Linux Next

• Thread Index

• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please include the namespace file-descriptors tree in linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ptrace pull request for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
  • From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
  • From: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ptrace pull request for linux-next
  • From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: <Sathya.Perla@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
  • From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] fs/partitions: fix printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the block tree
  • From: Tao Ma <tm@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] ASoC: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] soc: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] soc: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] soc: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 5
  • From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] soc: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (suspend tree related)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [next] net/mac80211/main.c:700: error: 'const struct ieee80211_ops' has no member named 'suspend'
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [next] net/mac80211/main.c:700: error: 'const struct ieee80211_ops' has no member named 'suspend'
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (wireless)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (wireless)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (wireless)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ux500-core tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ux500-core tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (suspend tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: add Docs git tree to linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: add Docs git tree to linux-next
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the suspend tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
  • From: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
  • From: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
  • From: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ux500-core tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the suspend tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] x86/net: only select BPF_JIT when NET is enabled
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] sound: fix lola build
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
  • From: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] x86/net: only select BPF_JIT when NET is enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] sound: fix lola build
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the net tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the 52xx-and-virtex tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4.4+
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 3
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the 52xx-and-virtex tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4.4+
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] tg3: Fix failure to enable WoL by default when possible
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (rcutiny)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml builds fail)
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml builds fail)
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml irqs)
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml irqs)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml builds fail)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml builds fail)
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (xen)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (rcutiny)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml builds fail)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
• [PATCH] kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4.4+
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the net tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)
  • From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (gpu/drm)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (uml build issue)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ux500-core tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 29
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (powercp tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 28 (staging/wlan-ng: prism2)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ux500-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ibmveth runtime errors
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 28 (staging/wlan-ng: prism2)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ux500-core tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: add Docs git tree to linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 28
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bluetooth tree
  • From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with Linus' tree
  • From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• add Docs git tree to linux-next
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ibmveth runtime errors
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the bluetooth tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the ux500-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net-next] r8169: fix merge conflict fix.
  • From: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH net-next] r8169: fix merge conflict fix.
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ibmveth runtime errors
  • From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 26 (kvm)
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ibmveth runtime errors
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 27
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 26 (kvm) (resend)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 26 (x86 mmu) (resend)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the bluetooth tree
  • From: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] misc: fix ti-st build issues
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the bluetooth tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 26
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the bluetooth tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the i2c tree with the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Change in DaVinci tree for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Change in DaVinci tree for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Change in DaVinci tree for linux-next
  • From: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
  • From: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
  • From: "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] kvm: fix const value warning on i386
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: at91 next tree
  • From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: at91 next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: at91 next tree
  • From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: at91 next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• at91 next tree
  • From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (battery tree related)
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (battery tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] kvm: fix const value warning on i386
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (md/raid456)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] driver core: syscore exports for modular APM
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] driver core: syscore exports for modular APM
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 20
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 20
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (fbdev tree related)
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 20
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (fbdev tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] driver core: syscore exports for modular APM
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] driver core: syscore exports for modular APM
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging/intel_sst: intelmid needs delay.h
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] driver core: syscore exports for modular APM
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the fbdev-current tree
  • From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the fbdev-current tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the fbdev-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] mac80211: fix debugfs printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warnings after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gfs2 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 13
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] mmc quirks: fix truncation warnings
  • From: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] mmc quirks: fix truncation warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 12
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warnings after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 11 (staging/olpc_dcon)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
  • From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
  • From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failed to fetch block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] usb/otg: fix twl6030 macro
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the bjdooks-i2c tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Alan Ott <alan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [net-next-2.6] Revert "net: Allow no-cache copy from user on transmit"
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [net-next-2.6] Revert "net: Allow no-cache copy from user on transmit"
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 7
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the fbdev tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failed to fetch block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failed to fetch block tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failed to fetch block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 6
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 6
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the staging.current tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the staging.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
  • From: "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the idle-test tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with the wireless-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with the wireless-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 (sound/soc)
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 (sound/soc)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 (sound/soc)
  • From: 高万龙 <gaowanlong@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 (sound/soc)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/1] wl128x: Remove unused NO_OF_ENTRIES_IN_ARRAY macro.
  • From: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging: fix hv_mouse build, needs delay.h
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for April 1
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the gfs2 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failed to fetch the blackfin tree
  • From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failed to fetch the blackfin tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc-current tree related)
  • From: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] pci-label: Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc-current tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 31
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc-current tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: xilinx linux-next tree addition request
  • From: John Linn <linnj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: xilinx linux-next tree addition request
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ptrace pull request for linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] pci-label: Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] pci-label: Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 29
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
  • From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: <Shyam_Iyer@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next resend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next RESEND] staging/rtl81*: build as loadable modules only
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next RESEND] usb: fix isp1760-hcd printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fw: [PATCH -next RESEND/still needed] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next resend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mmc: SDHI should depend on SUPERH || ARCH_SHMOBILE
  • From: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH] mmc: SDHI should depend on SUPERH || ARCH_SHMOBILE
  • From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] MFD: allow cs5535-mfd to build on X86 only
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] MFD: allow cs5535-mfd to build on X86 only
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 28
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ocfs2 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• xilinx linux-next tree addition request
  • From: John Linn <John.Linn@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the rcu tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] lib, arch: add filter argument to show_mem and fix private implementations
  • From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
  • From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH RFC] consolidate *_le_bit operations [was: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree]
  • From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 25
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the rcu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the alacrity tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
  • From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [patch] lib, arch: add filter argument to show_mem and fix private implementations
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/1] m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/1] m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] MAX8997/8966 MFD: Add IRQ control feature
  • From: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the alacrity tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/1] m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/1] m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v7] MAX8997/8966 MFD: Add IRQ control feature
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging/rtl81*: build as loadable modules only
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 21 (staging/olpc_dcon)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
  • From: 함명주 <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v7] MAX8997/8966 MFD: Add IRQ control feature
  • From: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the hwmon-staging tree
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH RFC] consolidate *_le_bit operations [was linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)]
  • From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 17
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the hwmon-staging tree
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning in Linus' tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] rdma/addr: Initialize ret to fix build warning
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the hwmon-staging tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] rdma/addr: Initialize ret to fix build warning
  • From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] rdma/addr: Initialize ret to fix build warning
  • From: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tile tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the nfsd tree
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next] i2c-designware build errors
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next] i2c-designware build errors
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [next] i2c-designware build errors
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: David Woodhouse <david.woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warnings after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V4] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 16 (nfsd)
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 16 (nfsd)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ubi tree related)
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ubi tree related)
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ubi tree related)
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ubi tree related)
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (vfs tree related)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (vfs tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ubi tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound tree related)
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sound tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the galak tree
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the galak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] uml: fix tty interface warnings
  • From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] uml: fix tty interface warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] sunrpc: fix printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] usb: fix ips1760-hcd printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 15 (xen/events.c)
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the slab tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next RESEND/still needed] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 15 (xen/events.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] soc: sgtl5000 uses regulator interfaces
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 21 (usb/serial)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-two tree with the tip tree
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bkl-config tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bkl-config tree
  • From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (jdelvare-hwmon tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the bkl-config tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the xen-two tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] langwell_gpio: fix CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED build
  • From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the slab tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (block/mm/fs)
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (block/mm/fs)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] eeepc-wmi: kconfig changes to fix build errors
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [next] xfs: error: called object 'panic' is not a function
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (block tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2 -next] usb-storage: fix menu ordering
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2 -next] usb-storage: ene_ub6250 depends on USB_STORAGE
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH V4] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs
  • From: <Shyam_Iyer@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? (Offensive Word Found In Message) Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the cifs tree
  • From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure lin Linus' tree
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the nfsd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the cifs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH V4] Export ACPI _DSM provided firmware instance number and string name to sysfs
  • From: <Jordan_Hargrave@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure lin Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Kernelspace firmware loaders (was: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb tree)
  • From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 7
  • From: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RFC: Removing old tags, reducing the git size of -next.
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix ACPI wakeup build failure
  • From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] x86: Fix ACPI wakeup build failure
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 7
  • From: Mariusz Kozlowski <mk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: "Bhanu Gollapudi" <bprakash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] [SCSI] bnx2fc: fix build error when !CONFIG_MODULES
  • From: "Zou, Yi" <yi.zou@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] x86: Fix mismatched ENTRY/END pair
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RFC: Removing old tags, reducing the git size of -next.
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RFC: Removing old tags, reducing the git size of -next.
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 8 (BROKEN: arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S? Debian's binutils/as?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: "Dmitry Kravkov" <dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>