Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: make double-lock-balance fair

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:41:08PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>   
>   
>> Does it make sense to make this _double_lock_balance() thing depend on
>> that too?
>>     
>
> Hmm, you might have a good point there. Greg?
>   

This makes sense to me.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux