On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:45:54AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I had it there originally, I guess I should have left it there ;-) > > When I changed it, I was considering to do the same for additional > syscalls that have very small differences now (timer_create, > rt_sigqueueinfo, rt_sigpending, recvmsg, sendmsg) and use > in_compat_syscall() there, but then I decided against that. > > In the end, I did like the split, as I found the smaller three > patches that contain the real change easier to review, and > it turns the larger patch at the end into a more obvious > transformation. Oh well, let's just keep the split as-is then.
