Re: [PATCH 2/2] ghes_edac: refactor error status fields decoding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07.12.21 11:19:05, Shuai Xue wrote:

> @@ -285,6 +285,48 @@ int cper_dimm_err_location(struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg)
>  	return n;
>  }
>  
> +const char *cper_mem_err_status_str(u64 status)

[...]

Same here, add an EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for the function.

> --- a/include/linux/cper.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cper.h
> @@ -568,7 +568,8 @@ void cper_print_proc_arm(const char *pfx,
>  			 const struct cper_sec_proc_arm *proc);
>  void cper_print_proc_ia(const char *pfx,
>  			const struct cper_sec_proc_ia *proc);
> -int cper_mem_err_location(struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg);
> -int cper_dimm_err_location(struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg);
> +int cper_mem_err_location(const struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg);
> +int cper_dimm_err_location(const struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg);

Do we really need that 'const' here?

> +const char *cper_mem_err_status_str(u64 status);

The function i/f is different compared to the others, though the
purpose is the same. Let's use same style:

 int cper_mem_err_status(const struct cper_mem_err_compact *mem, char *msg);

-Robert



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux