Re: [PATCH v15 08/26] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_COW

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/8/2020 9:50 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 08:21:53AM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
There is essentially no room left in the x86 hardware PTEs on some OSes
(not Linux).  That left the hardware architects looking for a way to
represent a new memory type (shadow stack) within the existing bits.
They chose to repurpose a lightly-used state: Write=0,Dirty=1.

It is not clear to me what the definition and semantics of that bit is.

+#define _PAGE_BIT_COW          _PAGE_BIT_SOFTW5 /* copy-on-write */

Is it set by hw or by sw and hw uses it to know it is a shadow stack
page, and so on.

I think you should lead with its definition.

Ok.

...

Write=0,Dirty=1 PTEs.  In places where we do create them, we need to find
an alternative way to represent them _without_ using the same hardware bit
combination.  Thus, enter _PAGE_COW.  This results in the following:

(a) A modified, copy-on-write (COW) page: (R/O + _PAGE_COW)
(b) A R/O page that has been COW'ed: (R/O + _PAGE_COW)

Both are "R/O + _PAGE_COW". Where's the difference? The dirty bit?

The PTEs are the same for both (a) and (b), but come from different routes.

     The user page is in a R/O VMA, and get_user_pages() needs a writable
     copy.  The page fault handler creates a copy of the page and sets
     the new copy's PTE as R/O and _PAGE_COW.
(c) A shadow stack PTE: (R/O + _PAGE_DIRTY_HW)

So W=0, D=1 ?

Yes.

(d) A shared shadow stack PTE: (R/O + _PAGE_COW)
     When a shadow stack page is being shared among processes (this happens
     at fork()), its PTE is cleared of _PAGE_DIRTY_HW, so the next shadow
     stack access causes a fault, and the page is duplicated and
     _PAGE_DIRTY_HW is set again.  This is the COW equivalent for shadow
     stack pages, even though it's copy-on-access rather than copy-on-write.
(e) A page where the processor observed a Write=1 PTE, started a write, set
     Dirty=1, but then observed a Write=0 PTE.

How does that happen? Something changed the PTE's W bit to 0 in-between?

Yes.

...

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
index b23697658b28..c88c7ccf0318 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ extern pmdval_t early_pmd_flags;
   * The following only work if pte_present() is true.
   * Undefined behaviour if not..
   */
-static inline int pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
+static inline bool pte_dirty(pte_t pte)
  {
-	return pte_flags(pte) & _PAGE_DIRTY_HW;
+	return pte_flags(pte) & _PAGE_DIRTY_BITS;

Why?

Does _PAGE_COW mean dirty too?

Yes. Basically [read-only & dirty] is created by software. Now the software uses a different bit.

@@ -343,6 +349,17 @@ static inline pte_t pte_mkold(pte_t pte)
static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
  {
+	/*
+	 * Blindly clearing _PAGE_RW might accidentally create
+	 * a shadow stack PTE (RW=0,Dirty=1).  Move the hardware
+	 * dirty value to the software bit.
+	 */
+	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
+		pte.pte |= (pte.pte & _PAGE_DIRTY_HW) >>
+			   _PAGE_BIT_DIRTY_HW << _PAGE_BIT_COW;

Let that line stick out. And that shifting is not grokkable at a quick
glance, at least not to me. Simplify?

Ok.

  static inline pmd_t pmd_wrprotect(pmd_t pmd)
  {
+	/*
+	 * Blindly clearing _PAGE_RW might accidentally create
+	 * a shadow stack PMD (RW=0,Dirty=1).  Move the hardware
+	 * dirty value to the software bit.

This whole carefully sidestepping the possiblity of creating a shadow
stack pXd is kinda sucky...

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
index 7462a574fc93..5f764d8d9bae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_types.h
@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
  #define _PAGE_BIT_SOFTW2	10	/* " */
  #define _PAGE_BIT_SOFTW3	11	/* " */
  #define _PAGE_BIT_PAT_LARGE	12	/* On 2MB or 1GB pages */
-#define _PAGE_BIT_SOFTW4	58	/* available for programmer */
+#define _PAGE_BIT_SOFTW4	57	/* available for programmer */
+#define _PAGE_BIT_SOFTW5	58	/* available for programmer */
  #define _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT0	59	/* Protection Keys, bit 1/4 */
  #define _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT1	60	/* Protection Keys, bit 2/4 */
  #define _PAGE_BIT_PKEY_BIT2	61	/* Protection Keys, bit 3/4 */
@@ -36,6 +37,16 @@
  #define _PAGE_BIT_SOFT_DIRTY	_PAGE_BIT_SOFTW3 /* software dirty tracking */
  #define _PAGE_BIT_DEVMAP	_PAGE_BIT_SOFTW4
+/*
+ * This bit indicates a copy-on-write page, and is different from
+ * _PAGE_BIT_SOFT_DIRTY, which tracks which pages a task writes to.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64

CONFIG_X86_64 ? Do all x86 machines out there support CET?

If anything, CONFIG_X86_CET...

Ok.

--
Yu-cheng



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux