RCU
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
From
: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v1 2/2] rcu/tree: Remove dynticks_nmi_nesting counter
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[RFC v1 2/2] rcu/tree: Remove dynticks_nmi_nesting counter
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Clean up dynticks counter usage
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[RFC v1 0/2] RCU dyntick nesting counter cleanups
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next + tools/memory-model] RCU and LKMM commits for 5.4
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
From
: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next + tools/memory-model] RCU and LKMM commits for 5.4
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next + tools/memory-model] RCU and LKMM commits for 5.4
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next + tools/memory-model] RCU and LKMM commits for 5.4
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
[GIT PULL rcu/next + tools/memory-model] RCU and LKMM commits for 5.4
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: don't include <linux/ktime.h> in rcutiny.h
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: don't include <linux/ktime.h> in rcutiny.h
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: don't include <linux/ktime.h> in rcutiny.h
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] rcu: don't include <linux/ktime.h> in rcutiny.h
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 1/3] rcu/tree: tick_dep_set/clear_cpu should accept bits instead of masks
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 1/3] rcu/tree: tick_dep_set/clear_cpu should accept bits instead of masks
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Scott Wood <swood@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 1/3] rcu/tree: tick_dep_set/clear_cpu should accept bits instead of masks
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 1/3] rcu/tree: tick_dep_set/clear_cpu should accept bits instead of masks
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 1/3] rcu/tree: tick_dep_set/clear_cpu should accept bits instead of masks
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 1/3] rcu/tree: tick_dep_set/clear_cpu should accept bits instead of masks
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[RFC v2] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[RFC] rcu/tree: Try to invoke_rcu_core() if in_irq() during unlock
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu/dev] Please squash: fixup! rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu/dev] Please squash: fixup! rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu/dev] Please squash: fixup! rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -rcu/dev] Please squash: fixup! rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [rcu:from-joel.2019.08.16a 143/172] kernel/rcu/tree.c:2808:6: note: in expansion of macro 'xchg'
From
: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [rcu:from-joel.2019.08.16a 143/172] kernel/rcu/tree.c:2808:6: note: in expansion of macro 'xchg'
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 1/3] rcu/tree: tick_dep_set/clear_cpu should accept bits instead of masks
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 1/3] rcu/tree: tick_dep_set/clear_cpu should accept bits instead of masks
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 -rcu dev 2/3] rcu/tree: Fix issue where sometimes rcu_urgent_qs is not set on IPI
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 -rcu] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 -rcu dev 2/3] rcu/tree: Fix issue where sometimes rcu_urgent_qs is not set on IPI
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 2/3] rcu/tree: Fix issue where sometimes rcu_urgent_qs is not set on IPI
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -rcu dev 2/3] rcu/tree: Fix issue where sometimes rcu_urgent_qs is not set on IPI
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -rcu dev 3/3] RFC: rcu/tree: Read dynticks_nmi_nesting in advance
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -rcu dev 1/3] rcu/tree: tick_dep_set/clear_cpu should accept bits instead of masks
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 -rcu] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 -rcu] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check
From
: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v3 -rcu] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2)
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2)
From
: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v4 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu() performance Tests
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [bug report] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[bug report] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
From
: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v3 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu performance Tests
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v3 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing, bug report
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
re: rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing, bug report
From
: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
From
: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
From
: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 14/16] include/linux: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h
From
: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 2/3] doc: Update documentation about list_for_each_entry_rcu (v1)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 2/3] doc: Update documentation about list_for_each_entry_rcu (v1)
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 2/3] doc: Update documentation about list_for_each_entry_rcu (v1)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 3/3] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu performance Tests
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2)
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 3/3] driver/core: Fix build error when SRCU and lockdep disabled
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 2/3] doc: Update documentation about list_for_each_entry_rcu (v1)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 1/3] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
need_heavy_qs flag for PREEMPT=y kernels
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu performance Tests
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu performance Tests
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu performance Tests
