Thanks Carsten, for your informations, > All 2.6.26 related rt-patches are experimental. In fact, it would be > better to call them 2.6.26.3-rtrc3 to indicate that this is, at best, a > release candidate - but no release. As I am these days interested in rt patches I can provide you more info on my attempts to bring a functional rt 2.6.26 kernel. I usually log my compilation results and try to find usefull info (just recompiled kernel with full ACPI support with the rt7 patch, although I guess I will obtain the same results). I am not an expert but I have some background knowledge of linux system as a user. If you give me info or documentation to read for tests or debugging purpose, I am ready to help you at the moment, if I able to. > > Our "Latest Stable" is 2.6.24.7-rt17 > (http://www.osadl.org/Latest-Stable.latest-stable-realtime-linux.0.html). > Can't you use this one? If this kernel has the problem you are > experiencing, we are certainly interested to fix it. > As first of all I need a stable kernel for a dual core on the box an impatient friend, I'll use 2.6.24.7-rt17 as your advise suggests, and tell you in case I get trouble with it. Regards, Xavier Droubay. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
