Hi Phillip, On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 02:26:07 +0100 Phillip Lougher <phillip.lougher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > squashfs > > This is a surprise ... I'm sure I had commits in my squashfs > linux-next tree at the opening of the last but one merge window... > > Linux 2.6.38 released 14 Mar 2011 > > $ git log --pretty="%ci %s" > ... > 2011-02-28 18:43:48 +0000 Squashfs: wrap squashfs_mount() definition > 2011-02-28 18:35:44 +0000 Squashfs: xz_wrapper doesn't need to include squashfs_ > 2011-02-28 18:35:36 +0000 Squashfs: Update documentation to include compression > 2011-02-28 18:35:28 +0000 Squashfs: Update Kconfig help text to include xz compr > 2011-02-28 18:34:24 +0000 Squashfs: add compression options support to xz decomp > 2011-02-28 18:21:59 +0000 Squashfs: extend decompressor framework to handle comp > 2011-02-07 16:03:55 -0800 Linux 2.6.38-rc4 plus or minus 1 day (and timezone jitter :-)): $ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110314/origin..next/20110314/squashfs | wc -l 0 $ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110315/origin..next/20110315/squashfs | wc -l 0 $ git rev-list --no-merges next/20110316/origin..next/20110316/squashfs | wc -l 6 It doesn't really matter, it was just a quick metric to choose a subset of trees to look at. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgphMDJCRgiDK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
