* Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:43:44 +0100 (CET)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > After a 1.5 years sabbatical from preempt-rt we are pleased to
> > announce a refactored preempt-rt patch against linux-2.6.29-rc4.
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I got the following after booting on my T60:
>
> - ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at crypto/blkcipher.c:327 blkcipher_walk_first+0x72/0x1aa()
> Hardware name:
> Modules linked in: fuse i915 drm i2c_algo_bit cfbcopyarea cfbimgblt cfbfillrect autofs4 coretemp sunrpc nf_conntrack_netbios_ns xt_state ipt_REJECT iptable_filter ip_tables cpufreq_ondemand dm_multipath scsi_dh uinput btusb bluetooth sg snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec iwl3945 snd_hwdep e1000e lib80211 snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss video snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 i2c_core thinkpad_acpi rfkill output iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support button joydev hwmon dm_snapshot dm_zero dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd [last unloaded: microcode]
> Pid: 9, comm: sirq-tasklet/0 Not tainted 2.6.29-rc4-rt1-tip #50
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8023bd23>] warn_slowpath+0xaf/0xd6
> [<ffffffff8035d176>] blkcipher_walk_first+0x72/0x1aa
> [<ffffffff802309cb>] ? enqueue_task_fair+0x25/0x68
> [<ffffffff8035d2f6>] blkcipher_walk_virt+0x1a/0x1c
> [<ffffffff803620af>] crypto_ecb_crypt+0x2b/0x9a
> [<ffffffff80359d20>] ? setkey+0xc4/0xd8
> [<ffffffff8036426a>] ? arc4_crypt+0x0/0x5e
> [<ffffffff8036214f>] crypto_ecb_decrypt+0x31/0x33
> [<ffffffff8035c8fb>] ? setkey+0xba/0xcd
> [<ffffffff8022bf8f>] ? __wake_up_common+0x49/0x7f
> [<ffffffff80519beb>] ieee80211_wep_decrypt_data+0x5e/0x95
> [<ffffffff80519d3a>] ieee80211_wep_decrypt+0x118/0x16f
> [<ffffffff80519ddc>] ieee80211_crypto_wep_decrypt+0x4b/0x93
> [<ffffffff80524d8f>] ieee80211_invoke_rx_handlers+0x26b/0x1395
> [<ffffffff8021ce0f>] ? native_smp_send_reschedule+0x59/0x5b
> [<ffffffff8022c699>] ? resched_task+0x60/0x62
> [<ffffffff802367a9>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x352/0x364
> [<ffffffff802367ca>] ? default_wake_function+0xf/0x11
> [<ffffffff80526418>] __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet+0x55f/0x59c
> [<ffffffff80526c82>] __ieee80211_rx+0x508/0x572
> [<ffffffff80517451>] ieee80211_tasklet_handler+0x6d/0xff
> [<ffffffff80241192>] __tasklet_action+0xa1/0x112
> [<ffffffff80241277>] tasklet_action+0x39/0x3b
> [<ffffffff80240eef>] ksoftirqd+0x162/0x278
> [<ffffffff80240d8d>] ? ksoftirqd+0x0/0x278
> [<ffffffff80240d8d>] ? ksoftirqd+0x0/0x278
> [<ffffffff8024f5ce>] kthread+0x48/0x73
> [<ffffffff8020cf6a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [<ffffffff8024f586>] ? kthread+0x0/0x73
> [<ffffffff8020cf60>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> - ---[ end trace b6a0ff9dfe960c5e ]---
>
> It booted to runlevel 5, brought up GDM, I logged in and XFCE came up
> fine. It wasn't until NetworkManager started dorking around with the
> 802.11 adapter and started doing WEP things that I got the above
> warning. Right after I got this, NetworkManager connected and the
> system locked up. Sorry, no traceback from the panic.
>
> I haven't gone far in looking at this, but it looks like we might have
> to adjust expectations in the crypto code, since it's probably ok to
> be in_irq() in this case, since we're actually in a kthread.
no, removing the warning would just hide the real bug.
Could you try the fix below please?
Ingo
--------------------------------->
Subject: irq threading: fix PF_HARDIRQ definition
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Feb 12 09:29:14 CET 2009
Clark Williams reported the following warning:
WARNING: at crypto/blkcipher.c:327 blkcipher_walk_first+0x72/0x1aa()
[<ffffffff8035d176>] blkcipher_walk_first+0x72/0x1aa
[<ffffffff8035d2f6>] blkcipher_walk_virt+0x1a/0x1c
[<ffffffff803620af>] crypto_ecb_crypt+0x2b/0x9a
[<ffffffff8036214f>] crypto_ecb_decrypt+0x31/0x33
[<ffffffff80519beb>] ieee80211_wep_decrypt_data+0x5e/0x95
[<ffffffff80519d3a>] ieee80211_wep_decrypt+0x118/0x16f
[<ffffffff80519ddc>] ieee80211_crypto_wep_decrypt+0x4b/0x93
[<ffffffff80524d8f>] ieee80211_invoke_rx_handlers+0x26b/0x1395
[<ffffffff80526418>] __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet+0x55f/0x59c
[<ffffffff80526c82>] __ieee80211_rx+0x508/0x572
[<ffffffff80517451>] ieee80211_tasklet_handler+0x6d/0xff
[<ffffffff80241192>] __tasklet_action+0xa1/0x112
[<ffffffff80241277>] tasklet_action+0x39/0x3b
[<ffffffff80240eef>] ksoftirqd+0x162/0x278
Which comes from:
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq()))
return -EDEADLK;
This warning is surprising, as it clearly comes from a softirq
context.
The in_irq() definition looks like this on -rt:
#define in_irq() (hardirq_count() || (current->flags & PF_HARDIRQ))
hardirq_count() is correct, but looking at PF_HARDIRQ's definition in sched.h:
#define PF_EXITPIDONE 0x00000008 /* pi exit done on shut down */
#define PF_VCPU 0x00000010 /* I'm a virtual CPU */
#define PF_HARDIRQ 0x08000020 /* hardirq context */
#define PF_NOSCHED 0x00000020 /* Userspace does not expect scheduling */
#define PF_FORKNOEXEC 0x00000040 /* forked but didn't exec */
Reveals that due to a typo it not only overlaps the PF_NOSCHED bit, but
also has a spurious 0x08000000 component.
Move it to a free slot: 0x00000080.
Reported-by: Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: tip/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ tip/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1721,9 +1721,9 @@ extern cputime_t task_gtime(struct task_
#define PF_EXITING 0x00000004 /* getting shut down */
#define PF_EXITPIDONE 0x00000008 /* pi exit done on shut down */
#define PF_VCPU 0x00000010 /* I'm a virtual CPU */
-#define PF_HARDIRQ 0x08000020 /* hardirq context */
#define PF_NOSCHED 0x00000020 /* Userspace does not expect scheduling */
#define PF_FORKNOEXEC 0x00000040 /* forked but didn't exec */
+#define PF_HARDIRQ 0x00000080 /* hardirq context */
#define PF_SUPERPRIV 0x00000100 /* used super-user privileges */
#define PF_DUMPCORE 0x00000200 /* dumped core */
#define PF_SIGNALED 0x00000400 /* killed by a signal */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
