On Thu, 26 May 2011 23:15:34 +0200 Sjur Brændeland wrote: > Hi Randy, > > [Randy] > > (not new) > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c:194: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void > > drivers/net/caif/caif_serial.c:202: warning: 'return' with no value, in function returning non-void > > > > > > I'm curious: how do warnings like this get overlooked? > > too much noise in the build messages? or it wasn't overlooked, just ignored? > > The patch introducing this problem is "tty: make receive_buf() > return the amout of bytes received" by Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>. > It seems that this patch has been posted to linux-serial and not to > the netdev list or the gits net-next-2.6 or net-2.6 that I follow. > It's probably no excuse, but this problem is news to me. I see. Thanks for the explanation. > Should I post a patch on linux-next anyway for this issue? You or Felipe should, but he recently sent this note to the USB mailing list: "I'll be away until 31st of May on a business travel. Don't expect me to look into patches during that period." so it looks like it would better for you to do it, please. thanks, --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
