
- From: Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RT] remove_waiter does not need to do chain walk?(2.6.25.4-rt)
- From: hyl <heyongli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [LTP] 2.6.25.4-rt4
- From: Subrata Modak <subrata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: limit "all_pinned" balance attempts to sd->span
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once atleastone task has moved over
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once atleastone task has moved over
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7
- From: Juergen Beisert <jbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7
- From: Juergen Beisert <jbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <GHaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.8-rt7
- From: Juergen Beisert <jbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] sched: limit "all_pinned" balance attempts to sd->span
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock during newidle balancing
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements v2
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] sched: limit "all_pinned" balance attempts to sd->span
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements v2
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at leastone task has moved over
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at leastone task has moved over
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lockduringnewidle balancing
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock duringnewidle balancing
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock duringnewidle balancing
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: only run newidle if previous task was CFS
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock during newidle balancing
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched: only run newidle if previous task was CFS
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RT] remove_waiter does not need to do chain walk?(2.6.25.4-rt)
- From: hyl <heyongli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.25.8-rt7
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock during newidle balancing
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] sched: terminate newidle balancing once at least one task has moved over
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] sched: only run newidle if previous task was CFS
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock during newidle balancing
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] RT: scheduler newidle enhancements
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt14
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: locking_selftest triggers WARN_ON by exceeding MAX_RWLOCK_DEPTH
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- locking_selftest triggers WARN_ON by exceeding MAX_RWLOCK_DEPTH
- From: Josh Triplett <josht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: High latencies with linux-2.6.25.4-rt6 on MPC5200
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OOPS] RT kernel on PowerPC
- From: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: High latencies with linux-2.6.25.4-rt6 on MPC5200
- From: Luotao Fu <l.fu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [OOPS] RT kernel on PowerPC
- From: Chirag Jog <chirag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- High latencies with linux-2.6.25.4-rt6 on MPC5200
- From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: cyclictest - trouble explaning results
- From: "Jens Wirth" <jewirth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Marin Mitov <mitov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cyclictest -t NUM argument not honoured [PATCH]
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cyclictest -t NUM argument not honoured [PATCH]
- From: "John Kacur" <jkacur@xxxxxxxxx>
- cyclictest -t NUM argument not honoured
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c
- From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cyclictest - trouble explaning results
- From: Jens Wirth <jewirth@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c
- From: ciaby <ciaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MPC5200B: -rt11/-rt12 network problems
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cyclictest - trouble explaning results
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cyclictest - trouble explaning results
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cyclictest - trouble explaning results
- From: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@xxxxxxxx>
- cyclictest - trouble explaning results
- From: "Oleg Galimov" <Galimov@xxxxxx>
- linux v2.6.25.6.cpuisol1
- From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Disable tracing when current_tracer is set to "none"
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c
- From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Marin Mitov <mitov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c
- From: Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c
- From: ciaby <ciaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] 2.6.25.4-rt6: missing global_rt_runtime() in sched.c
- From: ciaby <ciaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt13 Oops
- From: Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Disable tracing when current_tracer is set to "none"
- From: Ankita Garg <ankita@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt6
- From: "Uli Brueggemann" <uli.brueggemann@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt6
- From: Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt13 Oops
- From: "Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@xxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt13 Oops
- From: Mark Hounschell <dmarkh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.25.4-rt6
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt13
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: about 2.6.25.4-rt5 (missing global_rt_runtime)
- From: ciaby <ciaby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: fix cpupri priocount
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH 2/2] sched: fix cpupri priocount
- From: "Rune Torgersen" <runet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: fix cpupri priocount
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.25.4-rt5
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] sched: fix cpupri priocount
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] sched: fix cpupri hotplug support
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] sched: hotplug and cpupri fixes (v2)
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- MPC5200B: -rt11/-rt12 network problems
- From: "Daniel Schnell" <daniel.schnell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: fix cpupri hotplug support
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: fix cpupri hotplug support
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: fix cpupri hotplug support
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: OMAP: remove unnecessary locking in clk_get_rate()
- From: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] sched: fix cpupri hotplug support
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH - cyclictest] sched_switch not sched-switch
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH - cyclictest] handle latest ftrace
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH - cyclictest ] search for debugfs
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt4
- From: Subrata Modak <subrata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt12 WARNING: at kernel/fork.c:1055 copy_process() == DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!p->hardirqs_enabled);
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt12
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- re: [LTP] [ANNOUNCE] The Linux Test Project has been Released for MAY 2008
- From: Guillaume FORTAINE <gui.fortaine@xxxxxxxxx>
- [LTP] [ANNOUNCE] The Linux Test Project has been Released for MAY 2008
- From: Subrata Modak <subrata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Breaking out of pthread_mutex_lock
- From: Gilles Carry <Gilles.Carry@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Marin Mitov <mitov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH][resubmit] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Marin Mitov <mitov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt4
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt4
- From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Breaking out of pthread_mutex_lock
- From: Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Breaking out of pthread_mutex_lock
- From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Different kernel and RT versions
- From: "Remy Bohmer" <linux@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Breaking out of pthread_mutex_lock
- From: Gilles Carry <Gilles.Carry@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt4
- From: Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Different kernel and RT versions
- From: "Uli Brueggemann" <uli.brueggemann@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Breaking out of pthread_mutex_lock
- From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Breaking out of pthread_mutex_lock
- From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Different kernel and RT versions
- From: "Remy Bohmer" <linux@xxxxxxxxxx>
- problem compiling 2.6.25.4-rt4 x86
- From: "Javier Sanz" <jsanza@xxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.25.4-rt4
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Different kernel and RT versions
- From: "Uli Brueggemann" <uli.brueggemann@xxxxxxxxx>
- Test results 2.6.25.4-rt3 on Freescale MPC8315E @ 400 MHz
- From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- Real Time Group scheduling
- From: Subrata Modak <subrata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt11
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] sched: prioritize non-migratable tasks over migratable ones
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] sched: fix SCHED_FAIR wake-idle logic error
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] sched: fix RT task-wakeup logic
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] sched: misc sched-devel fixes for PREEMPT_RT
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -rt] fix sysrq+l when nmi_watchdog disabled
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -rt] fix sysrq+l when nmi_watchdog disabled
- From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RT] remove user_trace_stop
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -v4] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Marin Mitov <mitov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re:[PATCH -v4] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: add mlockall option to cyclictest, et al
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -v4] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -v3] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -v3] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -v2] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -v2] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt10
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] x86: enable preemption in delay
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt10
- From: trem <tremyfr@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -rt] fix for compiling 2.6.24.7-rt10 without CONFIG_FTRACE
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -rt] fix for compiling 2.6.24.7-rt10 without CONFIG_FTRACE
- From: Clark Williams <clark.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] remove the extra call to try_to_take_lock
- From: "Peter W. Morreale" <pmorreale@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT] remove user_trace_stop
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt10
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] remove the extra call to try_to_take_lock
- From: "Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] remove the extra call to try_to_take_lock
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -rt] gitignore scripts/testlpp
- From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -rt] gitignore Module.markers
- From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT on Blackfin (nommu embedded world)?
- From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [LTP] [Fwd: [PATCH 1/1] [REALTIME] Profiled tests.]
- From: Subrata Modak <subrata@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT on Blackfin (nommu embedded world)?
- From: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT on Blackfin (nommu embedded world)?
- From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT on Blackfin (nommu embedded world)?
- From: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RT] rwlocks fix for non PREEMPT_RT
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compile warning rtmutex code on 2.6.24.7-rt8 (CC:LKML added)
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compile warning rtmutex code on 2.6.24.7-rt8 (CC:LKML added)
- From: "Remy Bohmer" <linux@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How to enable CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT on Blackfin (nommu embedded world)?
- From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt8
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt8
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.24.7-rt8
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt9
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] RT: Misc. fixups for ARM/OMAP against 2.6.25.4-rt3
- From: "Luís Vitório Cargnini" <lvcargnini@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] RT: ARM: remove __attribute_used__ from semaphore code
- From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH 4/5] RT: ARM: disable duplicate cmpxchg
- From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] RT: wrap BUILD_CHECK_IRQ_FLAGS
- From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] RT: ARM: disable duplicate cmpxchg
- From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] RT: ARM: remove non-existant trace_preempt_*_idle calls from idle loop
- From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] ARM: OMAP: remove unnecessary locking in clk_get_rate()
- From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] RT: Misc. fixups for ARM/OMAP against 2.6.25.4-rt3
- From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with RT pathc s in OMAP kernel
- From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compile warning rtmutex code on 2.6.24.7-rt8 (CC:LKML added)
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compile warning rtmutex code on 2.6.24.7-rt8 (CC:LKML added)
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Compile warning rtmutex code on 2.6.24.7-rt8 (CC:LKML added)
- From: "Remy Bohmer" <linux@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Compile bug in 2.6.24.8-rt7 on ARM
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Compile bug in 2.6.24.8-rt7 on ARM
- From: "Remy Bohmer" <linux@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] msi: skip calling pci_find_capability from msi_set_mask_bits
- From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] msi: skip calling pci_find_capability from msi_set_mask_bits
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.25.4-rt3
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2 compile errors on ARM due to cmpxchg() problems.
- From: "Remy Bohmer" <linux@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2 compile errors on ARM due to cmpxchg() problems.
- From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt1 problem
- From: Tim Blechmann <tim@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] remove the extra call to try_to_take_lock
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] adjust pi_lock usage in wakeup
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] rtmutex: use task->oncpu to save a call
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] sched: make task->oncpu available in all configurations
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] optimize rt lock wakeup
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] RT: adaptive-lock enhancements
- From: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Problems with RT pathc s in OMAP kernel
- From: "Luís Vitório Cargnini" <lvcargnini@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2 compile errors on ARM due to cmpxchg() problems.
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.25.4-rt2 compile errors on ARM due to cmpxchg() problems.
- From: "Remy Bohmer" <linux@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: "MA QING A" <Qing.a.Ma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.24.7-rt8
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: "MA QING A" <Qing.a.Ma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Dragan Noveski <perodog@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Dragan Noveski <perodog@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Dragan Noveski <perodog@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.25.4-rt2
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[RT Stable]
[Kernel Announce]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Bugtraq]