few question about the platform tested and in use with config_preempt_rt...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

I have few questions regarding the platform tested with the config_preempt_rt:

1. When was last time the table at <http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch> updated?

2. Was the worse case latency measured under stress? If so which stress test was used? 

3. What kind of network tests has been used? Does the worse case latency valid for network application (RT low latency audio streaming)?

3. Were there any additional hardware tweaking done on the tested system (e.g. bios option tweaking such as turning off fan control)?

4. Were there any additional kernel option tweaking done, e.g. - clock source, tick-less kernel?

5. Which kernel modules were loaded on the measured system (USB module, keyboard controller, Ethernet driver etc...)?

6. What bios version was used? Was it the latest version?

7. Could you share the contents of /proc/interrupts file of the tested system?

Thanks,
Amir.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux