Re: [PATCH v14 10/10] secretmem: test: add basic selftest for memfd_secret(2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/2/20 10:29 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...
+#include "../kselftest.h"
+
+#define fail(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_fail(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define pass(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_pass(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define skip(fmt, ...) ksft_test_result_skip(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
+#ifdef __NR_memfd_secret
+
+#include <linux/secretmem.h>

Hi Mike,

Say, when I tried this out from today's linux-next, I had to delete the
above line. In other words, the following was required in order to build:

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
index 79578dfd13e6..c878c2b841fc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/memfd_secret.c
@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@

 #ifdef __NR_memfd_secret

-#include <linux/secretmem.h>
-
 #define PATTERN        0x55

 static const int prot = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;


...and that makes sense to me, because:

a) secretmem.h is not in the uapi, which this selftests/vm build system
   expects (it runs "make headers_install" for us, which is *not* going
   to pick up items in the kernel include dirs), and

b) There is nothing in secretmem.h that this test uses, anyway! Just these:

bool vma_is_secretmem(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
bool page_is_secretmem(struct page *page);
bool secretmem_active(void);


...or am I just Doing It Wrong? :)

thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux