Linux Next
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add drivers/target/ entry
From
: Fubo Chen <fubo.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add drivers/target/ entry
From
: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] target: fix tfc_io.c printk format warning
From
: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (sound/soc/codecs)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the suspend tree
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] x86: apic_flat_64.c needs module.h
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] x86: apic_flat_64.c needs module.h
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the suspend tree
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] mtd: fix physmap.h warnings
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] target: fix tfc_io.c printk format warning
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] x86: apic_flat_64.c needs module.h
From
: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (infiniband + netlink)
From
: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] x86: apic_flat_64.c needs module.h
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] x86: apic_flat_64.c needs module.h
From
: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [lm-sensors] linux-next: Tree for May 23 (hwmon/coretemp.c)
From
: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] x86: apic_flat_64.c needs module.h
From
: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (hwmon/coretemp.c)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] x86: apic_flat_64.c needs module.h
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the suspend tree
From
: Milton Miller <miltonm@xxxxxxx>
Re: [bloat] Measuring header file bloat effects on kernel build performance: a more than 2x slowdown ...
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (infiniband + netlink)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] ata: PATA_ARASAN_CF depends on DMADEVICES
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the suspend tree
From
: Milton Miller <milltonm@xxxxxxx>
Re: [bloat] Measuring header file bloat effects on kernel build performance: a more than 2x slowdown ...
From
: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [bloat] Measuring header file bloat effects on kernel build performance: a more than 2x slowdown ...
From
: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the suspend tree
From
: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] firmware: fix GOOGLE_SMI kconfig dependency warning
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the suspend tree
From
: mark gross <markgross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [bloat] Measuring header file bloat effects on kernel build performance: a more than 2x slowdown ...
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: [bloat] Measuring header file bloat effects on kernel build performance: a more than 2x slowdown ...
From
: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [bloat] Measuring header file bloat effects on kernel build performance: a more than 2x slowdown ...
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: [bloat] Measuring header file bloat effects on kernel build performance: a more than 2x slowdown ...
From
: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
[bloat] Measuring header file bloat effects on kernel build performance: a more than 2x slowdown ...
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the i.MX tree with the tree
From
: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 23
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the suspend tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] ata: PATA_ARASAN_CF depends on DMADEVICES
From
: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warnings in Linus' tree
From
: Eduardo Silva <edsiper@xxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the sparc tree with the fixes tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the s5p tree with the arm tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the i.MX tree with the tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warnings in Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] media: fix kconfig dependency warning for VIDEO_TIMBERDALE
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] ata: PATA_ARASAN_CF depends on DMADEVICES
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] firmware: fix GOOGLE_SMI kconfig dependency warning
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: fix 88pm8607.c printk format warning
From
: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix merge problem between sparc32 IPI patches and schedule_ipi() callback
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree
From
: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 20 (iwlwifi)
From
: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 20 (iwlwifi)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 2/2] SCHED_TTWU_QUEUE is not longer needed since sparc32 now implements IPI
From
: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 1/2] Fix merge problem between sparc32 IPI patches and schedule_ipi() callback
From
: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc tree
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc tree
From
: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the s390 tree
From
: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc tree
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree (net tree interaction)
From
: Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 20
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc tree
From
: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree
From
: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (tip/powerpc tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree (net tree interaction)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kbuild tree
From
: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kbuild tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the s390 tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
From
: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Fw: [PATCH -next RESEND/still needed] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Fw: [PATCH -next RESEND/still needed] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
From
: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
Re: Fw: [PATCH -next RESEND/still needed] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] staging: fix mei build when PM is not enabled
From
: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc tree
From
: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the scsi tree
From
: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the scsi tree
From
: Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@xxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] staging: fix mei build when PM is not enabled
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc tree
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c tree
From
: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: merge window reminder
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] ALSA: sound, core, pcm_lib: fix xrun_log
From
: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the rr tree
From
: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 19
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] ALSA: sound, core, pcm_lib: fix xrun_log
From
: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the i2c tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the powerpc tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the scsi tree
From
: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with the net tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] regulator: fix 88pm8607.c printk format warning
From
: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
RE: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the wireless tree
From
: "Sukesh Srikakula" <sukeshs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] regulator: fix 88pm8607.c printk format warning
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus tree
From
: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus tree
From
: Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the wireless tree
From
: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 18
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the scsi tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the rr tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the wireless tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the scsi tree
From
: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] crypto: fix aesni build on i386
From
: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] staging: fix ath6kl build when CFG80211 is not enabled
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] wireless: improve airo when PROC_FS is disabled
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] proc_fs: add stub for proc_mkdir_mode
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus tree
From
: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] crypto: fix aesni build on i386
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] net: ping: fix build failure
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] net: ping: fix build failure
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] net: ping: fix build failure
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] net: ping: fix build failure
From
: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] net: ping: fix build failure
From
: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (net/ipv4/ping)
From
: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the wireless tree
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the wireless tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the wireless tree
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 17
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the wireless tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (net/ipv4/ping)
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (net/ipv4/ping)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless tree
From
: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree with Linus' tree
From
: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 16
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the namespace tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the namespace tree with Linus' tree
From
: Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the namespace tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the wireless tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 12 (ssb)
From
: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the tree
From
: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 13
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (arm tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net tree
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the net tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 12 (ssb)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (namespace tree related)
From
: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
From
: Javier Cardona <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
From
: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 12
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless tree related)
From
: Javier Cardona <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (namespace tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 11 (staging/iio/adc + gpio)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] drm: fix nouveau_acpi build
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the mips tree
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 11
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the namespace tree
From
: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
Re: [PATCH] mfd: TPS65910 depends on I2C and must be built in
From
: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
From
: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the namespace tree with the m68k tree
From
: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the namespace tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
From
: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
From
: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] mfd: TPS65910 depends on I2C and must be built in
From
: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
From
: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] mfd: TPS65910 depends on I2C and must be built in
From
: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the namespace tree with the m68k tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the namespace tree with the m68k tree
From
: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the mips tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the mips tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Please include the namespace file-descriptors tree in linux-next
From
: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Please include the namespace file-descriptors tree in linux-next
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: ptrace pull request for linux-next
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
From
: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
From
: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: ptrace pull request for linux-next
From
: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
RE: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
From
: <Sathya.Perla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
From
: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 10
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the voltage tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
From
: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] fs/partitions: fix printk format warning
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with Linus' tree
From
: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
From
: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the block tree
From
: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 5
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the block tree
From
: Tao Ma <tm@xxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 9
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net tree
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the net tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the block tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] ASoC: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] soc: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
From
: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] soc: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] soc: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
From
: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 5
From
: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] soc: fix wm8958-dsp2 printk format warnings
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (suspend tree related)
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Re: [next] net/mac80211/main.c:700: error: 'const struct ieee80211_ops' has no member named 'suspend'
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[next] net/mac80211/main.c:700: error: 'const struct ieee80211_ops' has no member named 'suspend'
From
: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (wireless)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (wireless)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 6 (wireless)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ux500-core tree
From
: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ux500-core tree
From
: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 6
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (suspend tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: add Docs git tree to linux-next
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: add Docs git tree to linux-next
From
: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the suspend tree
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
RE: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
From
: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
RE: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
From
: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
RE: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
From
: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ux500-core tree
From
: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 5
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the suspend tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
From
: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] x86/net: only select BPF_JIT when NET is enabled
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] sound: fix lola build
From
: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
RE: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
From
: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] x86/net: only select BPF_JIT when NET is enabled
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] sound: fix lola build
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 4 (hyperv / vmbus)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the net tree
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 4
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the 52xx-and-virtex tree with Linus' tree
From
: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4.4+
From
: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 3
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the net tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the 52xx-and-virtex tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4.4+
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] tg3: Fix failure to enable WoL by default when possible
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (rcutiny)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml builds fail)
From
: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml builds fail)
From
: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml irqs)
From
: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml irqs)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml builds fail)
From
: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml builds fail)
From
: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (xen)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (rcutiny)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (uml builds fail)
From
: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
[PATCH] kbuild: Fix passing -Wno-* options to gcc 4.4+
From
: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for May 2
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the net tree
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
From
: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)
From
: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (bpf_jit)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (gpu/drm)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 29 (uml build issue)
From
: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ux500-core tree
From
: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 29
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (powercp tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 28 (staging/wlan-ng: prism2)
From
: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the suspend tree with the net tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ux500-core tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: ibmveth runtime errors
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 28 (staging/wlan-ng: prism2)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ux500-core tree
From
: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: add Docs git tree to linux-next
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 28
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bluetooth tree
From
: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with Linus' tree
From
: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
add Docs git tree to linux-next
From
: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: ibmveth runtime errors
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the bluetooth tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the ux500-core tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH net-next] r8169: fix merge conflict fix.
From
: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH net-next] r8169: fix merge conflict fix.
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: ibmveth runtime errors
From
: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
From
: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 26 (kvm)
From
: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: ibmveth runtime errors
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 27
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
From
: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
From
: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the cpufreq tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 26 (kvm) (resend)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 26 (x86 mmu) (resend)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the bluetooth tree
From
: "Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] misc: fix ti-st build issues
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the bluetooth tree
From
: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 26
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the bluetooth tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the i2c tree with the pci tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Change in DaVinci tree for linux-next
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: Change in DaVinci tree for linux-next
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Change in DaVinci tree for linux-next
From
: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@xxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
From
: Jason Uhlenkott <juhlenko@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
From
: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
From
: "Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] kvm: fix const value warning on i386
From
: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
From
: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: at91 next tree
From
: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
From
: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: at91 next tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: at91 next tree
From
: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: at91 next tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
at91 next tree
From
: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (battery tree related)
From
: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (battery tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] kvm: fix const value warning on i386
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (md/raid456)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 21
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] driver core: syscore exports for modular APM
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] driver core: syscore exports for modular APM
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 20
From
: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 20
From
: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (fbdev tree related)
From
: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 20
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (fbdev tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] driver core: syscore exports for modular APM
From
: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
From
: Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] driver core: syscore exports for modular APM
From
: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] staging/intel_sst: intelmid needs delay.h
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] driver core: syscore exports for modular APM
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
RE: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the fbdev-current tree
From
: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the fbdev-current tree
From
: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 19
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the fbdev-current tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 18
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] mac80211: fix debugfs printk format warning
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 15
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
RE: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
From
: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 14 (Call-traces: RCU/ACPI/WQ related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
From
: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 14
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
From
: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the usb tree
From
: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warnings after merge of the usb tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gfs2 tree with Linus' tree
From
: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
From
: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 13
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] mmc quirks: fix truncation warnings
From
: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] mmc quirks: fix truncation warnings
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
From
: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related)
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related)
From
: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 12
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
From
: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warnings after merge of the sound-asoc tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 11 (staging/olpc_dcon)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
From
: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
From
: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
From
: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: failed to fetch block tree
From
: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with Linus' tree
From
: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 11
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the wireless tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with Linus' tree
From
: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with Linus' tree
From
: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
From
: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
From
: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] usb/otg: fix twl6030 macro
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next reresend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 8
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with Linus' tree
From
: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
From
: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@xxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the bjdooks-i2c tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
From
: Alan Ott <alan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [net-next-2.6] Revert "net: Allow no-cache copy from user on transmit"
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [net-next-2.6] Revert "net: Allow no-cache copy from user on transmit"
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 7
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the fbdev tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: failed to fetch block tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: failed to fetch block tree
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: failed to fetch block tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 6
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 6
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 6
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 6
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the staging.current tree
From
: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the staging.current tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
From
: "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 5
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the idle-test tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with the wireless-current tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with the wireless-current tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 (sound/soc)
From
: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 (sound/soc)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 (sound/soc)
From
: 高万龙 <gaowanlong@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 (sound/soc)
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
From
: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
From
: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
From
: Matthew Garrett <mjg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
From
: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
From
: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 4 [BROKEN thinkpad_acpi]
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 4
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH 1/1] wl128x: Remove unused NO_OF_ENTRIES_IN_ARRAY macro.
From
: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]s
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
From
: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next] staging: fix hv_mouse build, needs delay.h
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 1 [BROKEN ubifs when CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y]
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for April 1
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the gfs2 tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: failed to fetch the blackfin tree
From
: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: failed to fetch the blackfin tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc-current tree related)
From
: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
RE: [PATCH] pci-label: Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: <Narendra_K@xxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc-current tree related)
From
: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for March 31
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc-current tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for March 30
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
From
: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
From
: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
From
: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
RE: xilinx linux-next tree addition request
From
: John Linn <linnj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: xilinx linux-next tree addition request
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: ptrace pull request for linux-next
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
From
: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] pci-label: Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] pci-label: Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
From
: Alex Elder <aelder@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for March 29
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH v2] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
From
: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH v2] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] memstick: make enable_dma less generic in r592
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
RE: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: <Shyam_Iyer@xxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH -next resend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
From
: Baruch Siach <baruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next RESEND] staging/rtl81*: build as loadable modules only
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next RESEND] usb: fix isp1760-hcd printk format warning
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fw: [PATCH -next RESEND/still needed] staging: altera-jtag needs delay.h
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH -next resend] i2c: designware-pcidrv depends on PCI
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] Fix build failure when CONFIG_NLS is set to 'm' by allmodconfig
From
: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] mmc: SDHI should depend on SUPERH || ARCH_SHMOBILE
From
: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
From
: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
From
: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
[PATCH] mmc: SDHI should depend on SUPERH || ARCH_SHMOBILE
From
: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] MFD: allow cs5535-mfd to build on X86 only
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] MFD: allow cs5535-mfd to build on X86 only
From
: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for March 28
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (mfd tree related)
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the ocfs2 tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
xilinx linux-next tree addition request
From
: John Linn <John.Linn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
From
: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the rcu tree
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [patch] lib, arch: add filter argument to show_mem and fix private implementations
From
: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 25 (Call trace: RCU|workqueues|block|VFS|ext4 related?)
From
: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
From
: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
From
: Jarod Wilson <jarod@xxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH RFC] consolidate *_le_bit operations [was: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree]
From
: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: Tree for March 25
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build warning after merge of the rcu tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drivers-x86 tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
From
: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the alacrity tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
linux-next: build failure after merge of the Linus' tree
From
: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
RE: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
From
: "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[patch] lib, arch: add filter argument to show_mem and fix private implementations
From
: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx51_efika: update platform data for new mfd changes
From
: Andres Salomon <dilinger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
RE: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
From
: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 63s! [kworker/0:1:7764])
From
: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 0/1] m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
From
: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: [PATCH 0/1] m68k: merge m68k and m68knommu arch directories
From
: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[PATCH] MAX8997/8966 MFD: Add IRQ control feature
From
: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
From
: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
From
: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
From
: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
From
: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cleancache tree with Linus' tree
From
: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Samba]
[Yosemite News]