On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:14:49AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Grant, > > On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:12:02 -0600 Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Due to my own stupidity, this branch as /not/ been tested through > > linux-next. I put it in a branch that I negelcted to ask Stephen to > > include. :-( I'm asking him to add it for tonight. At the very > > least, it has been build tested on various x86, powerpc, mips, sparc > > and arm defconfigs. > > > > You'll probably want to hold off on actually pulling this one, but I > > wanted to give you a heads up that I have it still pending. If you've > > not picked it up, then I can resend the pull req tomorrow afternoon > > after confirming it hasn't messed up anything in linux-next. > > > > There's nothing earth shattering here. Just a bunch of driver updates > > and some faltering steps towards unifying a bunch of the mmio gpio > > logic. > > > > g. > > > > The following changes since commit 4db70f73e56961b9bcdfd0c36c62847a18b7dbb5: > > > > tmpfs: fix XATTR N overriding POSIX_ACL Y (2011-05-25 19:53:02 -0700) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 gpio/next > > I have added this tree even though it looks like Linus took it - just in > case there is more stuff. > > If you think it is unnecessary, let me know. Thanks Stephen. It's not unnecessary. I'll be adding more stuff to that branch for the next cycle. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
