Hello Gautam, On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Gautam Thaker <gautam.h.thaker@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I recently started to study how nanosleep() behaves under 2.6.26.6-rt11 > compiled in in FULL PREEMPT, uniprocessor mode. I find that between > 2.6.20-rt8 and this new kernel something has changed and nanosleep() is back > to its old behavior or sleeping for next higher number of msec rather than > carefully following the "y=x" line. > > I don't follow the RT world closely enough, but is this a regression or an > expected change in behavior? The link below show the results very clearly. > > http://www.atl.external.lmco.com/projects/QoS/documents/nanosleep_1.png > This suggests (to me) that you probably did not enable HRTIMERS? Regards, -- Leon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
