On 2021-12-17 17:24:43 -0600, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>
> On 12/17/21 2:47 PM, Venu Busireddy wrote:
>
> >> * the caches.
> >> */
> >> - if ((set | clr) & _PAGE_ENC)
> >> + if ((set | clr) & _PAGE_ENC) {
> >> clflush_page(address);
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * If the encryption attribute is being cleared, then change
> >> + * the page state to shared in the RMP table.
> >> + */
> >> + if (clr)
> > This function is also called by set_page_non_present() with clr set to
> > _PAGE_PRESENT. Do we want to change the page state to shared even when
> > the page is not present? If not, shouldn't the check be (clr & _PAGE_ENC)?
>
> I am not able to follow your comment. Here we only pay attention to the
> encryption attribute, if encryption attribute is getting cleared then
> make PSC. In the case ov set_page_non_present(), the outer if() block
> will return false. Am I missing something ?
You are right. I missed the outer check.
> > The page is not "added", right? Shouldn't we just say:
>
> Technically, PSC modifies the RMP entry, so I should use that instead
> of calling "added".
>
>
> > Validate the page so that it is consistent with the RMP entry.
>
> Yes, I am okay with it.
Thanks,
Venu
