On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 07:31:14AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > Tejun, Christoph, > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:11:23AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:00:07AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > Subject: irqchip: Properly fetch the per cpu offset > > > > > > The raw_cpu_read() conversion dropped the fetch of the offset > > > from base->percpu_base in gic_get_percpu_base. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Index: linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux.orig/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c > > > +++ linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c > > > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX > > > #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED > > > static void __iomem *gic_get_percpu_base(union gic_base *base) > > > { > > > - return raw_cpu_read(base->percpu_base); > > > + return raw_cpu_read(*base->percpu_base); > > > > I suppose this should go through percpu/for-3.18-consistent-ops? Can > > we please cc irq folks and get acks? > > Could Thomas and I get a pointer to the original patch and thread that > caused the error? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1769201/focus=1769204 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.next/32601/focus=32606 Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html