Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
fs/ext4/super.c between commit eb68d0e2fc5a ("ext4: track extent status
tree shrinker delay statictics") from the ext4 tree and commit
908c7f1949cb ("percpu_counter: add @gfp to percpu_counter_init()") from
the percpu tree.
I fixed it up (the former removed a reference to percpu_counter_init)
and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
That commit also added two references in fs/ext4/extents_status.c (thus
proving that modifying a little used API causes it to be used
more :-)), so I added the following merge fix patch:
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 16:25:46 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] percpu_counter: fix for ext4 updates
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 09fd57667262..3777f7eda5cf 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/list_sort.h>
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include "ext4.h"
#include "extents_status.h"
@@ -1189,10 +1190,10 @@ int ext4_es_register_shrinker(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_cache_misses = 0;
sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_scan_time = 0;
sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_max_scan_time = 0;
- err = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_all_cnt, 0);
+ err = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_all_cnt, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (err)
return err;
- err = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_lru_cnt, 0);
+ err = percpu_counter_init(&sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_lru_cnt, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (err)
goto err1;
--
2.1.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
