On 11/24/20 15:50, Will Deacon wrote:
> Provide an implementation of arch_task_cpu_possible_mask() so that we
> can prevent 64-bit-only cores being added to the 'cpus_mask' for compat
> tasks on systems with mismatched 32-bit support at EL0,
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index 0672236e1aea..641dff35a56f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h
nit: wouldn't cpufeature.h be a better header? No strong opinion really, it
just looked weird to see this among memory management related code.
Cheers
--
Qais Yousef
> @@ -251,6 +251,19 @@ switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
> #define deactivate_mm(tsk,mm) do { } while (0)
> #define activate_mm(prev,next) switch_mm(prev, next, current)
>
> +static inline const struct cpumask *
> +arch_task_cpu_possible_mask(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&arm64_mismatched_32bit_el0))
> + return cpu_possible_mask;
> +
> + if (!is_compat_thread(task_thread_info(p)))
> + return cpu_possible_mask;
> +
> + return system_32bit_el0_cpumask();
> +}
> +#define arch_task_cpu_possible_mask arch_task_cpu_possible_mask
> +
> void verify_cpu_asid_bits(void);
> void post_ttbr_update_workaround(void);
>
> --
> 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
>
