* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 01:06:52PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > maintainers (and not assume lack of ack after 24 hours means acceptance), or > > > > > > Wrong, 72 to 96 hours. Sunday to Wednesday/Thursday. > > > > Not that this is really material (the argument is pretty much the same even had > > you waited 3 days), but you are already wrong about the 'Sunday' part, because > > you posted it to lkml on *Monday* 13:27 GMT: > > > > Message-ID: <20110509132738.GB16919@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Mon, 9 May 2011 09:27:52 -0400 > > Sigh. So you're only looking at the _second_ posting of them, not the first. > > Here's the message, minus the patch. > > | Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 19:24:07 +0100 > | From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > | To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx>, > | "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > | Subject: i8253 clocksource consolidation > | Message-ID: <20110508182407.GN27807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > | > | Ralf, John, Ingo, hpa, I did not get that mail, at all. It's not in my spam mbox either. This pretty much explains why you assumed us informed and should explain to you why i was surprised by your way of handling the patch :-) Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
