On 10/29/21, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But, I don't think what you've proposed here fits very well there. The > ->cpu_local thing looks totally broken. It's entirely unclear what > users are supposed to do when the crypto_capable file is not present. > Yes, I apologize, it was a misunderstanding between myself and the team that reviewing the patch before it was sent. The idea behind that code was to do another thing that we decided to drop. The final version should have this file for every node in the system.
