Linux Next

• Thread Index

• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/1] wl128x: Remove unused NO_OF_ENTRIES_IN_ARRAY macro.
  • From: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging: fix hv_mouse build, needs delay.h
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 1
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the gfs2 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failed to fetch the blackfin tree
  • From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failed to fetch the blackfin tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc-current tree related)
  • From: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] pci-label: Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc-current tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 31
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc-current tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: xilinx linux-next tree addition request
  • From: John Linn <linnj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: xilinx linux-next tree addition request
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ptrace pull request for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] pci-label: Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] pci-label: Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 29
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
  • From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: <Shyam_Iyer@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next resend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next RESEND] staging/rtl81*: build as loadable modules only
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next RESEND] usb: fix isp1760-hcd printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fw: [PATCH -next RESEND/still needed] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next resend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mmc: SDHI should depend on SUPERH || ARCH_SHMOBILE
  • From: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH] mmc: SDHI should depend on SUPERH || ARCH_SHMOBILE
  • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] MFD: allow cs5535-mfd to build on X86 only
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] MFD: allow cs5535-mfd to build on X86 only
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 28
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ocfs2 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• xilinx linux-next tree addition request
  • From: John Linn <John.Linn@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the rcu tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] lib, arch: add filter argument to show_mem and fix private implementations
  • From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH RFC] consolidate *_le_bit operations [was: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree]
  • From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 25
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the rcu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the alacrity tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
  • From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [patch] lib, arch: add filter argument to show_mem and fix private implementations
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/1] m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/1] m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] MAX8997/8966 MFD: Add IRQ control feature
  • From: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the alacrity tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/1] m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/1] m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v7] MAX8997/8966 MFD: Add IRQ control feature
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging/rtl81*: build as loadable modules only
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 21 (staging/olpc_dcon)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
  • From: 함명주 <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v7] MAX8997/8966 MFD: Add IRQ control feature
  • From: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the hwmon-staging tree
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH RFC] consolidate *_le_bit operations [was linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)]
  • From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 17
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the hwmon-staging tree
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning in Linus' tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] rdma/addr: Initialize ret to fix build warning
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the hwmon-staging tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] rdma/addr: Initialize ret to fix build warning
  • From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] rdma/addr: Initialize ret to fix build warning
  • From: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tile tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the nfsd tree
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next] i2c-designware build errors
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next] i2c-designware build errors
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [next] i2c-designware build errors
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: David Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warnings after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V4] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 16 (nfsd)
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 16 (nfsd)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ubi tree related)
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ubi tree related)
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ubi tree related)
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ubi tree related)
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (vfs tree related)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (vfs tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ubi tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound tree related)
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the galak tree
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the galak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] uml: fix tty interface warnings
  • From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] uml: fix tty interface warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] sunrpc: fix printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] usb: fix ips1760-hcd printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 15 (xen/events.c)
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the slab tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next RESEND/still needed] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 15 (xen/events.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] soc: sgtl5000 uses regulator interfaces
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 21 (usb/serial)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-two tree with the tip tree
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bkl-config tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bkl-config tree
  • From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the bkl-config tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the xen-two tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] langwell_gpio: fix CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED build
  • From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the slab tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (block/mm/fs)
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (block/mm/fs)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] eeepc-wmi: kconfig changes to fix build errors
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [next] xfs: error: called object 'panic' is not a function
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2 -next] usb-storage: fix menu ordering
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2 -next] usb-storage: ene_ub6250 depends on USB_STORAGE
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH V4] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs
  • From: <Shyam_Iyer@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? (Offensive Word Found In Message) Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cifs tree
  • From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure lin Linus' tree
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the nfsd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the cifs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH V4] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs
  • From: <Jordan_Hargrave@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure lin Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 7
  • From: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RFC: Removing old tags, reducing the git size of -next.
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix ACPI wakeup build failure
  • From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] x86: Fix ACPI wakeup build failure
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 7
  • From: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: "Bhanu Gollapudi" <bprakash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: "Zou, Yi" <yi.zou@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] x86: Fix mismatched ENTRY/END pair
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RFC: Removing old tags, reducing the git size of -next.
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RFC: Removing old tags, reducing the git size of -next.
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: "Dmitry Kravkov" <dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: "Bhanu Gollapudi" <bprakash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V4] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs
  • From: <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: Enter net/ipv6/ even if CONFIG_IPV6=n
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V4] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 7
  • From: <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V4] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs
  • From: <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging/hv: add missing include causing build error
  • From: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 7 (BROKEN iwlwifi)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 7
  • From: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: "Igor M. Liplianin" <liplianin@xxxxx>
• Re: Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap_dss2 tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 4
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 7
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap_dss2 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 4
  • From: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Duplicate patches in the tree
  • From: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Duplicate patches in the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Duplicate patches in the tree
  • From: Jesper Juhl <jj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] soc: sgtl5000 uses regulator interfaces
  • From: Zeng Zhaoming <zengzm.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] soc: sgtl5000 uses regulator interfaces
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] soc: sgtl5000 uses regulator interfaces
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: Enter net/ipv6/ even if CONFIG_IPV6=n
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 21 (usb/serial)
  • From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] net: Enter net/ipv6/ even if CONFIG_IPV6=n
  • From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the i.MX tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (netfilter)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 21 (usb/serial)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree
  • From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH] move cd1865.h to drivers/staging/tty/
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 3 (staging/tty/specialix)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging/brcm80211: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Build problems in kisskb ARM configs
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree
  • From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the unicore32 tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: "Guan Xuetao" <gxt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree
  • From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging/brcm80211: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Stanislav Fomichev <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 3
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the acpi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the unicore32 tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging/brcm80211: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging/brcm80211: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging/brcm80211: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: david@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree
  • From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the wireless tree
  • From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging/brcm80211: fix printk format warnings
  • From: "Roland Vossen" <rvossen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] tmio: silence warnings introduced by mfd changes
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree
  • From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: david@xxxxxxxxxxx
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap and omap_dss2 trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RFC: Removing old tags, reducing the git size of -next.
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RFC: Removing old tags, reducing the git size of -next.
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging/brcm80211: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-config tree with the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-config tree with the tty tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-config tree with the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-config tree with the tty tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] tmio: silence warnings introduced by mfd changes
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 1 (staging/winbond)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 1 (staging/winbond)
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] rtlwifi: usb parts should depend on CONFIG_USB
  • From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 1 (staging/winbond)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 1 (staging/winbond)
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 1 (staging/winbond)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 1 (staging/winbond)
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] rtlwifi: usb parts should depend on CONFIG_USB
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] video/tmiofb: silence warnings introduced by mfd changes
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 1 (staging/winbond)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (devicetree tree related)
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: David Jander <david.jander@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 1
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (devicetree tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [build fix] ACPI: Fix build for CONFIG_NET unset
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warnings after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the i.MX tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH upstream build breakage] acpi: several drivers depend on NET
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH upstream build breakage] acpi: several drivers depend on NET
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Elimination of of_platform_bus_type remains in devicetree/next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH upstream build breakage] acpi: several drivers depend on NET
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: usb parts should depend on CONFIG_USB
  • From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: usb parts should depend on CONFIG_USB
  • From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: usb parts should depend on CONFIG_USB
  • From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: usb parts should depend on CONFIG_USB
  • From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Elimination of of_platform_bus_type remains in devicetree/next
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH upstream build breakage] acpi: several drivers depend on NET
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] dnet: fix wrong use of platform_set_drvdata()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: usb parts should depend on CONFIG_USB
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: usb parts should depend on CONFIG_USB
  • From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] rtlwifi: usb parts should depend on CONFIG_USB
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH upstream build breakage] acpi: several drivers depend on NET
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound and sound-asoc trees
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (kvm tree related)
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 28
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the bkl-config tree with the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound and sound-asoc trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (kvm tree related)
  • From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (kvm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] slub: fix ksize() build error
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] slub: fix ksize() build error
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] slub: fix ksize() build error
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] slub: fix ksize() build error
  • From: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: memblock compile warnings
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
  • From: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 25 (mm/slub.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH/resend] sched: add #ifdef around irq time accounting functions
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] tty: phase out of ioctl file pointer for tty3270 as well
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] sched: add #ifdef around irq time accounting functions
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• memblock compile warnings
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 25
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the omap tree
  • From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the acpi tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the tree
  • From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the acpi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the sh tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] eeepc-wmi: kconfig changes to fix build errors
  • From: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the sh tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] eeepc-wmi: kconfig changes to fix build errors
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next packages for openSUSE
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
  • From: "Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)" <jvrao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
  • From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
  • From: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wl12xx: fix sdio_test kconfig/build errors
  • From: "Coelho, Luciano" <coelho@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] bluetooth: fix build break
  • From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Mattia Dongili <malattia@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the i2c tree
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] bluetooth: fix build break
  • From: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2] i2c: i2c-omap: fix build break with CONFIG_SUSPEND=n
  • From: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2] i2c: i2c-omap: make dev_pm_ops a const struct
  • From: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Mattia Dongili <malattia@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
  • From: "Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)" <jvrao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the i2c tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging: fix olpc_dcon kconfig and build errors
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
  • From: "Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)" <jvrao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warnings after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the v9fs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging: fix olpc_dcon kconfig and build errors
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Ilya Yanok <yanok@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wl12xx: fix sdio_test kconfig/build errors
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 21 (usb/serial)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] dnet: fix wrong use of platform_set_drvdata()
  • From: Ilya Yanok <yanok@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 21 (usb/serial)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the i2c tree
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH wq#for-2.6.39] workqueue: fix build failure introduced by s/freezeable/freezable/
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH wq#for-2.6.39] workqueue: fix build failure introduced by s/freezeable/freezable/
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the omap tree
  • From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (kvm tree related)
  • From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (kvm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the workqueues tree
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warnings after merge of the i2c tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the jdelvare-hwmon tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the omap tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hwmon-staging tree with the jdelvare-hwmon tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the workqueues tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hwmon-staging tree with the jdelvare-hwmon tree
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the hwmon-staging tree with the jdelvare-hwmon tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] wl12xx: fix sdio_test kconfig/build errors
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Allow sharing xvmalloc for zram and zcache
  • From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] Allow sharing xvmalloc for zram and zcache
  • From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 00/11] [resend] drm core and radeon patches for -next
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Allow sharing xvmalloc for zram and zcache
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the staging.current tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the workqueues tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the workqueues tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the omap tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• [-next] ERROR: "usb_unanchor_urb" [drivers/net/wireless/rtlwifi/rtlwifi.ko] undefined!
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [kbuild] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [kbuild] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the workqueues tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the workqueues tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the omap tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the omap tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] platform/x86: intel_mid_powerbutton needs INPUT
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the spi-current tree
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] PCI: fix tlan build when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the spi-current tree
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the spi-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bluetooth tree
  • From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20110214] Kernel-modules with unknown parameter
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20110214] Kernel-modules with unknown parameter
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20110214] Kernel-modules with unknown parameter
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20110214] Kernel-modules with unknown parameter
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20110214] Kernel-modules with unknown parameter
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the bluetooth tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20110214] Kernel-modules with unknown parameter
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] PCI: fix tlan build when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled
  • From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] PCI: fix tlan build when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled
  • From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] PCI: fix tlan build when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] PCI: fix tlan build when CONFIG_PCI is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20110214] Kernel-modules with unknown parameter
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20110214] Kernel-modules with unknown parameter
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20110214] Kernel-modules with unknown parameter
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (netfilter)
  • From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 11 (build errors/warnings)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the edac-amd tree with the tip tree
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problen with next-20110211
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c tree (arm tree interaction)
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problen with next-20110211
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problen with next-20110211
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxx>