Linux Arch
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [PATCH v3 3/5] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, make WARN call no_printk to check format and args
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 2/5] include/asm-generic/bug.h: Style fix: s/while(0)/while (0)/
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 1/5] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [for-next][PATCH 17/20] ftrace: Do not pass data to ftrace_dyn_arch_init
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [for-next][PATCH 16/20] ftrace: Pass retval through return in ftrace_dyn_arch_init()
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/52] powerpc, sysfs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 14/52] powerpc, sysfs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Making a universal list of syscalls?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Making a universal list of syscalls?
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Making a universal list of syscalls?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6][RFC] syscall: define syscall_get_arch() for each audit-supported arch
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] arch: Remove stub cputime.h headers
- From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] arch: Remove stub cputime.h headers
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] cputime: Fixes and cleanups on steal time accounting
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC 00/16] compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 14/16] kexec/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE with changing parameter types
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 16/16] s390/compat: build error for large compat syscall args
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 15/16] mm/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE with changing parameter types
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 12/16] ipc/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE with changing parameter types
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 13/16] net/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE with changing parameter types
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 10/16] ipc/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 11/16] fs/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE with changing parameter types
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 08/16] security/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 09/16] fs/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 06/16] net/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 03/16] ipc/compat_sys_msgrcv: change msgtyp type from long to compat_long_t
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 05/16] kernel/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 07/16] mm/compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 02/16] compat: add COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE0 macro
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 04/16] fs/compat: optional preadv64/pwrite64 compat system calls
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 01/16] compat: let architectures define __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_GETDENTS64
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH/RFC 00/16] compat: convert to COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6][RFC] syscall: define syscall_get_arch() for each audit-supported arch
- From: Markos Chandras <Markos.Chandras@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Making a universal list of syscalls?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Making a universal list of syscalls?
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6][RFC] syscall: define syscall_get_arch() for each audit-supported arch
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6][RFC] syscall: define syscall_get_arch() for each audit-supported arch
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6][RFC] audit: add arch field to seccomp event log
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6][RFC] audit: __audit_syscall_entry: ignore arch arg and call syscall_get_arch() directly
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6][RFC] audit: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6][RFC] audit: drop arch from audit_syscall_entry() interface
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6][RFC] audit: drop args from syscall_get_arch() interface
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6][RFC] audit: standardize and simplify syscall_get_arch()
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Making a universal list of syscalls?
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 28/44] Add translate_signal() helper
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 28/44] Add translate_signal() helper
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH] Remove CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Making a universal list of syscalls?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 28/44] Add translate_signal() helper
- From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [wireless-next:master 169/199] drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c:2469:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'atomic_set_mask'
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 12/44] metag: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/44] arc: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/44] arc: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: add sched_setattr/sched_getattr syscalls
- From: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 29/44] arc: Use translate_signal()
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/44] arm64: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/44] arc: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/44] avr32: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/44] blackfin: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/44] c6x: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/44] cris: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/44] frv: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/44] hexagon: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/44] ia64: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/44] m32r: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/44] m68k: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/44] metag: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/44] mn10300: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/44] mips: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 16/44] parisc: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/44] powerpc: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 19/44] score: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 23/44] unicore32: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 24/44] xtensa: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 25/44] Rip out get_signal_to_deliver()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 26/44] tracehook_signal_handler: Remove sig, info, ka and regs
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 27/44] Clean up signal_delivered()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 28/44] Add translate_signal() helper
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 29/44] arc: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 30/44] arm: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 31/44] arm64: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 32/44] blackfin: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 33/44] frv: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 34/44] m32r: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 35/44] m68k: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 35/44] m68k: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 37/44] mn10300: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 38/44] s390: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 40/44] tile: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 39/44] sh: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 42/44] x86: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 41/44] unicore32: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 43/44] um/x86: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 44/44] xtensa: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 36/44] microblaze: Use translate_signal()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 18/44] s390: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 20/44] sh: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 21/44] tile: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 22/44] um: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/44] microblaze: Use get_signal() signal_setup_done()
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- Global signal cleanup, take 2
- From: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: futex_init() vs. KERNEL_DS, was Re: Boot crash on 68030
- From: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] bug: Make BUG() call unreachable()
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: futex_init() vs. KERNEL_DS, was Re: Boot crash on 68030
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- futex_init() vs. KERNEL_DS, was Re: Boot crash on 68030
- From: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] bug: Make BUG() call unreachable()
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [libseccomp-discuss] Making a universal list of syscalls?
- From: Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [libseccomp-discuss] Making a universal list of syscalls?
- From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Making a universal list of syscalls?
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] bug: Make BUG() call unreachable()
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] bug: Make BUG() call unreachable()
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] bug: Make BUG() call unreachable()
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] bug: Use a common definition of BUG_ON regardless of CONFIG_BUG
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, make WARN call no_printk to check format and args
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] include/asm-generic/bug.h: Style fix: s/while(0)/while (0)/
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND 03/14] arm64: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/5] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/5] include/asm-generic/bug.h: Style fix: s/while(0)/while (0)/
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/5] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, make WARN call no_printk to check format and args
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/5] bug: Make BUG() call unreachable()
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/5] bug: Use a common definition of BUG_ON regardless of CONFIG_BUG
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "George Spelvin" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 40/73] watchdog: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>
- From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Michael Matz <matz@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] dma-buf: use reservation objects
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v5
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] reservation: add support for fences to enable cross-device synchronisation
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] dma-buf: add poll support, v3
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v5)
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] fence: dma-buf cross-device synchronization (v17)
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] dma-buf synchronization patches (updated)
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Michael Matz <matz@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: add sched_setattr/sched_getattr syscalls
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND] bug: When !CONFIG_BUG, simplify WARN_ON_ONCE and family
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- [BUG] Build error due -fstack-protector-strong not supported by compiler
- From: Juan Emilio Ledesma Torres <jueleto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ARCH question] Do syscall_get_nr and syscall_get_arguments always work?
- From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Michael Matz <matz@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RESEND 14/14] x86: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 07/14] m32r: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 04/14] blackfin: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 06/14] ia64: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 10/14] hppa: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 14/14] x86: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 09/14] mips: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 12/14] sh: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 08/14] metag: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 13/14] sparc: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 11/14] s390: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 05/14] cris: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 00/14] spinlock: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 03/14] arm64: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 02/14] ARM: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RESEND 01/14] ARC: locks: remove redundant arch_*_relax operations
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] Sparc: sparc_cpu_model isn't in asm/system.h any more [ver #2]
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] Sparc: sparc_cpu_model isn't in asm/system.h any more [ver #2]
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] Sparc: sparc_cpu_model isn't in asm/system.h any more
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/52] CPU hotplug: Provide lockless versions of callback registration functions
- From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ARCH question] Do syscall_get_nr and syscall_get_arguments always work?
- From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: David Lang <david@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] dma-buf: use reservation objects
- From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4
- From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ARCH question] Do syscall_get_nr and syscall_get_arguments always work?
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] generic CPU feature based udev module autoprobing
- From: "gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [ARCH question] Do syscall_get_nr and syscall_get_arguments always work?
- From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Mark Batty <Mark.Batty@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Sewell <Peter.Sewell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 00/52] CPU hotplug: Fix issues with callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Alec Teal <a.teal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 2/3] qspinlock, x86: Enable x86-64 to use queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 1/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 3/3] qspinlock, x86: Add x86 specific optimization for 2 contending tasks
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: add sched_setattr/sched_getattr syscalls
- From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)
- From: Christian König <deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)
- From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)
- From: Christian König <deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)
- From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)
- From: Christian König <deathsimple@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] fence: dma-buf cross-device synchronization (v17)
- From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/6] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)
- From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] reservation: add support for fences to enable cross-device synchronisation
- From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] dma-buf: use reservation objects
- From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] dma-buf: add poll support, v2
- From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] dma-buf: add poll support, v2
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] reservation: add support for fences to enable cross-device synchronisation
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] android: convert sync to fence api, v4
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] dma-buf: use reservation objects
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] seqno-fence: Hardware dma-buf implementation of fencing (v4)
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] fence: dma-buf cross-device synchronization (v17)
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] dma-buf synchronization patches
- From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [UPDATED][PATCH v2 46/52] xen, balloon: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/52] CPU hotplug: Provide lockless versions of callback registration functions
- From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] generic CPU feature based udev module autoprobing
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] generic CPU feature based udev module autoprobing
- From: "gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] generic CPU feature based udev module autoprobing
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 38/52] drivers/base/topology.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 19/73] arm: mach-s3c64xx mach-crag6410-module.c is not modular
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [UPDATED][PATCH v2 46/52] xen, balloon: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 52/52] net/iucv/iucv.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 51/52] net/core/flow.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 13/52] sparc, sysfs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 27/52] x86, pci, amd-bus: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 27/52] x86, pci, amd-bus: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 46/52] xen, balloon: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 46/52] xen, balloon: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 49/52] mm, vmstat: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 10/52] arm, kvm: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 29/52] x86, kvm: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/52] ia64, palinfo: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/52] arm, hw-breakpoint: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/52] CPU hotplug, perf: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/52] arm, kvm: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/52] s390, cacheinfo: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 14/52] powerpc, sysfs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 15/52] x86, msr: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 16/52] x86, cpuid: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 19/52] x86, mce: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 20/52] x86, therm_throt.