On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Linus Walleij wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the trivial tree got a conflict in > > arch/arm/mach-u300/gpio.c between commit 4a5a6e2804a3 ("mach-u300: > > rewrite gpio driver, move to drivers/gpio") from the ux500-core tree and > > commit b0c3af5ef0d7 ("arm: mach-u300/gpio: Fix mem_region resource size > > miscalculations") from the trivial tree. > > > > The former removed the file updated by the latter. These updates should > > be applied to drivers/gpio/u300-gpio.c, now. Joe, maybe you could update > > your patch and send it to Linus Walleij. > > I rewrote the driver completely so likely it will rather be dropped, but > please check! I'll be happy to carry any patches. Seems to me that all the calls to request_mem_region() and release_mem_region() still need the resource_size() fixup even in the new driver. Either I can carry the current patch in my tree and let Linus resolve the conflict, or I can drop it from my tree and you take the fixes through your tree. Let me know what you prefer. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html