Hi Geert,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:28:03 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 06:56, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I assume that this is fallout from commit a6b7a407865a ("net: remove
> > interrupt.h inclusion from netdevice.h").
>
> Ah, that's were the failures on m68k come from:
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/4222666/
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/4223000/
Yep.
> My first bisection between two successive versions of linux-next failed, but
Bisecting between successive linux-next versions is bound not to work.
Bisection really only works between a commit and one of ist ancestors.
> the second one between linus and linux-next just finished and points
> to that commit.
That is a much better bet.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpwgVcRnL53U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
