Re: [RFC 3/3] Revert "rcutorture: Tweak kvm options"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 04:48:43PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 4:14 PM Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:23:58PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2019-07-01 00:04:15 [-0400], Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > > This reverts commit a6fda6dab93c2c06ef4b8cb4b9258df6674d2438 which
> > > > causes kvm.sh to not run on my machines. The qemu-system-x86_64 command
> > > > runs but does nothing.
> > >
> > > Nope. I would like to know *why* you need 'noapic' to work. Is it a
> > > brand new or old qemu-system-x86_64?
> >
> > I did not have time to debug yesterday and I posted this particular revert as
> > an 'RFC' just to make aware of this problem.
> >
> > I spent some more time just now, it looks like this has nothing to do with
> > 'noapic' and appears to be a problem on debian distros with the e1000e NIC.
> > May be this NIC was added to the virtual hardware because of -machine in the
> > patch?
> >
> > Any if I add the following to the qemu command that kvm.sh runs, it works again:
> > -net nic,model=e1000
> >
> > Without it I get:
> >  qemu-system-x86_64: Initialization of device e1000e failed: failed to find romfile "efi-e1000e.rom"
> >
> > Seems to be mentioned here:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ipxe/+bug/1737211
> >
> > And in syzkaller as well:
> > https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/vm/qemu/qemu.go#L88
> >
> > Adding Dmitry who is syzkaller owner for any thoughts as well.
> 
> I don't have many thoughts on this. That particular error looked like
> a bug in the package in the particular distro/version.

Paul, what is your preference here? Can we add the -net nic,model=e1000 to
fix it for the benefit of any other Debian folks running kvm.sh?

Or do you prefer if I just built my own custom Qemu? I can't upgrade Qemu on
this machine unfortunately. But may be I can build my own.

I prefer the -net option since I can save the time for something else. ;) Let
me know what you prefer and I'll fix it accordingly.

thanks,

 J.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux