Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kbuild tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2.5.2011 17:17, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
On Mon, 02 May 2011 13:13:37 +0200, Michal Marek said:

+# We test for support of the -Wunused-but-set-variable option, because
+# some version of gcc will happily accept any -Wno-* switch and complain
+# later during build.
+ifeq ($(call cc-option-yn, -Wunused-but-set-variable), y)
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += -Wno-unused-but-set-variable
+endif

Do we need to do this more generically for all the other -Wno-foo
options under the various W={123} options?

I only see -Wno-unused-parameter in scripts/Makefile.build and that should be supported by any gcc version. Also please have a look at http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130433840412201&w=2, which is an updated version.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux