Linux EFI/UEFI Development
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [PATCH v2 03/10] asm-generic: Prepare for riscv use of pud_alloc_one and pud_free
- From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/10] riscv: Get rid of MAXPHYSMEM configs
- From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/10] riscv: Allow to dynamically define VA_BITS
- From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/10] Introduce sv48 support without relocatable kernel
- From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] doc: efi-readvar: Fix typo in command examples
- From: Chris Packham <chris.packham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V4 09/22] LoongArch: Add boot and setup routines
- From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] of, numa: Fetch empty NUMA node ID from distance map
- From: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Disable runtime services on RT
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Disable runtime services on RT
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Can EFI memory descriptors overlap?
- From: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/8] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/8] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/8] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/8] arch/cc: Introduce a function to check for confidential computing features
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/8] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/8] x86/ioremap: Selectively build arch override encryption functions
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] of, numa: Fetch empty NUMA node ID from distance map
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Disable runtime services on RT
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Disable runtime services on RT
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Disable runtime services on RT
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Disable runtime services on RT
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] of, numa: Fetch empty NUMA node ID from distance map
- From: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and corresponding structures
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] of, numa: Fetch empty NUMA node ID from distance map
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V4 09/22] LoongArch: Add boot and setup routines
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH V4 09/22] LoongArch: Add boot and setup routines
- From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] of, numa: Fetch empty NUMA node ID from distance map
- From: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] Documentation, dt, numa: Add note to empty NUMA node
- From: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] Specify empty NUMA node
- From: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation, dt, numa: Add note to empty NUMA node
- From: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] efi: Disable runtime services on RT
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] efi: Allow efi=runtime
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] efi: Disable runtime services on RT
- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] memblock: cleanup memblock_free interface
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock: cleanup memblock_free interface
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] memblock: cleanup memblock_free interface
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation, dt, numa: Add note to empty NUMA node
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] memblock: cleanup memblock_free interface
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] memblock: cleanup memblock_free interface
- From: Shahab Vahedi <Shahab.Vahedi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] memblock: cleanup memblock_free interface
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] memblock: cleanup memblock_free interface
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] memblock: cleanup memblock_free interface
- From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] xen/x86: free_p2m_page: use memblock_free_ptr() to free a virtual pointer
- From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] memblock: cleanup memblock_free interface
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] xen/x86: free_p2m_page: use memblock_free_ptr() to free a virtual pointer
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] arch_numa: simplify numa_distance allocation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] memblock: cleanup memblock_free interface
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation, dt, numa: Add note to empty NUMA node
- From: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] efi: Change down_interruptible() in virt_efi_reset_system() to down_trylock()
- From: Zhang Jianhua <chris.zjh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation, dt, numa: Add note to empty NUMA node
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Documentation, dt, numa: Add note to empty NUMA node
- From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V3 09/22] LoongArch: Add boot and setup routines
- From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH V3 09/22] LoongArch: Add boot and setup routines
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/5] efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and corresponding structures
- From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 38/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 38/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 38/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report
- From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/5] efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and corresponding structures
- From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ARM: decompressor: Avoid UNPREDICTABLE NOP encoding
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] [RFC] x86: Export information about hardware memory encryption to sysfs
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Export information about hardware memory encryption to sysfs
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] mm: Introduce a function to check for confidential computing features
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Peter Gonda <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Peter Gonda <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Peter Gonda <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] ARM: decompressor: Avoid UNPREDICTABLE NOP encoding
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] mm: Introduce a function to check for confidential computing features
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 8/8] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 7/8] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 6/8] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/8] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of cc_platform_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/8] mm: Introduce a function to check for confidential computing features
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/8] x86/ioremap: Selectively build arch override encryption functions
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/8] Implement generic cc_platform_has() helper function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 37/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to derive key
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 38/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] ARM: decompressor: Avoid UNPREDICTABLE NOP encoding
- From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 37/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to derive key
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 36/38] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5][RFC] efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and corresponding structures
- From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5][RFC] efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and corresponding structures
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5][RFC] efi: Introduce EFI_FIRMWARE_MANAGEMENT_CAPSULE_HEADER and corresponding structures
- From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 36/38] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 36/38] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Documentation, dt, numa: Add note to empty NUMA node
- From: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 35/38] x86/sev: Register SNP guest request platform device
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 35/38] x86/sev: Register SNP guest request platform device
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Increasing EFI_MMAP_NR_SLACK_SLOTS
- From: Víctor Gonzalo <victor.gonzalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 35/38] x86/sev: Register SNP guest request platform device
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] virt: Add sev_secret module to expose confidential computing secrets
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 35/38] x86/sev: Register SNP guest request platform device
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow access to confidential computing secret area in SEV guests
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow access to confidential computing secret area in SEV guests
- From: James Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow access to confidential computing secret area in SEV guests
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow access to confidential computing secret area in SEV guests
- From: James Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow access to confidential computing secret area in SEV guests
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow access to confidential computing secret area in SEV guests
- From: James Bottomley <jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] virt: Add sev_secret module to expose confidential computing secrets
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] Allow access to confidential computing secret area in SEV guests
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 28/38] x86/compressed/64: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handler
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2] efi/libstub: x86/mixed: increase supported argument count
- From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2] efi/libstub: x86/mixed: increase supported argument count
- From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4 v2] efi/libstub: x86/mixed: increase supported argument count
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4 v2] efi/libstub: measure loaded initrd info into the TPM
- From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4 v2] efi/libstub: consolidate initrd handling across architectures
- From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4 v2] efi/libstub: x86/mixed: increase supported argument count
- From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4 v2] efi/libstub: add prototype of efi_tcg2_protocol::hash_log_extend_event()
- From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4 v2] efi/libstub: measure initrd data loaded by the EFI stub
- From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [efi:urgent] BUILD SUCCESS adcc9645e4f3d38505c317649dc2f20a484852f6
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 38/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] efi_loader: Omit memory with "no-map" when returning memory map.
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] efi/cper: use stack buffer for error record decoding
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 37/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to derive key
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 28/38] x86/compressed/64: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handler
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 23/38] x86/head/64: set up a startup %gs for stack protector
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 38/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 37/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to derive key
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 38/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 37/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to derive key
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] efi_loader: Omit memory with "no-map" when returning memory map.
- From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 35/38] x86/sev: Register SNP guest request platform device
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 35/38] x86/sev: Register SNP guest request platform device
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 30/38] x86/compressed/64: store Confidential Computing blob address in bootparams
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 28/38] x86/compressed/64: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handler
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] lockdown,selinux: fix wrong subject in some SELinux lockdown checks
- From: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [efitools PATCH 1/1] Make.rules: enable building on riscv64
- From: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 23/38] x86/head/64: set up a startup %gs for stack protector
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 30/38] x86/compressed/64: store Confidential Computing blob address in bootparams
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 29/38] x86/boot: add a pointer to Confidential Computing blob in bootparams
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 28/38] x86/compressed/64: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handler
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 23/38] x86/head/64: set up a startup %gs for stack protector
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [efi:urgent] BUILD SUCCESS 07b98091e0ab5049542997f6fbc08f98efa2ec1d
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2: 1/1] efi/libstub: "Exiting bootservices" message
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2: 1/1] efi/libstub: "Exiting bootservices" message
- From: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] efi/libstub: "Exiting bootservices" message
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] efi/libstub: "Exiting bootservices" message
- From: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [efi:next] BUILD SUCCESS 1be72c8e0786727df375f11c8178ce7e65eea20e
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 33/38] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 33/38] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 33/38] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 33/38] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 33/38] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 33/38] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 33/38] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 33/38] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 17/38] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 31/38] x86/compressed/64: add identity mapping for Confidential Computing blob
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] EFI updates for v5.15
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 30/38] x86/compressed/64: store Confidential Computing blob address in bootparams
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] efi: cper: check section header more appropriately
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] eif/capsule-pstore: Add capsule pstore backend
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 29/38] x86/boot: add a pointer to Confidential Computing blob in bootparams
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 28/38] x86/compressed/64: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handler
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 26/38] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI config table access to common code
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 23/38] x86/head/64: set up a startup %gs for stack protector
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 23/38] x86/head/64: set up a startup %gs for stack protector
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 23/38] x86/head/64: set up a startup %gs for stack protector
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 26/38] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI config table access to common code
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 23/38] x86/head/64: set up a startup %gs for stack protector
- From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 23/38] x86/head/64: set up a startup %gs for stack protector
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 17/38] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 17/38] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 17/38] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 3/5] EFI: Introduce the new AMD Memory Encryption GUID.
- From: Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] x86/sev: Remove do_early_exception() forward declarations
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] x86/sev: Remove do_early_exception() forward declarations
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] virt: Add sev_secret module to expose confidential computing secrets
- From: Andrew Scull <ascull@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 13/38] x86/sev: Register GHCB memory when SEV-SNP is active
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 11/38] x86/compressed: Add helper for validating pages in the decompression stage
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 07/38] x86/sev: Add support for hypervisor feature VMGEXIT
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 07/38] x86/sev: Add support for hypervisor feature VMGEXIT
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 13/38] x86/sev: Register GHCB memory when SEV-SNP is active
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 11/38] x86/compressed: Add helper for validating pages in the decompression stage
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] efi: cper: check section header more appropriately
- From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 v5 07/38] x86/sev: Add support for hypervisor feature VMGEXIT
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 24/36] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI config table access to common code
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 22/36] x86/sev: move MSR-based VMGEXITs for CPUID to helper
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] partitions/efi: Support non-standard GPT location
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] partitions/efi: Support non-standard GPT location
- From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] virt: Add sev_secret module to expose confidential computing secrets
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 38/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to get extended report
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 36/38] virt: Add SEV-SNP guest driver
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 33/38] x86/sev: Provide support for SNP guest request NAEs
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 32/38] x86/sev: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handlers
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 37/38] virt: sevguest: Add support to derive key
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 21/38] KVM: SVM: Update the SEV-ES save area mapping
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 35/38] x86/sev: Register SNP guest request platform device
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 31/38] x86/compressed/64: add identity mapping for Confidential Computing blob
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 20/38] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping for the GHCB save area
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 29/38] x86/boot: add a pointer to Confidential Computing blob in bootparams
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 19/38] KVM: SVM: Create a separate mapping for the SEV-ES save area
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 25/38] KVM: x86: move lookup of indexed CPUID leafs to helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 18/38] KVM: SVM: Define sev_features and vmpl field in the VMSA
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 28/38] x86/compressed/64: enable SEV-SNP-validated CPUID in #VC handler
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 34/38] x86/sev: Add snp_msg_seqno() helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 30/38] x86/compressed/64: store Confidential Computing blob address in bootparams
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 24/38] x86/sev: move MSR-based VMGEXITs for CPUID to helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 17/38] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 27/38] x86/boot: Add Confidential Computing type to setup_data
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 16/38] x86/kernel: Validate rom memory before accessing when SEV-SNP is active
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 10/38] x86/sev: Check the vmpl level
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 23/38] x86/head/64: set up a startup %gs for stack protector
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 06/38] x86/sev: Save the negotiated GHCB version
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 11/38] x86/compressed: Add helper for validating pages in the decompression stage
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 09/38] x86/sev: Add a helper for the PVALIDATE instruction
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 26/38] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI config table access to common code
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 15/38] x86/kernel: Make the bss.decrypted section shared in RMP table
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 14/38] x86/sev: Add helper for validating pages in early enc attribute changes
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 08/38] x86/sev: Check SEV-SNP features support
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 07/38] x86/sev: Add support for hypervisor feature VMGEXIT
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 22/38] x86/sev: Use SEV-SNP AP creation to start secondary CPUs
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 13/38] x86/sev: Register GHCB memory when SEV-SNP is active
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 05/38] x86/sev: Define the Linux specific guest termination reasons
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 12/38] x86/compressed: Register GHCB memory when SEV-SNP is active
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 04/38] x86/head64: Carve out the guest encryption postprocessing into a helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 03/38] x86/sev: Get rid of excessive use of defines
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 02/38] x86/sev: Shorten GHCB terminate macro names
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 01/38] x86/mm: Add sev_feature_enabled() helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH Part1 v5 00/38] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Guest Support
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 40/40] KVM: SVM: Support SEV-SNP AP Creation NAE event
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: x86: invert KVM_HYPERCALL to default to VMMCALL
- From: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Enable MMC_CAP2_ALT_GPT_TEGRA
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Implement alternative_gpt_sector()
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 22/36] x86/sev: move MSR-based VMGEXITs for CPUID to helper
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 24/36] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI config table access to common code
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 4/4] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Enable MMC_CAP2_ALT_GPT_TEGRA
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 3/4] mmc: block: Support alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 2/4] partitions/efi: Support non-standard GPT location
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 1/4] block: Add alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 0/4] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: x86: invert KVM_HYPERCALL to default to VMMCALL
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: x86: invert KVM_HYPERCALL to default to VMMCALL
- From: "Kalra, Ashish" <Ashish.Kalra@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: x86: invert KVM_HYPERCALL to default to VMMCALL
- From: "Kalra, Ashish" <Ashish.Kalra@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: x86: invert KVM_HYPERCALL to default to VMMCALL
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Implement alternative_gpt_sector()
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 24/36] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI config table access to common code
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 22/36] x86/sev: move MSR-based VMGEXITs for CPUID to helper
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 22/36] x86/sev: move MSR-based VMGEXITs for CPUID to helper
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] partitions/efi: Support non-standard GPT location
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 24/36] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI config table access to common code
- From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Implement alternative_gpt_sector()
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] virt: Add sev_secret module to expose confidential computing secrets
- From: Andrew Scull <ascull@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 25/36] x86/boot: Add Confidential Computing type to setup_data
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 24/36] x86/compressed/acpi: move EFI config table access to common code
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 23/36] KVM: x86: move lookup of indexed CPUID leafs to helper
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 22/36] x86/sev: move MSR-based VMGEXITs for CPUID to helper
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 21/36] x86/head/64: set up a startup %gs for stack protector
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Implement alternative_gpt_sector()
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] partitions/efi: Support non-standard GPT location
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] block: Add alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 5/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Enable MMC_CAP2_ALT_GPT_SECTOR
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 4/5] mmc: block: Support alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 3/5] mmc: core: Add raw_boot_mult field to mmc_ext_csd
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 2/5] partitions/efi: Support non-standard GPT location
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 1/5] block: Add alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 0/5] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Implement alternative_gpt_sector()
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Implement alternative_gpt_sector()
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Implement alternative_gpt_sector()
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 20/36] x86/sev: Use SEV-SNP AP creation to start secondary CPUs
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Implement alternative_gpt_sector()
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] block: Add alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] partitions/efi: Support non-standard GPT location
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] mmc: block: Support alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Implement alternative_gpt_sector()
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] mmc: block: Support alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] partitions/efi: Support non-standard GPT location
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] block: Add alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 5/5] partitions/efi: Support non-standard GPT location
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 4/5] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Implement alternative_gpt_sector()
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 3/5] mmc: core: Add raw_boot_mult field to mmc_ext_csd
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 2/5] mmc: block: Support alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 1/5] block: Add alternative_gpt_sector() operation
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 0/5] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 20/36] x86/sev: Use SEV-SNP AP creation to start secondary CPUs
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 15/36] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 15/36] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 20/36] x86/sev: Use SEV-SNP AP creation to start secondary CPUs
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 15/36] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 15/36] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 16/36] KVM: SVM: define new SEV_FEATURES field in the VMCB Save State Area
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 15/36] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 16/36] KVM: SVM: define new SEV_FEATURES field in the VMCB Save State Area
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 16/36] KVM: SVM: define new SEV_FEATURES field in the VMCB Save State Area
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 15/36] x86/mm: Add support to validate memory when changing C-bit
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] partitions/efi: Support NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] partitions/efi: Support NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] partitions/efi: Support NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: block: Add mmc_bdev_to_card() helper
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Typo in file include/linux/efi.h
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] partitions/efi: Support NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] partitions/efi: Support NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] partitions/efi: Support NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: block: Add mmc_bdev_to_card() helper
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] isystem: ship and use stdarg.h
- From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 3/3] partitions/efi: Support NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: block: Add mmc_bdev_to_card() helper
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 1/3] mmc: core: Add raw_boot_mult field to mmc_ext_csd
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 0/3] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] virt: Add sev_secret module to expose confidential computing secrets
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] x86/ioremap: Selectively build arch override encryption functions
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 13/36] x86/kernel: Make the bss.decrypted section shared in RMP table
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 12/12] s390/mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/12] x86/sev: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/12] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/12] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/12] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/12] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/12] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/12] x86/ioremap: Selectively build arch override encryption functions
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/12] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 33/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle MSR based Page State Change VMGEXIT
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 09/36] x86/compressed: Add helper for validating pages in the decompression stage
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 08/36] x86/sev: check the vmpl level
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 09/36] x86/compressed: Add helper for validating pages in the decompression stage
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 08/36] x86/sev: check the vmpl level
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] virt: Add sev_secret module to expose confidential computing secrets
- From: Andrew Scull <ascull@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 12/36] x86/sev: Add helper for validating pages in early enc attribute changes
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 10/36] x86/compressed: Register GHCB memory when SEV-SNP is active
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 09/36] x86/compressed: Add helper for validating pages in the decompression stage
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 08/36] x86/sev: check the vmpl level
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: pass a gendisk instead of block_device in the partitioning code
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: store a gendisk in struct parsed_partitions
- From: Stefan Haberland <sth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 05/36] x86/sev: Define the Linux specific guest termination reasons
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 05/36] x86/sev: Define the Linux specific guest termination reasons
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] block: pass a gendisk to bdev_resize_partition
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] block: pass a gendisk to bdev_del_partition
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] block: pass a gendisk to bdev_add_partition
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] block: store a gendisk in struct parsed_partitions
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- pass a gendisk instead of block_device in the partitioning code
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 05/36] x86/sev: Define the Linux specific guest termination reasons
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 04/36] x86/mm: Add sev_feature_enabled() helper
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 03/36] x86/sev: Add support for hypervisor feature VMGEXIT
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 03/36] x86/sev: Add support for hypervisor feature VMGEXIT
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 02/36] x86/sev: Save the negotiated GHCB version
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 02/36] x86/sev: Save the negotiated GHCB version
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 05/36] x86/sev: Define the Linux specific guest termination reasons
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 04/36] x86/mm: Add sev_feature_enabled() helper
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 03/36] x86/sev: Add support for hypervisor feature VMGEXIT
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 02/36] x86/sev: Save the negotiated GHCB version
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 02/36] x86/sev: Save the negotiated GHCB version
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] efi/libstub: Copy confidential computing secret area
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] virt: Add sev_secret module to expose confidential computing secrets
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] efi: Reserve confidential computing secret area
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] Allow access to confidential computing secret area in SEV guests
- From: Dov Murik <dovmurik@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function
- From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan" <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] isystem: ship and use stdarg.h
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Enable Linux guests on Hyper-V on ARM64
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Enable Linux guests on Hyper-V on ARM64
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v12 5/5] Drivers: hv: Enable Hyper-V code to be built on ARM64
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v12 5/5] Drivers: hv: Enable Hyper-V code to be built on ARM64
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v12 0/5] Enable Linux guests on Hyper-V on ARM64
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Enable Linux guests on Hyper-V on ARM64
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v12 0/5] Enable Linux guests on Hyper-V on ARM64
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v12 5/5] Drivers: hv: Enable Hyper-V code to be built on ARM64
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 4/5] arm64: efi: Export screen_info
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 5/5] Drivers: hv: Enable Hyper-V code to be built on ARM64
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 3/5] arm64: hyperv: Initialize hypervisor on boot
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 1/5] arm64: hyperv: Add Hyper-V hypercall and register access utilities
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 2/5] arm64: hyperv: Add panic handler
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v12 0/5] Enable Linux guests on Hyper-V on ARM64
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [efi:urgent] BUILD SUCCESS c32ac11da3f83bb42b986702a9b92f0a14ed4182
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 20/40] KVM: SVM: Make AVIC backing, VMSA and VMCB memory allocation SNP safe
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] EFI fixes for v5.14-rc4
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] isystem: ship and use stdarg.h
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Fix EFI loader kernel image allocation
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v11 3/5] arm64: hyperv: Initialize hypervisor on boot
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 0/5] Enable Linux guests on Hyper-V on ARM64
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 3/5] arm64: hyperv: Initialize hypervisor on boot
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 0/5] Enable Linux guests on Hyper-V on ARM64
- From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 3/5] arm64: hyperv: Initialize hypervisor on boot
- From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v11 0/5] Enable Linux guests on Hyper-V on ARM64
