[PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/18] rcu/nocb: Check for deferred nocb wakeups before nohz_full early exit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In theory, a timer is used to defer wakeups of no-CBs grace-period
kthreads when the wakeup cannot be done safely directly from the
call_rcu().  In practice, the one-jiffy delay is not always consistent
with timely callback invocation under heavy call_rcu() loads.  Therefore,
there are a number of checks for a pending deferred wakeup, including
from the scheduling-clock interrupt.  Unfortunately, this check follows
the rcu_nohz_full_cpu() early exit, which renders it useless on such CPUs.

This commit therefore moves the check for the pending deferred no-CB
wakeup to precede the rcu_nohz_full_cpu() early exit.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index ea479d81da7f..f1a25d17e3a0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2739,6 +2739,10 @@ static int rcu_pending(void)
 	/* Check for CPU stalls, if enabled. */
 	check_cpu_stall(rdp);
 
+	/* Does this CPU need a deferred NOCB wakeup? */
+	if (rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(rdp))
+		return 1;
+
 	/* Is this CPU a NO_HZ_FULL CPU that should ignore RCU? */
 	if (rcu_nohz_full_cpu())
 		return 0;
@@ -2763,10 +2767,6 @@ static int rcu_pending(void)
 	    unlikely(READ_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap))) /* outside lock */
 		return 1;
 
-	/* Does this CPU need a deferred NOCB wakeup? */
-	if (rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup(rdp))
-		return 1;
-
 	/* nothing to do */
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux