On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 12:41 PM Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 11:30:36AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 11:25:20 -0400 > > Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > I am sorry if this is not a realistic real-life problem, but more a > > > "doctor it hurts if I do this" problem as Steven once said ;-) > > > > > > I'll keep poking ;-) > > > > Hi Joel, > > > > Can you also share the tests you are performing as well as any > > module/code changes you made so that we can duplicate the results? > > Sure thing. Below is the diff that I applied to Paul's /dev branch. But I > believe Linus's tree should have same results. > > After applying the diff below, I run it like this: > tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --bootargs rcuperf.pd_test=1 rcuperf.pd_busy_wait=5000 rcuperf.holdout=5 rcuperf.pd_resched=0 --duration 1 --torture rcuperf > Sorry the quotes are missing, the command is: tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --bootargs "rcuperf.pd_test=1 rcuperf.pd_busy_wait=5000 rcuperf.holdout=5 rcuperf.pd_resched=0" --duration 1 --torture rcuperf
