Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Günter,

On 09/20/2014 11:01 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 09/20/2014 12:36 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
Hi Günter,

On 09/19/2014 09:15 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 04:58:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Changes since 20140917:

The fsl tree still had its build failure so I used the version from
next-20140917.

The v4l-dvb tree lost its build failure.

The security tree gained a conflict against the file-locks tree.

Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 6014
  5488 files changed, 217522 insertions(+), 129375 deletions(-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


parisc:defconfig, parisc:generic-32bit_defconfig:

--------------
Error log:
arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c: In function 'do_syscall_trace_enter':
arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.c:274:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'secure_computing' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [arch/parisc/kernel/ptrace.o] Error 1

Bisect points to commit 273299fb6380 ('Merge branch 'x86/seccomp') which
obviously doesn't help much. Suspected culprit is c90f06943e05 ('parisc: Wire up
seccomp, getrandom and memfd_create syscalls') which seems to be missing an
include file.

I've added this patch to my for-next tree:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=0f18557b017b3469e1f8edf5cf34c1cba856fdbe

That doesn't solve the problem for me, most likely because
HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER is not set for parisc in next-20140919.
This is what seccomp.h does with it:

#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
static inline int secure_computing(void) { return 0; }
#else
static inline void secure_computing_strict(int this_syscall) { return; }
#endif

You don't have this flag in your tree. It was introduced in -next with
commit 'seccomp,x86,arm,mips,s390: Remove nr parameter from secure_computing'.

Thanks for the hint!
Since parisc currently only supports the strict mode, I've changed the code
to call secure_computing_strict() instead of secure_computing() with this commit in my for-next tree:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=fe5c873459a973e59854bd235a7e6b3eaa8e5fe0

It now builds cleanly with the next-20140919 tree.

Thanks!
Helge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux