On 10/12/2020 04:11, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Erez, > > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: > Thanks for the robot, as we rarely use clang for kernel. It is very helpful. > [auto build test ERROR on b65054597872ce3aefbc6a666385eabdf9e288da] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Erez-Geva/Add-sending-TX-hardware-timestamp-for-TC-ETF-Qdisc/20201210-000521 I can not find this commit > base: b65054597872ce3aefbc6a666385eabdf9e288da > config: mips-randconfig-r026-20201209 (attached as .config) > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 1968804ac726e7674d5de22bc2204b45857da344) However the clang in https://download.01.org/0day-ci/cross-package/clang-latest/clang.tar.xz is version 11 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross Your make cross script tries to download the clang every time. Please separate the download (which is ~400 MB and 2 GB after open) from the compilation. Please use "wget" follow your own instructions in this email. > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > # install mips cross compiling tool for clang build > # apt-get install binutils-mips-linux-gnu > # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/8a8f634bc74db16dc551cfcf3b63c1183f98eaac > git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux > git fetch --no-tags linux-review Erez-Geva/Add-sending-TX-hardware-timestamp-for-TC-ETF-Qdisc/20201210-000521 This branch is absent > git checkout 8a8f634bc74db16dc551cfcf3b63c1183f98eaac This commit as well > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=mips > I use Debian 10.7. I usually compile with GCC. I have not see any errors. When I use clang 11 from download.01.org I get a crash right away. Please add a proper instructions how to use clang on Debian or provide a Docker container with updated clang for testing. > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >>> net/core/sock.c:2383:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'SCM_HW_TXTIME'; did you mean 'SOCK_HW_TXTIME'? > case SCM_HW_TXTIME: > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ > SOCK_HW_TXTIME > include/net/sock.h:862:2: note: 'SOCK_HW_TXTIME' declared here > SOCK_HW_TXTIME, > ^ > 1 error generated. > > vim +2383 net/core/sock.c > > 2351 > 2352 int __sock_cmsg_send(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, struct cmsghdr *cmsg, > 2353 struct sockcm_cookie *sockc) > 2354 { > 2355 u32 tsflags; > 2356 > 2357 switch (cmsg->cmsg_type) { > 2358 case SO_MARK: > 2359 if (!ns_capable(sock_net(sk)->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) > 2360 return -EPERM; > 2361 if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(u32))) > 2362 return -EINVAL; > 2363 sockc->mark = *(u32 *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg); > 2364 break; > 2365 case SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD: > 2366 if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(u32))) > 2367 return -EINVAL; > 2368 > 2369 tsflags = *(u32 *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg); > 2370 if (tsflags & ~SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_RECORD_MASK) > 2371 return -EINVAL; > 2372 > 2373 sockc->tsflags &= ~SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_RECORD_MASK; > 2374 sockc->tsflags |= tsflags; > 2375 break; > 2376 case SCM_TXTIME: > 2377 if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TXTIME)) > 2378 return -EINVAL; > 2379 if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(u64))) > 2380 return -EINVAL; > 2381 sockc->transmit_time = get_unaligned((u64 *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg)); > 2382 break; >> 2383 case SCM_HW_TXTIME: > 2384 if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_HW_TXTIME)) > 2385 return -EINVAL; > 2386 if (cmsg->cmsg_len != CMSG_LEN(sizeof(u64))) > 2387 return -EINVAL; > 2388 sockc->transmit_hw_time = get_unaligned((u64 *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg)); > 2389 break; > 2390 /* SCM_RIGHTS and SCM_CREDENTIALS are semantically in SOL_UNIX. */ > 2391 case SCM_RIGHTS: > 2392 case SCM_CREDENTIALS: > 2393 break; > 2394 default: > 2395 return -EINVAL; > 2396 } > 2397 return 0; > 2398 } > 2399 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sock_cmsg_send); > 2400 > > --- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Please improve the robot, so we can comply and properly support clang compilation. Thanks Erez