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 24/52] x86, intel, rapl: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 25/52] x86, amd, uncore: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 28/52] x86, oprofile, nmi: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 27/52] x86, pci, amd-bus: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 29/52] x86, kvm: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 30/52] arm64, hw_breakpoint.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 31/52] arm64, debug-monitors: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 32/52] powercap, intel-rapl: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 33/52] scsi, bnx2i: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 34/52] scsi, bnx2fc: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 36/52] zsmalloc: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 37/52] acpi-cpufreq: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 40/52] intel-idle: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 41/52] oprofile, nmi-timer: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 42/52] octeon, watchdog: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 43/52] thermal, x86-pkg-temp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 44/52] hwmon, coretemp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 45/52] hwmon, via-cputemp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 46/52] xen, balloon: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 47/52] trace, ring-buffer: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 48/52] profile: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 49/52] mm, vmstat: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 50/52] mm, zswap: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 52/52] net/iucv/iucv.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 51/52] net/core/flow.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 39/52] clocksource, dummy-timer: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 38/52] drivers/base/topology.c: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 35/52] scsi, fcoe: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 26/52] x86, hpet: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 23/52] x86, intel, cacheinfo: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 22/52] x86, amd, ibs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 21/52] x86, therm_throt.c: Remove unused therm_cpu_lock
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 17/52] x86, vsyscall: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 18/52] x86, intel, uncore: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 12/52] s390, smp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 13/52] sparc, sysfs: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/52] ia64, err-inject: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/52] ia64, topology: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/52] ia64, salinfo: Fix hotplug callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/52] Doc/cpu-hotplug: Specify race-free way to register CPU hotplug callbacks
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/52] CPU hotplug: Provide lockless versions of callback registration functions
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/52] CPU hotplug: Add lockdep annotations to get/put_online_cpus()
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/52] CPU hotplug: Fix issues with callback registration
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 48/73] drivers/ata: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: Delete asm/system.h
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] ARM: Delete asm/system.h
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] Clean asm/system.h from docs
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] Sparc: sparc_cpu_model isn't in asm/system.h any more
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] UM: arch_align_stack() moved to asm/exec.h
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] Final asm/system.h cleanups
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] jump label: constify lookup functions
- From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 58/73] drivers/mfd: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>
- From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -tip v6 00/22] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(), cleanup and fixes crash bugs
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -tip v6 00/22] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(), cleanup and fixes crash bugs
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -tip v6 00/22] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(), cleanup and fixes crash bugs
- From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -tip v6 00/22] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(), cleanup and fixes crash bugs
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] cpu: add generic support for CPU feature based module autoloading
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: align x86 arch with generic CPU modalias handling
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/2] generic CPU feature based udev module autoprobing
- From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/73] init: delete the __cpuinit related stubs
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 72/73] drivers: delete remaining non-required instances of <linux/init.h>
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ARCH question] Do syscall_get_nr and syscall_get_arguments always work?
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [ARCH question] Do syscall_get_nr and syscall_get_arguments always work?
- From: Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] arch: s/smp_mb__(before|after)_(atomic|clear)_(dec,inc,bit)/smp_mb__\1/g
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include <linux/init.h>
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 54/73] drivers/leds: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>
- From: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 54/73] drivers/leds: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 54/73] drivers/leds: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>
- From: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramrad01@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] arch: Sanitize atomic_t bitwise ops
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] arch: Sanitize atomic_t bitwise ops
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] arch: Sanitize atomic_t bitwise ops
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] arch: Generic atomic.h cleanup
- From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] arch: Sanitize atomic_t bitwise ops
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] arch: Sanitize atomic_t bitwise ops
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] arch: Sanitize atomic_t bitwise ops
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 2/5] arc,hexagon: Delete asm/barrier.h
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 1/5] ia64: Fix up smp_mb__{before,after}_clear_bit
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 5/5] arch: Sanitize atomic_t bitwise ops
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mips octeon memory model questions
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 59/73] drivers/gpio: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 0/4] Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation
- From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 59/73] drivers/gpio: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include <linux/init.h>
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 59/73] drivers/gpio: delete non-required instances of include <linux/init.h>
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include <linux/init.h>
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include <linux/init.h>
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include <linux/init.h>
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [ARCH question] Do syscall_get_nr and syscall_get_arguments always work?
- From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] tree-wide: clean up no longer required #include <linux/init.h>
- From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mips octeon memory model questions
- From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mips octeon memory model questions
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mips octeon memory model questions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mips octeon memory model questions
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mips octeon memory model questions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mips octeon memory model questions
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ia64: Fix atomic ops vs memory barriers
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ia64: Fix atomic ops vs memory barriers
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] ia64: Fix atomic ops vs memory barriers
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH] ia64: Fix atomic ops vs memory barriers
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] asm-generic: add sched_setattr/sched_getattr syscalls
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v11 0/4] Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[IETF Annouce]
[Netdev]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]