* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got conflicts in
> fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdev.c and
> fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayoutdm.c between commit 871760ce97a9
> ("pnfs/blocklayout: move all rpc_pipefs related code into a single
> file") from the nfs tree and commit f139caf2e897 ("sched, cleanup,
> treewide: Remove set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING) after schedule()")
> from the tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former move the code in these two files into
> fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c, so I deleted the 2 files and applied
> the following merge fix patch) and can carry the fix as necessary (no
> action is required).
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:29:19 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] pnfs: merge fixup for sched cleanup of set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING)
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
> index 8d04bda2bd2e..e966c023b1b7 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/rpc_pipefs.c
> @@ -92,7 +92,6 @@ bl_resolve_deviceid(struct nfs_server *server, struct pnfs_block_volume *b,
>
> set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> schedule();
> - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> remove_wait_queue(&nn->bl_wq, &wq);
>
> if (reply->status != BL_DEVICE_REQUEST_PROC) {
Looks good, thanks Stephen!
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