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] arm64: Fix EFI loader kernel image allocation
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] efi/arm64: work around Image placement issues
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] efi/arm64: work around Image placement issues
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/11] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 09/11] x86/sev: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/11] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] isystem: ship and use stdarg.h
- From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/3] partitions/efi: Support NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/3] mmc: block: Add mmc_bdev_to_card() helper
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/3] mmc: core: Add raw_boot_mult field to mmc_ext_csd
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/3] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] partitions/efi: Support NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] mmc: core: Add raw_boot_mult field to mmc_ext_csd
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/3] partitions/efi: Support NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] mmc: block: Add mmc_bdev_to_card() helper
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/3] Support EFI partition on NVIDIA Tegra devices
- From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 10/40] x86/fault: Add support to handle the RMP fault for user address
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 07/40] x86/sev: Split the physmap when adding the page in RMP table
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 10/40] x86/fault: Add support to handle the RMP fault for user address
- From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 07/40] x86/sev: Split the physmap when adding the page in RMP table
- From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function
- From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] efi: sysfb_efi: fix build when EFI is not set
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] efi: sysfb_efi: fix build when EFI is not set
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/11] s390/mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/11] x86/sev: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/11] mm: Remove the now unused mem_encrypt_active() function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_es_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/11] treewide: Replace the use of mem_encrypt_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/11] x86/sev: Replace occurrences of sev_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/11] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme_active() with prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/11] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/11] x86/sev: Add an x86 version of prot_guest_has()
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/11] mm: Introduce a function to check for virtualization protection features
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/11] Implement generic prot_guest_has() helper function
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v11 2/5] arm64: hyperv: Add panic handler
- From: Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v11 3/5] arm64: hyperv: Initialize hypervisor on boot
- From: Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] efi: sysfb_efi: fix build when EFI is not set
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 15/21] efi/mokvar: Reserve the table only if it is in boot services data
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 13/17] efi/mokvar: Reserve the table only if it is in boot services data
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] efi: sysfb_efi: fix build when EFI is not set
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] efi: sysfb_efi: fix build when EFI is not set
- From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
- [efi:urgent] BUILD SUCCESS 6dec88b1f3caee8c8460ac199a6c6ea702c85603
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] efi: sysfb_efi: fix build when EFI is not set
- From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] efi: sysfb_efi: fix build when EFI is not set
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] efi: sysfb_efi: fix build when EFI is not set
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 4/4] efi/libstub: arm64: Double check image alignment at entry
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 3/4] efi/libstub: arm64: Warn when efi_random_alloc() fails
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/4] efi/libstub: arm64: Relax 2M alignment again for relocatable kernels
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/4] efi/libstub: arm64: Force Image reallocation if BSS was not reserved
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 0/4] efi/arm64: work around Image placement issues
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] efi/libstub: arm64: Force Image reallocation if BSS was not reserved
- From: "Herrenschmidt, Benjamin" <benh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] efi/libstub: arm64: Force Image reallocation if BSS was not reserved
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] efistub: arm64: relax 2M alignment again for relocatable kernels
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] efi/libstub: arm64: Force Image reallocation if BSS was not reserved
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] efi/arm64: work around Image placement issues
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] efistub: arm64: relax 2M alignment again for relocatable kernels
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [efi:urgent] BUILD SUCCESS 5bb60b28ce5bee48838c3fdc667c7247e722b34d
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] efistub: arm64: relax 2M alignment again for relocatable kernels
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] RISC-V: load initrd wherever it fits into memory
- From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 37/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle the RMP nested page fault
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 40/40] KVM: SVM: Support SEV-SNP AP Creation NAE event
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 26/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH command
- From: Marc Orr <marcorr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 40/40] KVM: SVM: Support SEV-SNP AP Creation NAE event
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 39/40] KVM: SVM: Use a VMSA physical address variable for populating VMCB
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 3/5] arm64: hyperv: Initialize hypervisor on boot
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 2/5] arm64: hyperv: Add panic handler
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] Drivers: hv: Enable Hyper-V code to be built on ARM64
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms
- From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms
- From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms
- From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 39/40] KVM: SVM: Use a VMSA physical address variable for populating VMCB
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 40/40] KVM: SVM: Support SEV-SNP AP Creation NAE event
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 37/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle the RMP nested page fault
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 05/40] x86/sev: Add RMP entry lookup helpers
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 37/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle the RMP nested page fault
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 38/40] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 05/40] x86/sev: Add RMP entry lookup helpers
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [efi:urgent] BUILD SUCCESS 47e1e233e9d822dfda068383fb9a616451bda703
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 27/40] KVM: X86: Add kvm_x86_ops to get the max page level for the TDP
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 27/40] KVM: X86: Add kvm_x86_ops to get the max page level for the TDP
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms
- From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 38/40] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 20/40] KVM: SVM: Make AVIC backing, VMSA and VMCB memory allocation SNP safe
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 37/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle the RMP nested page fault
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 38/40] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 35/40] KVM: Add arch hooks to track the host write to guest memory
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: efi: kaslr: Fix boot failure if efi_random_alloc() fails
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] RISC-V: load initrd wherever it fits into memory
- From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 5/5] Drivers: hv: Enable Hyper-V code to be built on ARM64
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 4/5] arm64: efi: Export screen_info
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 3/5] arm64: hyperv: Initialize hypervisor on boot
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 2/5] arm64: hyperv: Add panic handler
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 0/5] Enable Linux guests on Hyper-V on ARM64
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: efi: kaslr: Fix boot failure if efi_random_alloc() fails
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v11 1/5] arm64: hyperv: Add Hyper-V hypercall and register access utilities
- From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 38/40] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: efi: kaslr: Fix boot failure if efi_random_alloc() fails
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: efi: kaslr: Fix boot failure if efi_random_alloc() fails
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: efi: kaslr: Fix boot failure if efi_random_alloc() fails
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms
- From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: efi: kaslr: Fix boot failure if efi_random_alloc() fails
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: efi: kaslr: Fix boot failure if efi_random_alloc() fails
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: efi: kaslr: Fix occasional random alloc (and boot) failure
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fixes for v5.14-rc2
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] arm64: efi: kaslr: Fix boot failure if efi_random_alloc() fails
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] arm64: efi: kaslr: Fix occasional random alloc (and boot) failure
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] EFI fixes for v5.14-rc2
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 35/40] KVM: Add arch hooks to track the host write to guest memory
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 37/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle the RMP nested page fault
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 38/40] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 24/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE command
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 24/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE command
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 24/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE command
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 22/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SNP_INIT command
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 26/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH command
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 32/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle GHCB GPA register VMGEXIT
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 26/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH command
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- [efi:urgent] BUILD SUCCESS 7c33940e16b6cc297c5648b65180451b404b8a5e
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 26/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH command
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 33/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle MSR based Page State Change VMGEXIT
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 33/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle MSR based Page State Change VMGEXIT
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 26/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH command
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 26/40] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH command
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 34/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle Page State Change VMGEXIT
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 33/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle MSR based Page State Change VMGEXIT
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] firmware: dmi_scan: Make it work in kexec'ed kernel
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] firmware: dmi_scan: Make it work in kexec'ed kernel
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] efi/mokvar: Reserve the table only if it is in boot services data
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] allow simple{fb, drm} drivers to be used on non-x86 EFI platforms
- From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
- [efi:urgent] BUILD SUCCESS 2bab693a608bdf614b9fcd44083c5100f34b9f77
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] efi/mokvar: Reserve the table only if it is in boot services data
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 25/40] KVM: SVM: Reclaim the guest pages when SEV-SNP VM terminates
- From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 32/40] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle GHCB GPA register VMGEXIT
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 31/40] KVM: X86: update page-fault trace to log the 64-bit error code
- From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel Development]
[Security]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Tools]
[Linux MIPS]
[Linux S390]
[Bugtraq]
[Share Photos]>
[Fedora ARM]