On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Looking through the trees currently included in linux-next, I get the > feeling that some of them may be obsolete. > > Here is a list of tree that had no commits in them at the openning of the > previous two merge windows: > > linux-spec > pxa > galak > ceph > configfs > jfs > squashfs This is a surprise ... I'm sure I had commits in my squashfs linux-next tree at the opening of the last but one merge window... Linux 2.6.38 released 14 Mar 2011 $ git log --pretty="%ci %s" ... 2011-02-28 18:43:48 +0000 Squashfs: wrap squashfs_mount() definition 2011-02-28 18:35:44 +0000 Squashfs: xz_wrapper doesn't need to include squashfs_ 2011-02-28 18:35:36 +0000 Squashfs: Update documentation to include compression 2011-02-28 18:35:28 +0000 Squashfs: Update Kconfig help text to include xz compr 2011-02-28 18:34:24 +0000 Squashfs: add compression options support to xz decomp 2011-02-28 18:21:59 +0000 Squashfs: extend decompressor framework to handle comp 2011-02-07 16:03:55 -0800 Linux 2.6.38-rc4 Phillip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
