On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:25:57PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > There is a spelling mistake in file tree_exp.h, > fix this. > > Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Queued, thank you very much! Thanx, Paul > --- > kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h > index af7e7b9..609fc87 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h > @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp) > * other hand, if the CPU is not in an RCU read-side critical section, > * the IPI handler reports the quiescent state immediately. > * > - * Although this is a greate improvement over previous expedited > + * Although this is a great improvement over previous expedited > * implementations, it is still unfriendly to real-time workloads, so is > * thus not recommended for any sort of common-case code. In fact, if > * you are using synchronize_rcu_expedited() in a loop, please restructure > -- > Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, > Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project >
