On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 02:01:02PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 08:54:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > [ . . . ] > > > > > Pulled into tip:core/rcu, thanks a lot Paul! > > > > Thank you! > > > > > The merge commit is a bit non-standard: > > > > > > 07f038a408fb: Merge LKMM and RCU commits > > > > > > but clear enough IMHO. Usually we try to keep this format: > > > > > > 6c06b66e957c: Merge branch 'X' into Y > > > > > > even for internal merge commits. > > > > Please accept my apologies! How about as shown below? If this works > > for you, I will rebase my development commits on top this merge commit > > in order to make sure I don't revert back to my old format for next > > merge window. > > Looks good - but I don't think we should create a new merge commit just > for this. Ah, right -- I need to keep my development commits on top of the old merge commit to enable the likely additional pull request that I mentioned below. Good point! ;-) Thanx, Paul > > Ah, speaking of reminding me... There is likely to be one more small RCU > > commit requested by the RISC-V guys. If testing and review goes well, > > I will send you a pull request for it by the middle of next week. > > Thanks! > > Ingo