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/1] rcu: Remove unused variable rcu_perf_writer_state
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/1] rcu: Remove unused variable rcu_perf_writer_state
From
: Ethan Hansen <1ethanhansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu performance Tests
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu performance Tests
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
From
: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
From
: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu performance Tests
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC v1 2/2] rcuperf: Add kfree_rcu performance Tests
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC v1 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu batching
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Convert some RCU articles to ReST
From
: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu/nocb: Provide separate no-CBs grace-period kthreads
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu/nocb: Atomic ->len field in rcu_segcblist structure
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu/nocb: Atomic ->len field in rcu_segcblist structure
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu/nocb: Atomic ->len field in rcu_segcblist structure
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu/nocb: Atomic ->len field in rcu_segcblist structure
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu/nocb: Provide separate no-CBs grace-period kthreads
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu/nocb: Provide separate no-CBs grace-period kthreads
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/1] rcu: Remove unused function hlist_bl_del_init_rcu
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/1] rcu: Remove unused function hlist_bl_del_init_rcu
From
: Ethan Hansen <1ethanhansen@xxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/14] rcu/nocb: Reduce __call_rcu_nocb_wake() leaf rcu_node ->lock contention
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/14] rcu/nocb: Don't wake no-CBs GP kthread if timer posted under overload
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/14] rcu/nocb: Print no-CBs diagnostics when rcutorture writer unduly delayed
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/14] rcu: Allow rcu_do_batch() to dynamically adjust batch sizes
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/14] rcu/nocb: Avoid synchronous wakeup in __call_rcu_nocb_wake()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/14] EXP nohz: Add TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/14] rcu/nocb: EXP Check use and usefulness of ->nocb_lock_contended
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/14] rcu/nocb: Advance CBs after merge in rcutree_migrate_callbacks()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/14] rcu/nocb: Reduce nocb_cb_wait() leaf rcu_node ->lock contention
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu/nocb: Atomic ->len field in rcu_segcblist structure
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu/nohz: Make multi_cpu_stop() enable tick on all online CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/14] rcu/nohz: Force on tick when invoking lots of callbacks
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/14] No-CBs bypass addition for v5.4
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcutorture: Force on tick for readers and callback flooders
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/1] rcu: Remove unused function rcutorture_record_progress
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] rcu/nocb: Round down for number of no-CBs grace-period kthreads
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/10] rcu/nocb: Reduce ->nocb_lock contention with separate ->nocb_gp_lock
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] rcu/nocb: Avoid needless wakeups of no-CBs grace-period kthread
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/10] rcu/nocb: Reduce contention at no-CBs registry-time CB advancement
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/10] rcu/nocb: Make __call_rcu_nocb_wake() safe for many callbacks
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/10] rcu/nocb: Never downgrade ->nocb_defer_wakeup in wake_nocb_gp_defer()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/10] rcu/nocb: Unconditionally advance and wake for excessive CBs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] rcu/nocb: Avoid ->nocb_lock capture by corresponding CPU
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/10] rcu/nocb: Reduce contention at no-CBs invocation-done time
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/10] rcu/nocb: Enable re-awakening under high callback load
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/10] No-CBs contention-reduction updates for v5.3-rc2
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/18] rcu/nocb: Use build-time no-CBs check in rcu_do_batch()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/18] rcu/nocb: Use build-time no-CBs check in rcu_pending()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/18] rcu/nocb: Use separate flag to indicate disabled ->cblist
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/18] rcu/nocb: Use rcu_segcblist for no-CBs CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/18] rcu/nocb: Use separate flag to indicate offloaded ->cblist
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/18] rcu/nocb: Leave ->cblist enabled for no-CBs CPUs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/18] rcu/nocb: Suppress uninitialized false-positive in nocb_gp_wait()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/18] rcu/nocb: Remove obsolete nocb_gp_head and nocb_gp_tail fields
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/18] rcu/nocb: Add checks for offloaded callback processing
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/18] rcu/nocb: Remove obsolete nocb_head and nocb_tail fields
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/18] rcu/nocb: Allow lockless use of rcu_segcblist_restempty()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/18] rcu/nocb: Allow lockless use of rcu_segcblist_empty()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/18] rcu/nocb: Remove obsolete nocb_q_count and nocb_q_count_lazy fields
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/18] rcu/nocb: Remove deferred wakeup checks for extended quiescent states
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/18] rcu/nocb: Use build-time no-CBs check in rcu_core()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/18] rcu/nocb: Check for deferred nocb wakeups before nohz_full early exit
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/18] rcu/nocb: Make rcutree_migrate_callbacks() start at leaf rcu_node structure
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/18] rcu/nocb: Remove obsolete nocb_cb_tail and nocb_cb_head fields
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/18] No-CBs cblist updates for v5.3-rc2
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/11] rcu/nocb: Rename and document no-CB CB kthread sleep trace event
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/11] rcu/nocb: Rename wake_nocb_leader() to wake_nocb_gp()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/11] rcu/nocb: Rename nocb_follower_wait() to nocb_cb_wait()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/11] rcu/nocb: Provide separate no-CBs grace-period kthreads
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/11] rcu/nocb: Rename __wake_nocb_leader() to __wake_nocb_gp()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/11] rcu/nocb: Print gp/cb kthread hierarchy if dump_tree
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/11] rcu/nocb: Update comments to prepare for forward-progress work
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/11] No-CBs grace-period kthread updates for v5.3-rc2
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/11] rcu/nocb: Rename rcu_data fields to prepare for forward-progress work
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/11] rcu/nocb: Rename wake_nocb_leader_defer() to wake_nocb_gp_defer()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/11] rcu/nocb: Rename rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads() local variable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/11] rcu/nocb: Rename rcu_nocb_leader_stride kernel boot parameter
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/8] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for RCU readers
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/8] x86/pci: Pass lockdep condition to pcm_mmcfg_list iterator
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/8] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/8] treewide: Rename rcu_dereference_raw_notrace() to _check()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/8] driver/core: Convert to use built-in RCU list checking
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/8] acpi: Use built-in RCU list checking for acpi_ioremaps list
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/8] rcu: Remove redundant debug_locks check in rcu_read_lock_sched_held()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/8] ipv4: Add lockdep condition to fix for_each_entry()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/8] RCU list-traversal lockdep updates for v5.4
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/12] rcu: Change return type of rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/12] arm: Use common outgoing-CPU-notification code
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/12] doc: Add rcutree.kthread_prio pointer to stallwarn.txt
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/12] rcu: Remove redundant "if" condition from rcu_gp_is_expedited()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great"
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/12] rcu: Add destroy_work_on_stack() to match INIT_WORK_ONSTACK()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/12] rcu: Restore barrier() to rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/12] time/tick-broadcast: Fix tick_broadcast_offline() lockdep complaint
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/12] lockdep: Make print_lock() address visible
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/12] idle: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from disrupting offline
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/12] srcu: Avoid srcutorture security-based pointer obfuscation
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/12] rcu: Add kernel parameter to dump trace after RCU CPU stall warning
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/12] Miscellaneous fixes for v5.4
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_read_unlock_special() deferred wakeups
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_note_context_switch exit from critical section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/3] Straggling consolidation cleanups for v5.4
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] rcu: Make rcu_read_unlock_special() checks match raise_softirq_irqoff()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Doc updates to /dev branch
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
['PATCH v2' 6/7] Restore docs "treewide: Rename rcu_dereference_raw_notrace() to _check()"
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
['PATCH v2' 7/7] Restore docs "rcu: Restore barrier() to rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock()"
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
['PATCH v2' 5/7] docs: rcu: Increase toctree to 3
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
['PATCH v2' 4/7] docs: rcu: Correct links referring to titles
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
['PATCH v2' 2/7] Revert docs from "treewide: Rename rcu_dereference_raw_notrace() to _check()"
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
['PATCH v2' 1/7] Revert docs from "rcu: Restore barrier() to rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock()"
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 0/7] Doc updates to /dev branch
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/1] rcu: Remove unused function rcutorture_record_progress
From
: Ethan Hansen <1ethanhansen@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 0/9] Apply new rest conversion patches to /dev branch
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 0/9] Apply new rest conversion patches to /dev branch
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 0/9] Apply new rest conversion patches to /dev branch
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 0/9] Apply new rest conversion patches to /dev branch
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 8/9] Revert "Revert "rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking""
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 1/9] Revert "rcu: Restore barrier() to rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock()"
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 9/9] Revert "Revert "rcu: Restore barrier() to rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock()""
