Re: [RT PATCH v2] seqlock: serialize against writers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gregory Haskins wrote:
> *Patch submitted for inclusion in PREEMPT_RT 26-rt4.  Applies to 2.6.26.3-rt3*
>
> Hi Ingo, Steven, Thomas,
>   Please consider for -rt4.  This fixes a nasty deadlock on my systems under
>   heavy load.
>
> [
> Changelog:
> 	v2: only touch seqlock_t because raw_seqlock_t doesn't require
> 	    serialization and userspace cannot modify data during a read
>
> 	v1: initial release
> ]
>   

Hi Andi,
  As it turns out, my distcc backend was an x86_64 machine running the
v1 patch and I started to notice sometime today that certain cc1 jobs
were sometimes (albeit rarely) segfaulting on me.  I noticed that before
I even published the first patch, but I chalked it up to a corrupt .o on
my NFS home.  Plus I was forgetting that the distcc machine was running
the patch, and I would probably have never made the userspace connection
had you not mentioned it.  In any case, I self-built this v2 patch with
v2 applied, and the segfaults have gone away.  So I think we know
several things:

1) You were right that this would cause an issue if the slow path is hit.
2) Steven was right that userspace must use raw_seqlock_t because it no
longer crashes with v2.
3) I am satisfied that my primary concern is still properly addressed.

Hopefully everyone is satisfied with this patch now.

Thanks for the help.  It's much appreciated!

-Greg


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux