Le vendredi 29 avril 2011 Ã 09:26 -0700, Randy Dunlap a Ãcrit : > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:19:40 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20110428: > > > when CONFIG_MODULES is not enabled: > > bpf_jit_comp.c:(.text+0x43cc2): undefined reference to `module_free' > (.text+0x4521a): undefined reference to `module_alloc' > (.text+0x453af): undefined reference to `module_free' > > Oh well, I guess we can add one 'depends on MODULES' like we do for KPROBES (it also uses module_alloc()) Not sure many people build a !CONFIG_MODULES kernel these days... Thanks Randy ! [PATCH net-next-2.6] bpf: depends on MODULES module_alloc() and module_free() are available only if CONFIG_MODULES=y Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> --- net/Kconfig | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig index 745fb02..878151c 100644 --- a/net/Kconfig +++ b/net/Kconfig @@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ config HAVE_BPF_JIT config BPF_JIT bool "enable BPF Just In Time compiler" depends on HAVE_BPF_JIT + depends on MODULES ---help--- Berkeley Packet Filter filtering capabilities are normally handled by an interpreter. This option allows kernel to generate a native -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