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 7/9] Revert "Revert "treewide: Rename rcu_dereference_raw_notrace() to _check()""
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 6/9] docs: rcu: Increase toctree to 3
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 5/9] docs: rcu: Correct links referring to titles
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 3/9] Revert "treewide: Rename rcu_dereference_raw_notrace() to _check()"
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 2/9] Revert "rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking"
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 0/9] Apply new rest conversion patches to /dev branch
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] docs: rcu: Increase toctree to 3
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] docs: rcu: Correct links referring to titles
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v3 3/3] docs: rcu: Increase toctree to 3
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v3 2/3] docs: rcu: Correct links referring to titles
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v3 0/3] Convert some RCU articles to ReST
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU?
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great"
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 1/7] docs: fix broken doc references due to renames
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] rcu: Fix spelling mistake "greate"->"great"
From
: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 25/26] docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to ReST
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 1/7] docs: fix broken doc references due to renames
From
: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 1/7] docs: fix broken doc references due to renames
From
: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 00/26] ReST conversion of text files without .txt extension
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 00/26] ReST conversion of text files without .txt extension
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 1/7] docs: fix broken doc references due to renames
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU?
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU?
From
: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
How to turn scheduler tick on for current nohz_full CPU?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 03/14] docs: fix broken doc references due to renames
From
: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 00/22] ReST conversion of text files without .txt extension
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: This percpu_rwsem that always enters its reader slow path
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: This percpu_rwsem that always enters its reader slow path
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: This percpu_rwsem that always enters its reader slow path
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
This percpu_rwsem that always enters its reader slow path
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking (v3)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking (v3)
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 4/9] ipv4: add lockdep condition to fix for_each_entry (v1)
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking (v3)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 0/9] Harden list_for_each_entry_rcu() and family
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking (v3)
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 8/9] acpi: Use built-in RCU list checking for acpi_ioremaps list (v1)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 6/9] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 7/9] x86/pci: Pass lockdep condition to pcm_mmcfg_list iterator (v1)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 5/9] driver/core: Convert to use built-in RCU list checking (v1)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 4/9] ipv4: add lockdep condition to fix for_each_entry (v1)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking (v3)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section (v2)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 03/14] docs: fix broken doc references due to renames
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 00/14] pending doc patches for 5.3-rc
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] rculist: Add build check for single optional list argument
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 7/9] x86/pci: Pass lockdep condition to pcm_mmcfg_list iterator (v1)
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 8/9] acpi: Use built-in RCU list checking for acpi_ioremaps list (v1)
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 7/9] x86/pci: Pass lockdep condition to pcm_mmcfg_list iterator (v1)
From
: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 101/249] rcu: Force inlining of rcu_read_lock()
From
: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 048/105] rcu: Force inlining of rcu_read_lock()
From
: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 30/53] rcu: Force inlining of rcu_read_lock()
From
: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking (v3)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 0/9] Harden list_for_each_entry_rcu() and family
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 1/9] rcu/update: Remove useless check for debug_locks (v1)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section (v2)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 4/9] ipv4: add lockdep condition to fix for_each_entry (v1)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 6/9] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check (v2)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 5/9] driver/core: Convert to use built-in RCU list checking (v1)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 8/9] acpi: Use built-in RCU list checking for acpi_ioremaps list (v1)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 37/73] rcu: Force inlining of rcu_read_lock()
From
: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 9/9] doc: Update documentation about list_for_each_entry_rcu (v1)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 7/9] x86/pci: Pass lockdep condition to pcm_mmcfg_list iterator (v1)
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 067/158] rcu: Force inlining of rcu_read_lock()
From
: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.1 089/219] rcu: Force inlining of rcu_read_lock()
From
: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] docs: fix broken doc links due to renames
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcuperf: Make rcuperf kernel test more robust for !expedited mode
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 3/9] rcu/sync: Remove custom check for reader-section
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 7/9] x86/pci: Pass lockdep condition to pcm_mmcfg_list iterator
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 9/9] doc: Update documentation about list_for_each_entry_rcu
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 8/9] acpi: Use built-in RCU list checking for acpi_ioremaps list
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 6/9] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 5/9] driver/core: Convert to use built-in RCU list checking
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 4/9] ipv4: add lockdep condition to fix for_each_entry
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 2/9] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 1/9] rcu/update: Remove useless check for debug_locks
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2 0/9] Harden list_for_each_entry_rcu() and family
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] treewide: Rename rcu_dereference_raw_notrace to _check
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] treewide: Rename rcu_dereference_raw_notrace to _check
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] driver/core: Convert to use built-in RCU list checking
From
: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] Harden list_for_each_entry_rcu() and family
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v1 0/6] Harden list_for_each_entry_rcu() and family
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v1 1/6] rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v1 4/6] workqueue: Convert for_each_wq to use built-in list check
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v1 5/6] x86/pci: Pass lockdep condition to pcm_mmcfg_list iterator
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v1 6/6] acpi: Use built-in RCU list checking for acpi_ioremaps list
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v1 3/6] driver/core: Convert to use built-in RCU list checking
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v1 2/6] ipv4: add lockdep condition to fix for_each_entry
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] treewide: Rename rcu_dereference_raw_notrace to _check
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] treewide: Rename rcu_dereference_raw_notrace to _check
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] rcu: Make jiffies_till_sched_qs writable
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [attn: Steve] Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [attn: Steve] Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[attn: Steve] Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcuperf: Make rcuperf kernel test more robust for !expedited mode
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcuperf: Make rcuperf kernel test more robust for !expedited mode
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcuperf: Make rcuperf kernel test more robust for !expedited mode
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcuperf: Make rcuperf kernel test more robust for !expedited mode
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] rcuperf: Make rcuperf kernel test more robust for !expedited mode
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] rcuperf: Make rcuperf kernel test more robust for !expedited mode
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] rcuperf: Make rcuperf test more robust for !expedited mode
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] rcuperf: Make rcuperf test more robust for !expedited mode
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Normal RCU grace period can be stalled for long because need-resched flags not set?
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[RFC] rcuperf: Make rcuperf test more robust for !expedited mode
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 1/3] rcu: Expedite the rcu quiescent state reporting if help needed
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3] rcu: Change return type of rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread()
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3] rcu: Change return type of rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3] rcu: Change return type of rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread()
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 1/3] rcu: Expedite the rcu quiescent state reporting if help needed
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 2/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_note_context_switch exit from critical section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 2/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_note_context_switch exit from critical section
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v3] rcu: Change return type of rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 2/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_note_context_switch exit from critical section
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"
From
: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 1/3] rcu: Expedite the rcu quiescent state reporting if help needed
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"
From
: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[RFC 2/3] rcu: Simplify rcu_note_context_switch exit from critical section
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[RFC 1/3] rcu: Expedite the rcu quiescent state reporting if help needed
From
: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v3] rcu: Change return type of rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread()
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: Change return type of rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread()
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: Change return type of rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread()
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Scott Wood <swood@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [GIT PULL rcu/next + tools/memory-model] RCU and LKMM commits for 5.3
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [RFC] Deadlock via recursive wakeup via RCU with threadirqs
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Samsung SoC]
[Linux Rockchip SoC]
[Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]
[Linux Actions SoC]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Video for Linux]
[Linux SCSI]
[Scanners]
[Yosemite Forum]