Linux Arch
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [PATCH v9 3/9] set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 2/9] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 1/9] mm: add definition of PMD_PAGE_ORDER
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v9 0/9] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:asm-generic-fixes] BUILD SUCCESS cef397038167ac15d085914493d6c86385773709
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:master] BUILD SUCCESS 8eb42bcea5aeb292101a9e4fd4becdc9f4728bb1
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:asm-generic-mmu-context] BUILD SUCCESS c3634425ff9454510876a26e9e9738788bb88abd
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] memfd_secret.2: New page describing memfd_secret() system call
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v24 00/12] Landlock LSM
- From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 01/12] landlock: Add object management
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 01/12] landlock: Add object management
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] memfd_secret.2: New page describing memfd_secret() system call
- From: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/10] Migrate syscall entry/exit work to SYSCALL_WORK flagset
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/10] tracepoints: Migrate to use SYSCALL_WORK flag
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/10] x86: Reclaim unused x86 TI flags
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/10] entry: Drop usage of TIF flags in the generic syscall code
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/10] audit: Migrate to use SYSCALL_WORK flag
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/10] ptrace: Migrate TIF_SYSCALL_EMU to use SYSCALL_WORK flag
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/10] ptrace: Migrate to use SYSCALL_TRACE flag
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/10] seccomp: Migrate to use SYSCALL_WORK flag
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/10] entry: Expose helpers to migrate TIF to SYSCALL_WORK flags
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/10] entry: Wire up syscall_work in common entry code
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/10] x86: Expose syscall_work field in thread_info
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib: Introduce copy_from_back()
- From: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zengzhaoxiu@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib: Introduce copy_from_back()
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf/mm: Fix PERF_SAMPLE_*_PAGE_SIZE
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf/mm: Fix PERF_SAMPLE_*_PAGE_SIZE
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] syscalls: Fix file comments for syscalls implemented in kernel/sys.c
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf/mm: Fix PERF_SAMPLE_*_PAGE_SIZE
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib: Introduce copy_from_back()
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf/mm: Fix PERF_SAMPLE_*_PAGE_SIZE
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf/mm: Fix PERF_SAMPLE_*_PAGE_SIZE
- From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] syscalls: Fix file comments for syscalls implemented in kernel/sys.c
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf/mm: Fix PERF_SAMPLE_*_PAGE_SIZE
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf/mm: Fix PERF_SAMPLE_*_PAGE_SIZE
- From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf/core: Fix arch_perf_get_page_size()
- From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] x86/hyperv: provide a bunch of helper functions
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] asm-generic/atomic64: Add support for ARCH_ATOMIC
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] Migrate syscall entry/exit work to SYSCALL_WORK flagset
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/10] tracepoints: Migrate to use SYSCALL_WORK flag
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/10] kernel: entry: Wire up syscall_work in common entry code
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/10] seccomp: Migrate to use SYSCALL_WORK flag
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] kernel: entry: Expose helpers to migrate TIF to SYSCALL_WORK flags
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] secretmem: add memcg accounting
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 8/9] arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call were relevant
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arch: pgtable: define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS where needed
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arch: pgtable: define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS where needed
- From: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] kernel: entry: Expose helpers to migrate TIF to SYSCALL_WORK flags
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:asm-generic-cleanup] BUILD SUCCESS 8d0dd23c6c78d140ed2132f523592ddb4cea839f
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:master] BUILD SUCCESS 129eb82bd5f2cc251d9581e18d7541e74b5dd8e8
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:asm-generic-fixes] BUILD SUCCESS 562a2b4039a046130daf3eeda0db96e23980ca36
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/10] x86: Reclaim unused x86 TI flags
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/10] kernel: entry: Drop usage of TIF flags in the generic syscall code
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/10] audit: Migrate to use SYSCALL_WORK flag
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/10] ptrace: Migrate TIF_SYSCALL_EMU to use SYSCALL_WORK flag
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/10] tracepoints: Migrate to use SYSCALL_WORK flag
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/10] seccomp: Migrate to use SYSCALL_WORK flag
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/10] ptrace: Migrate to use SYSCALL_TRACE flag
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/10] kernel: entry: Wire up syscall_work in common entry code
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/10] kernel: entry: Expose helpers to migrate TIF to SYSCALL_WORK flags
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/10] x86: Expose syscall_work field in thread_info
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/10] Migrate syscall entry/exit work to SYSCALL_WORK flagset
- From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] secretmem: add memcg accounting
- From: Roman Gushchin <guroan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] x86/hyperv: provide a bunch of helper functions
- From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] arch: pgtable: define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS where needed
- From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] x86/hyperv: provide a bunch of helper functions
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: rewrite atomics to use ARCH_ATOMIC
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/17] x86/hyperv: extract partition ID from Microsoft Hypervisor if necessary
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] arch: pgtable: define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS where needed
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] linker-section array fix and clean ups
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf/mm: Fix PERF_SAMPLE_*_PAGE_SIZE
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 3/9] set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 8/9] arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call were relevant
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] mm: Introduce pXX_leaf_size()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] perf/core: Fix arch_perf_get_page_size()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] arm64/mm: Implement pXX_leaf_size() support
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] sparc64/mm: Implement pXX_leaf_size() support
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] mm/gup: Provide gup_get_pte() more generic
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm: Introduce pXX_leaf_size()
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/5] perf/mm: Fix PERF_SAMPLE_*_PAGE_SIZE
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 08/14] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 07/14] sched: Introduce restrict_cpus_allowed_ptr() to limit task CPU affinity
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 06/14] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 09/14] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 10/14] sched: Introduce arch_cpu_allowed_mask() to limit fallback rq selection
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 14/14] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 13/14] arm64: Implement arch_cpu_allowed_mask()
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 12/14] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 11/14] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on arch_cpu_allowed_mask()
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 05/14] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 04/14] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 03/14] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 02/14] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 01/14] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 00/14] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 6/9] secretmem: add memcg accounting
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] syscalls: Fix file comments for syscalls implemented in kernel/sys.c
- From: Tal Zussman <tz2294@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 02/12] landlock: Add ruleset and domain management
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 01/12] landlock: Add object management
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 03/12] landlock: Set up the security framework and manage credentials
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 05/12] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 07/12] landlock: Support filesystem access-control
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 11/12] samples/landlock: Add a sandbox manager example
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 12/12] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 10/12] selftests/landlock: Add user space tests
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 08/12] landlock: Add syscall implementations
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 09/12] arch: Wire up Landlock syscalls
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 06/12] fs,security: Add sb_delete hook
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 04/12] landlock: Add ptrace restrictions
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v24 00/12] Landlock LSM
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] x86/hyperv: provide a bunch of helper functions
- From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 07/17] x86/hyperv: extract partition ID from Microsoft Hypervisor if necessary
- From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] asm-generic/hyperv: change HV_CPU_POWER_MANAGEMENT to HV_CPU_MANAGEMENT
- From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] linker-section array fix and clean ups
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] asm-generic/atomic64: Add support for ARCH_ATOMIC
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] asm-generic/atomic64: Add support for ARCH_ATOMIC
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: rewrite atomics to use ARCH_ATOMIC
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/64s/iommu: don't use atomic_ function on atomic64_t type
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] asm-generic/atomic64: Add support for ARCH_ATOMIC
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] powerpc: convert to use ARCH_ATOMIC
- From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/9] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 01/26] Documentation/x86: Add CET description
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 07/26] x86/mm: Remove _PAGE_DIRTY_HW from kernel RO pages
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 3/7] x86/cet/ibt: Handle signals for Indirect Branch Tracking
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 03/26] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce CET MSR XSAVES supervisor states
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 1/7] x86/cet/ibt: Add Kconfig option for user-mode Indirect Branch Tracking
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 0/7] Control-flow Enforcement: Indirect Branch Tracking
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 2/7] x86/cet/ibt: User-mode Indirect Branch Tracking support
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 5/7] x86/cet/ibt: Update arch_prctl functions for Indirect Branch Tracking
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 4/7] x86/cet/ibt: ELF header parsing for Indirect Branch Tracking
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 6/7] x86/vdso/32: Add ENDBR32 to __kernel_vsyscall entry point
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 7/7] x86/vdso: Insert endbr32/endbr64 to vDSO
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 08/26] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_COW
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 05/26] x86/cet/shstk: Add Kconfig option for user-mode Shadow Stack
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 02/26] x86/cpufeatures: Add CET CPU feature flags for Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET)
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 06/26] x86/mm: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_HW
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 13/26] x86/mm: Shadow Stack page fault error checking
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 12/26] mm: Introduce VM_SHSTK for shadow stack memory
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 11/26] x86/mm: Update ptep_set_wrprotect() and pmdp_set_wrprotect() for transition from _PAGE_DIRTY_HW to _PAGE_COW
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 14/26] x86/mm: Update maybe_mkwrite() for shadow stack
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 09/26] drm/i915/gvt: Change _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_DIRTY_BITS
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 15/26] mm: Fixup places that call pte_mkwrite() directly
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 04/26] x86/cet: Add control-protection fault handler
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 10/26] x86/mm: Update pte_modify for _PAGE_COW
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 16/26] mm: Add guard pages around a shadow stack.
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 21/26] x86/cet/shstk: Handle signals for shadow stack
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 26/26] mm: Introduce PROT_SHSTK for shadow stack
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 18/26] mm: Update can_follow_write_pte() for shadow stack
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 19/26] mm: Re-introduce vm_flags to do_mmap()
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 20/26] x86/cet/shstk: User-mode shadow stack support
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 25/26] x86/cet/shstk: Add arch_prctl functions for shadow stack
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 17/26] mm/mmap: Add shadow stack pages to memory accounting
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 23/26] ELF: Introduce arch_setup_elf_property()
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 24/26] x86/cet/shstk: Handle thread shadow stack
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 22/26] binfmt_elf: Define GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_AND properties
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v15 00/26] Control-flow Enforcement: Shadow Stack
- From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 9/9] secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 8/9] arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call were relevant
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 7/9] PM: hibernate: disable when there are active secretmem users
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 6/9] secretmem: add memcg accounting
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 5/9] secretmem: use PMD-size pages to amortize direct map fragmentation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 4/9] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 3/9] set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 2/9] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 1/9] mm: add definition of PMD_PAGE_ORDER
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v8 0/9] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add API for dynamic thermal power management
- From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add API for dynamic thermal power management
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add API for dynamic thermal power management
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add API for dynamic thermal power management
- From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
- From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add API for dynamic thermal power management
- From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
- From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched EL0 support
- From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v23 00/12] Landlock LSM
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v23 00/12] Landlock LSM
- From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/6] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/6] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] lib: Introduce copy_from_back()
- From: zengzhaoxiu@xxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5.4 05/85] linkage: Introduce new macros for assembler symbols
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC] proc: get_wchan() stack unwind only makes sense for sleeping/non-self tasks
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
- From: Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v14 02/26] x86/cpufeatures: Add CET CPU feature flags for Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET)
- From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v14 02/26] x86/cpufeatures: Add CET CPU feature flags for Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET)
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v14 02/26] x86/cpufeatures: Add CET CPU feature flags for Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET)
- From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 3/8] tools/memory-model: Document categories of ordering primitives
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v14 02/26] x86/cpufeatures: Add CET CPU feature flags for Control-flow Enforcement Technology (CET)
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/26] Documentation/x86: Add CET description
- From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/26] Documentation/x86: Add CET description
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/26] Documentation/x86: Add CET description
- From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v14 01/26] Documentation/x86: Add CET description
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
- From: Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] linker-section array fix and clean ups
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 3/8] tools/memory-model: Document categories of ordering primitives
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] linker-section array fix and clean ups
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] linker-section array fix and clean ups
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/8] linker-section array fix and clean ups
- From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] ARM: remove set_fs callers and implementation
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] ARM: traps: use get_kernel_nofault instead of set_fs()
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/9] mm/maccess: fix unaligned copy_{from,to}_kernel_nofault
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC] proc: get_wchan() stack unwind only makes sense for sleeping/non-self tasks
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 6/8] tools/memory-model: Add types to litmus tests
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH memory-model 6/8] tools/memory-model: Add types to litmus tests
- From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms
- [PATCH memory-model 4/8] docs/memory-barriers.txt: Fix a typo in CPU MEMORY BARRIERS section
- [PATCH memory-model 6/8] tools/memory-model: Add types to litmus tests
- [PATCH memory-model 7/8] tools/memory-model: Use "buf" and "flag" for message-passing tests
- [PATCH memory-model 8/8] tools/memory-model: Label MP tests' producers and consumers
- [PATCH memory-model 3/8] tools/memory-model: Document categories of ordering primitives
- [PATCH memory-model 2/8] tools/memory-model: Move Documentation description to Documentation/README
- [PATCH memory-model 1/8] tools: memory-model: Document that the LKMM can easily miss control dependencies
- [PATCH memory-model 0/8] LKMM updates for v5.11
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V
- From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
- From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
- From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
- From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/17] x86/hyperv: extract partition ID from Microsoft Hypervisor if necessary
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/17] x86/hyperv: provide a bunch of helper functions
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/17] asm-generic/hyperv: update hv_msi_entry
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 12/17] asm-generic/hyperv: update hv_interrupt_entry
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 14/17] asm-generic/hyperv: import data structures for mapping device interrupts
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 13/17] asm-generic/hyperv: introduce hv_device_id and auxiliary structures
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/17] asm-generic/hyperv: change HV_CPU_POWER_MANAGEMENT to HV_CPU_MANAGEMENT
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 14/21] kprobes: Remove NMI context check
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: get_maintainer.pl bug? (was: Re: [PATCH 0/8] linker-section array fix and clean ups)
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 14/21] kprobes: Remove NMI context check
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: get_maintainer.pl bug? (was: Re: [PATCH 0/8] linker-section array fix and clean ups)
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@xxxxxxxx>
- get_maintainer.pl bug? (was: Re: [PATCH 0/8] linker-section array fix and clean ups)
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 14/21] kprobes: Remove NMI context check
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5.9 182/391] vmlinux.lds.h: Add PGO and AutoFDO input sections
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add API for dynamic thermal power management
- From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 02/12] landlock: Add ruleset and domain management
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 05/12] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 08/12] landlock: Add syscall implementations
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 07/12] landlock: Support filesystem access-control
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 10/12] selftests/landlock: Add user space tests
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 09/12] arch: Wire up Landlock syscalls
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 04/12] landlock: Add ptrace restrictions
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 11/12] samples/landlock: Add a sandbox manager example
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 12/12] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 06/12] fs,security: Add sb_delete hook
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 03/12] landlock: Set up the security framework and manage credentials
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 01/12] landlock: Add object management
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v23 00/12] Landlock LSM
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/8] of: fix linker-section match-table corruption
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/8] earlycon: simplify earlycon-table implementation
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/8] module: drop version-attribute alignment
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/8] init: use type alignment for kernel parameters
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/8] params: drop redundant "unused" attributes
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/8] params: use type alignment for kernel parameters
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/8] params: clean up module-param macros
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/8] module: simplify version-attribute handling
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/8] linker-section array fix and clean ups
- From: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v13 4/8] powerpc/time: Move timebase functions into new asm/timebase.h
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v13 3/8] powerpc/processor: Move cpu_relax() into asm/vdso/processor.h
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v13 6/8] powerpc/vdso: Save and restore TOC pointer on PPC64
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v13 2/8] powerpc/feature: Use CONFIG_PPC64 instead of __powerpc64__ to define possible features
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v13 5/8] powerpc/vdso: Prepare for switching VDSO to generic C implementation.
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v13 8/8] powerpc/vdso: Provide __kernel_clock_gettime64() on vdso32
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v13 7/8] powerpc/vdso: Switch VDSO to generic C implementation.
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v13 1/8] powerpc/feature: Fix CPU_FTRS_ALWAYS by removing CPU_FTRS_GENERIC_32
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v13 0/8] powerpc: switch VDSO to C implementation
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 14/21] kprobes: Remove NMI context check
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 07/12] landlock: Support filesystem access-control
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] compat: remove some compat entry points
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] compat: remove some compat entry points
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: simplify compat_sys_move_pages
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kexec: simplify compat_sys_kexec_load
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 14/21] kprobes: Remove NMI context check
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: kvm: Handle Asymmetric AArch32 systems
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 14/21] kprobes: Remove NMI context check
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: "'Greg KH'" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/4] compat: remove some compat entry points
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: simplify compat numa syscalls
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: simplify compat_sys_move_pages
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/4] kexec: simplify compat_sys_kexec_load
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/4] syscalls: remove compat_alloc_user_space callers
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 14/21] kprobes: Remove NMI context check
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 14/21] kprobes: Remove NMI context check
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 14/21] kprobes: Remove NMI context check
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:master] BUILD SUCCESS 78d127fd689200ff1d62d1f24f6be8dd68250764
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:asm-generic-timers] BUILD SUCCESS 0774a6ed294b963dc76df2d8342ab86d030759ec
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: syscall: always store thread_info->syscall
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] asm-generic: bugfix for v5.10
- From: pr-tracker-bot@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:asm-generic-timers 1/15] arch/arm/Kconfig:271: syntax error
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems
- From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: syscall: always store thread_info->syscall
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] asm-generic: bugfix for v5.10
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems
- From: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/9] ARM: traps: use get_kernel_nofault instead of set_fs()
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/9] ARM: syscall: always store thread_info->syscall
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/9] ARM: oabi-compat: add epoll_pwait handler
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 8/9] ARM: uaccess: add __{get,put}_kernel_nofault
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 9/9] ARM: uaccess: remove set_fs() implementation
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/9] ARM: oabi-compat: rework sys_semtimedop emulation
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 7/9] ARM: oabi-compat: rework fcntl64() emulation
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/9] ARM: oabi-compat: rework epoll_wait/epoll_pwait emulation
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/9] mm/maccess: fix unaligned copy_{from,to}_kernel_nofault
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 0/9] ARM: remove set_fs callers and implementation
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 08/12] landlock: Add syscall implementations
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 08/12] landlock: Add syscall implementations
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 01/12] landlock: Add object management
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 09/18] mips/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 12/18] sparc/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 17/18] mm/highmem: Provide kmap_local*
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 14/18] mm/highmem: Remove the old kmap_atomic cruft
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 13/18] xtensa/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 10/18] nds32/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 02/18] mm/highmem: Un-EXPORT __kmap_atomic_idx()
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 08/18] microblaze/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 01/18] sched: Make migrate_disable/enable() independent of RT
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 16/18] sched: highmem: Store local kmaps in task struct
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 00/18] mm/highmem: Preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 04/18] x86/mm/highmem: Use generic kmap atomic implementation
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 11/18] powerpc/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 06/18] ARM: highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 03/18] highmem: Provide generic variant of kmap_atomic*
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 15/18] io-mapping: Cleanup atomic iomap
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 18/18] io-mapping: Provide iomap_local variant
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 07/18] csky/mm/highmem: Switch to generic kmap atomic
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch V2 05/18] arc/mm/highmem: Use generic kmap atomic implementation
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems
- From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5] x86: add failure injection to get/put/clear_user
- From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 00/12] Landlock LSM
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 12/12] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 08/12] landlock: Add syscall implementations
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 07/12] landlock: Support filesystem access-control
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 02/12] landlock: Add ruleset and domain management
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 01/12] landlock: Add object management
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 06/12] fs,security: Add sb_delete hook
- From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 09/12] arch: Wire up Landlock syscalls
- From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 05/12] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock
- From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:asm-generic-cleanup] BUILD SUCCESS caabdd0f59a9771ed095efe3ad5a08867b976ab2
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:master] BUILD SUCCESS 24a23387c15f34bad2485a9e1c3b7ac6f0fb35a6
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 00/12] Landlock LSM
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 01/12] landlock: Add object management
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 12/12] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 02/12] landlock: Add ruleset and domain management
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 08/12] landlock: Add syscall implementations
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 03/12] landlock: Set up the security framework and manage credentials
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 04/12] landlock: Add ptrace restrictions
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 07/12] landlock: Support filesystem access-control
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v22 06/12] fs,security: Add sb_delete hook
- From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applcations in sysfs
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applcations in sysfs
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applcations in sysfs
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applcations in sysfs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applcations in sysfs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH rc] mm: always have io_remap_pfn_range() set pgprot_decrypted()
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] kselftest: Extend vDSO tests
- From: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applcations in sysfs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applcations in sysfs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] KVM: arm64: Handle Asymmetric AArch32 systems
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 01/12] landlock: Add object management
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 08/12] landlock: Add syscall implementations
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 04/12] landlock: Add ptrace restrictions
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 05/12] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 03/12] landlock: Set up the security framework and manage credentials
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 02/12] landlock: Add ruleset and domain management
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 09/12] arch: Wire up Landlock syscalls
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 12/12] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 06/12] fs,security: Add sb_delete hook
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 10/12] selftests/landlock: Add user space tests
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 11/12] samples/landlock: Add a sandbox manager example
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 07/12] landlock: Support filesystem access-control
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v22 00/12] Landlock LSM
- From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] arm64: Fix redefinition of init_new_context()
- From: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] qspinlock: use signed temporaries for cmpxchg
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] qspinlock: use signed temporaries for cmpxchg
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: mark __{get,put}_user_fn as __always_inline
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] qspinlock: use signed temporaries for cmpxchg
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC v1 09/18] x86/hyperv: provide a bunch of helper functions
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC v1 07/18] x86/hyperv: extract partition ID from Microsoft Hypervisor if necessary
- From: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AMD SME encrpytion and PCI BAR pages to user space
- From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] qspinlock: use signed temporaries for cmpxchg
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/23] arm64: use asm-generic/mmu_context.h for no-op implementations
- From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] asm-generic: mark __{get,put}_user_fn as __always_inline
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: AMD SME encrpytion and PCI BAR pages to user space
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] qspinlock: use signed temporaries for cmpxchg
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] mm: add definition of PMD_PAGE_ORDER
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] qspinlock: use signed temporaries for cmpxchg
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:asm-generic-cleanup] BUILD SUCCESS 6f6573a4044adefbd07f1bd951a2041150e888d7
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:master] BUILD SUCCESS a259218ae60de9d1442c74728fe3a615cd435a19
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- [asm-generic:asm-generic-mmu-context] BUILD SUCCESS 13473b5dccd2f6ee2d9eb4384c0b39a814ffc9c5
- From: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] kselftest: Extend vDSO tests
- From: Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [REGRESSION] mm: process_vm_readv testcase no longer works after compat_prcoess_vm_readv removed
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 34/46] asm-generic/io.h: Fix !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP pci_iounmap() implementation
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [REGRESSION] mm: process_vm_readv testcase no longer works after compat_prcoess_vm_readv removed
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: percpu: avoid Wshadow warning
- From: Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [REGRESSION] mm: process_vm_readv testcase no longer works after compat_prcoess_vm_readv removed
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 62/80] asm-generic/io.h: Fix !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP pci_iounmap() implementation
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.8 106/132] asm-generic/io.h: Fix !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP pci_iounmap() implementation
- From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] kselftest: Extend vDSO tests
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [REGRESSION] mm: process_vm_readv testcase no longer works after compat_prcoess_vm_readv removed
- From: Kyle Huey <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: percpu: avoid Wshadow warning
- From: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
- From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: fix ffs -Wshadow warning
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] qspinlock: use signed temporaries for cmpxchg
- From: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] qspinlock: use signed temporaries for cmpxchg
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] qspinlock: use signed temporaries for cmpxchg
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] asm-generic: fix ffs -Wshadow warning
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] asm-generic: fix ffs -Wshadow warning
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] asm-generic: percpu: avoid Wshadow warning
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 13/29] arm64/build: Assert for unwanted sections
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 5/5] kselftest: Extend vdso correctness test to clock_gettime64
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 1/5] kselftest: Enable vDSO test on non x86 platforms
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 4/5] kselftest: Move test_vdso to the vDSO test suite
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 2/5] kselftest: Extend vDSO selftest
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 3/5] kselftest: Extend vDSO selftest to clock_getres
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 0/5] kselftest: Extend vDSO tests
- From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 7/7] secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 6/7] mm: secretmem: use PMD-size pages to amortize direct map fragmentation
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 5/7] arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call were relevant
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 4/7] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 3/7] set_memory: allow set_direct_map_*_noflush() for multiple pages
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 2/7] mmap: make mlock_future_check() global
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 1/7] mm: add definition of PMD_PAGE_ORDER
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v7 0/7] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas
- From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: "'Greg KH'" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove __kernel_datapage_offset and simplify __get_datapage()
- From: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 0/4] Introduce the for_each_set_clump macro
- From: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove __kernel_datapage_offset and simplify __get_datapage()
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove __kernel_datapage_offset and simplify __get_datapage()
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v8 2/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove __kernel_datapage_offset and simplify __get_datapage()
- From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add API for dynamic thermal power management
- From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4] x86: add failure injection to get/put/clear_user
- From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4] x86: add failure injection to get/put/clear_user
- From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: Add support for asymmetric AArch32 EL0 configurations
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
- From: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
- From: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
- From: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] vmlinux.lds.h: Keep .ctors.* with .ctors
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] vmlinux.lds.h: Keep .ctors.* with .ctors
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] vmlinux.lds.h: Keep .ctors.* with .ctors
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Buggy commit tracked to: "Re: [PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: move rw_copy_check_uvector() into lib/iov_iter.c"
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] vmlinux.lds.h: Keep .ctors.* with .ctors
- From: Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] vmlinux.lds.h: Keep .ctors.* with .ctors
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] vmlinux.lds.h: Keep .ctors.* with .ctors
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] x86/asm: annotate indirect jumps
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: Add support for asymmetric AArch32 EL0 configurations
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Export id_aar64fpr0 via sysfs
- From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: Add support for asymmetric AArch32 EL0 configurations
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: Add support for asymmetric AArch32 EL0 configurations
- From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@xxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[IETF Annouce]
[Netdev]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]