Linux Next
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 9
- From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 9
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 9
- From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jul 9
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the rd-docs tree with the trivial tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 7
- From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: linux-next: Tree for Jul 7
- From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
- From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/6] DRBG: Rebasing unapplied patches
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the iommu tree
- From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jul 8
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the iommu tree
- From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with the arm tree
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jul 7
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the renesas tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: Nick Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] DRBG: Rebasing unapplied patches
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] DRBG: cleanup of preprocessor macros
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] DRBG: Call CTR DRBG DF function only once
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] DRBG: Select correct DRBG core for stdrng
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] DRBG: Mix a time stamp into DRBG state
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] DRBG: HMAC-SHA1 DRBG has crypto strength of 128 bits
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] DRBG: cleanup of preprocessor macros
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] DRBG: cleanup of preprocessor macros
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] DRBG: use of kernel linked list
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jul 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb-gadget tree with the usb.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 3 (staging/unisys)
- From: Ken Cox <jkc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 3 (staging/unisys)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jul 3
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded (stack protector)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded (stack protector)
- From: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] kbuild: explain stack-protector-strong CONFIG logic
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded (stack protector)
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded (stack protector)
- From: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded (stack protector)
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded (stack protector)
- From: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded (stack protector)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded (stack protector)
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded (stack protector)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-07-02-15-07 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-perf tree with the arm tree
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jul 2
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-perf tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jul 1
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Indicate with immediate interest
- From: "Mr. Ali Saeed" <info@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140630, in drivers/staging/unisys/channels/chanstub.c
- From: Ken Cox <jkc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 30
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] DRBG: cleanup of preprocessor macros
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] DRBG: cleanup of preprocessor macros
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] DRBG: cleanup of preprocessor macros
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] DRBG: cleanup of preprocessor macros
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] DRBG: use of kernel linked list
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] DRBG: cleanup of preprocessor macros
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] DRBG: Fix format string for debugging statements
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] DRBG: Call CTR DRBG DF function only once
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] DRBG: Fixes for sparse tool reports
- From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] staging: emxx_udc: replace strict_strtol call
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] staging: emxx_udc: replace strict_strtol call
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mfd: sec-core requires regulators
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mfd: sec-core requires regulators
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 27
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: James Morris <james.l.morris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: bad commits in the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (crypto/qat)
- From: "Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (crypto/drbg)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (crypto/qat)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (crypto/qat)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Petr Mládek <pmladek@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 26
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] enic: Make dummy rfs functions inline to fix !CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL build
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-06-25-16-44 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: James Morris <james.l.morris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] enic: Make dummy rfs functions inline to fix !CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL build
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 25
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] irq_work: Implement remote queueing
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mfd: sec-core requires regulators
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140624, in drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140624, in drivers/mfd/sec-core.c
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)
- From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 24
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto tree
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto tree
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with Linus' tree
- From: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 23
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the char-misc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the crypto tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mvebu tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] ARM: shmobile: rcar-gen2: update call to dma_contiguous_reserve_area
- From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: randconfig build error with next-20140604, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debugfs.c
- From: "Kondratiev, Vladimir" <vkondrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140620, in drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [-next] comedi I/O accessor name clashes
- From: Hartley Sweeten <HartleyS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20140620, in drivers/thunderbolt/nhi.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- since-3.15 branch opened for mm git tree (was: Re: mmotm 2014-06-19-16-33 uploaded)
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next] comedi I/O accessor name clashes
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next] comedi I/O accessor name clashes
- From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] ARM: shmobile: rcar-gen2: update call to dma_contiguous_reserve_area
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [-next] comedi I/O accessor name clashes
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] staging: r8192ee: Adapt flush function prototype
- From: Vincent <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 20
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] staging: r8192ee: Adapt flush function prototype
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-06-19-16-33 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (vhost_scsi)
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] staging: vt6655: coding style: use C89 comments
- From: eudyptula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (drm/i915)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (vhost_scsi)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] ARM: shmobile: rcar-gen2: update call to dma_contiguous_reserve_area
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Build error - vmlinux.lds [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18]
- From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Build error - vmlinux.lds [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18]
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Build error - vmlinux.lds [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18]
- From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Build error - vmlinux.lds [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18]
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Build error - vmlinux.lds [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18]
- From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 18
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: the logfs tree needs some work or merging
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the cgroup tree has an unnecessary merge
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: the vfs tree needs cleaning up
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the cgroup tree has an unnecessary merge
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: the cgroup tree has an unnecessary merge
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: the cgroup tree has an unnecessary merge
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: the selinux tree needs cleaning up
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: stats (Re: Linux 3.16-rc1 - merge window closed)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 17
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the nfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the imx-mxs tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: Tom Herbert <therbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: time to start cleaning up
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: time to start cleaning up
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: Tom Herbert <therbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 13
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: time to start cleaning up
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: Tom Herbert <therbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-06-12-16-38 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [-next] Regression: ssh log in slowdown
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 12
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next] ASoC fsl-ssi change breaks mpc85xx_defconfig build
- From: Markus Pargmann <mpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with the virtio tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the virtio tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [next] ASoC fsl-ssi change breaks mpc85xx_defconfig build
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers: Kconfig: Add HAS_IOMEM dependency for allmodconfig under score architecture
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 11
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers: Kconfig: Add HAS_IOMEM dependency for allmodconfig under score architecture
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] drivers: Kconfig: Add HAS_IOMEM dependency for allmodconfig under score architecture
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vhost tree
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 10
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the vhost tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the f2fs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140604, in drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vhost tree
- From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140604, in drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca954x.c
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] staging: r8192ee: Adapt flush function prototype
- From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] staging: r8192ee: Adapt flush function prototype
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] amd-xgbe: Remove unnecessary include
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-integrity
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] amd-xgbe: Remove unnecessary include
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-integrity
- From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-integrity
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 6
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-integrity
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-integrity
- From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-integrity
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-integrity
- From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (mmc/host/usdhi6ro10.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] i2c: pca954x: Fix compilation without CONFIG_GPIOLIB
- From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 5
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the btrfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kisskb not updated?
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree
- From: KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kisskb not updated?
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
- From: Chris Ball <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] i2c: pca954x: Fix compilation without CONFIG_GPIOLIB
- From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] i2c: pca954x: Fix compilation without CONFIG_GPIOLIB
- From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
- From: Chris Ball <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] i2c: pca954x: Fix compilation without CONFIG_GPIOLIB
- From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: bad commits in the nfs tree
- From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 4
- From: Steve Capper <steve.capper@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 4
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kisskb not updated?
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- kisskb not updated?
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the mmc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the mmc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the ftrace tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: failed to fetch the aio tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: failed to fetch the aio tree
- From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: failed to fetch the aio tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: bad commits in the nfs tree
- From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: bad commits in the nfs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 3
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the vhost tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
- From: Chris Ball <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: of_mdio: use int type for address variable
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: of_mdio: export symbol of_mdiobus_link_phydev
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] of: of_mdio: export symbol of_mdiobus_link_phydev
- From: Daniel Mack <zonque@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] net: of_mdio: use int type for address variable
- From: Daniel Mack <zonque@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 2
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jun 2
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nommu build failures on ARM in linux-next
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the infiniband tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86,vdso: Fix cross-compilation from big-endian architectures
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86,vdso: Fix cross-compilation from big-endian architectures
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86,vdso: Fix cross-compilation from big-endian architectures
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86,vdso: Fix cross-compilation from big-endian architectures
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86,vdso: Fix cross-compilation from big-endian architectures
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] x86,vdso: Fix cross-compilation from big-endian architectures
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] x86,vdso: When vdso2c fails, unlink the output
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] x86,vdso: vdso build fixes and improvements
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86,vdso: vdso build fixes and improvements
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nommu build failures on ARM in linux-next
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nommu build failures on ARM in linux-next
- From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 30
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86,vdso: vdso build fixes and improvements
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the omap_dss2 tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nommu build failures on ARM in linux-next
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nommu build failures on ARM in linux-next
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86,vdso: vdso build fixes and improvements
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86,vdso: vdso build fixes and improvements
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] x86,vdso: When vdso2c fails, unlink the output
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] x86,vdso: Fix cross-compilation from big-endian architectures
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] x86,vdso: vdso build fixes and improvements
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build failure on m68k in nfs code
- From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:x86/vdso] x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so preparation in build-time C
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:x86/vdso] x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so preparation in build-time C
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:x86/vdso] x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so preparation in build-time C
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next build failure on m68k in nfs code
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:x86/vdso] x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so preparation in build-time C
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [tip:x86/vdso] x86, vdso: Reimplement vdso.so preparation in build-time C
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: nommu build failures on ARM in linux-next
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- nommu build failures on ARM in linux-next
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
- From: Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 29
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the iommu tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with Linus' tree
- From: Michael Stickel <ms@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with Linus' tree
- From: Michael Welling <mwelling@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 28
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 回复: Re: 回复: Re: [Consult] About only one Signed-of-by for the patches
- From: Xuetao Guan <gxt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request inclusion of HYP mode cpu_resume fix into linux-next
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 回复: Re: [Consult] About only one Signed-of-by for the patches
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140527, in drivers/staging/rtl8192ee
- From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the tree
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the m68k tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] imx-drm: imx-tve: remove unused variable
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] DRM: Armada: update dma_buf_export use
- From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request inclusion of HYP mode cpu_resume fix into linux-next
- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 27
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the m68k tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] DRM: Armada: update dma_buf_export use
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] DRM: Armada: update dma_buf_export use
- From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 回复: Re: [Consult] About only one Signed-of-by for the patches
- From: Xuetao Guan <gxt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix build error in mxt_read_t9_resolution
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the ext4 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Consult] About only one Signed-of-by for the patches
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Consult] About only one Signed-of-by for the patches
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Consult] About only one Signed-of-by for the patches
- From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [-next] Imminent merge conflict in Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (staging/rtl8192ee)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree
- From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 26 (syscalls is85/ia32 on x86_64)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc tree with the slave-dma tree
- From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 26
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with the scsi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clockevents tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the devicetree tree
- From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the clockevents tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: "Li.Xiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Li.Xiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the clockevents tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the clockevents tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the devicetree tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] imx-drm: imx-tve: remove unused variable
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] DRM: Armada: update dma_buf_export use
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] DRM: Armada: update dma_buf_export use
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] imx-drm: imx-tve: remove unused variable
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] imx-drm: imx-tve: remove unused variable
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] DRM: Armada: update dma_buf_export use
- From: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] DRM: Armada: update dma_buf_export use
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140523, in net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21
- From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20140523, in net/bridge/br_netfilter.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the target-updates tree
- From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140523, in arch/x86/pci/fixup.c
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 23
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the target-updates tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the target-updates tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] sound branch of STMPE cleanups
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL v2] mfd/gpio: New pull request with irq_base removed
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
- From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the leds tree
- From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] sound branch of STMPE cleanups
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: removing never #def'd BP_PROC_SUPPORT
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the leds tree
- From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm64 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mmc tree with the slave-dma tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] sound branch of STMPE cleanups
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf: delete unused variable tmp to fix new build warning
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140522, in drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c
- From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] perf: delete unused variable tmp to fix new build warning
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 22
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21
- From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the leds tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
- From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the renesas tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-05-21-16-57 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [ath9k-devel] randconfig build error with next-20140519, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c
- From: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ath9k-devel] randconfig build error with next-20140519, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c
- From: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ath9k-devel] randconfig build error with next-20140519, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c
- From: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20140521, in sound/soc/codecs/alc5623.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ath9k-devel] randconfig build error with next-20140519, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c
- From: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ath9k-devel] randconfig build error with next-20140519, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c
- From: Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 21
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140520, in drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
- From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix build error in mxt_read_t9_resolution
- From: nick.dyer@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the dma-buf tree
- From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 20
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the dma-buf tree
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with the drm-intel tree
- From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with the staging tree
- From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd-lj tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warnings after merge of the input tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the dma-buf tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with the staging tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with the staging tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with the drm-intel tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the sparc-next tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: failed to fetch the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the pinctrl tree
- From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the pinctrl tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the samsung tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-05-16-16-56 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [linux-next / akpm] Heads up on minor conflicts in mm/memcontrol.c
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140516, in drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_cmd.c
- From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (tty/serial/men_z135_uart.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140515, in drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/eq.c
- From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 15
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the fsl tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the renesas tree
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (tty/serial/men_z135_uart.c)
- From: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the renesas tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 14 (tty/serial/men_z135_uart.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 14
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree number_of_cpusets -fix
- From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the cgroup tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: new branch for linux-next (irqchip)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-05-13-16-34 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: mmotm 2014-05-09-16-17 uploaded (ptrace-ab.hi vs. net/core/filter.c)
- From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] net: fix test_bpf build to depend on NET
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-05-09-16-17 uploaded (ptrace-ab.hi vs. net/core/filter.c)
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] net: fix test_bpf build to depend on NET
- From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] net: fix test_bpf build to depend on NET
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140513, in drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20140513, in drivers/usb/phy/phy-msm-usb.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the cifs tree
- From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: don't use temporary variable in __compiletime_assert()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: don't use temporary variable in __compiletime_assert()
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 13
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 13
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: don't use temporary variable in __compiletime_assert()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the ipsec tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the ipsec tree
- From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the ipsec tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the cifs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the fixes tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140512, in mm/slub.c
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140512, in mm/slub.c
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: don't use temporary variable in __compiletime_assert()
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140512, in mm/slub.c
- From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140512, in mm/slub.c
- From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxx>
- Re: randconfig build error with next-20140512, in mm/slub.c
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- randconfig build error with next-20140512, in mm/slub.c
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build failure
- From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build failure
- From: Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: don't use temporary variable in __compiletime_assert()
- From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: don't use temporary variable in __compiletime_assert()
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] compiler.h: don't use temporary variable in __compiletime_assert()
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next build failure
- From: Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] perf: remove unused variable
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 12
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the fsl tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: add scottwood/linux.git
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: add scottwood/linux.git
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] perf: remove unused variable
- From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2014-05-09-16-17 uploaded (ptrace-ab.hi vs. net/core/filter.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2014-05-09-16-17 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- linux-next: add scottwood/linux.git
- From: Scott Wood <scottwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with Linus' tree
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 9
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc tree with Linus' tree
- From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mmc tree with Linus' tree
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the mmc tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the crypto-current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (regulator/arizona-ldo1.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next] ARM: mvebu: Fix pmsu compilation when ARMv6 is selected
- From: Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Regression: make clean (was linux-next: Tree for May 8:)
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 8
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: randconfig build error with next-20140502, in drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc_drv.c
- From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for May 7 (argh)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for May 7
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: kprobes broken in linux-next (was Re: [tip:perf/kprobes] kprobes: Introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro to maintain kprobes blacklist)
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Samba]
[Yosemite News]