Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the tip tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 07:38:26PM -0400, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 05:07:35PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> >> lib/Kconfig.debug between commit e704f93af5a0 ("kernel: time: Add
> >> udelay_test module to validate udelay") from the tip tree and commit
> >> 0a8adf584759 ("test: add firmware_class loader test") from the
> >> driver-core tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> >> is required).
> >
> > Looks good, thanks.
> 
> For keeping things regularized, could this module instead be named
> "test_udelay", to match the rest of most of the test modules?
> (Starting with "test_".)

Makes sense, want to send a patch to rename it?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux