Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun, Christoph,

On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 02:11:23AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:00:07AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Subject: irqchip: Properly fetch the per cpu offset
> > 
> > The raw_cpu_read() conversion dropped the fetch of the offset
> > from base->percpu_base in gic_get_percpu_base.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Index: linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> > +++ linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ static struct gic_chip_data gic_data[MAX
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
> >  static void __iomem *gic_get_percpu_base(union gic_base *base)
> >  {
> > -	return raw_cpu_read(base->percpu_base);
> > +	return raw_cpu_read(*base->percpu_base);
> 
> I suppose this should go through percpu/for-3.18-consistent-ops?  Can
> we please cc irq folks and get acks?

Could Thomas and I get a pointer to the original patch and thread that
caused the error?

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux