At Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:46:58 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 January 2015 13:23:57 Yoshinori Sato wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > create mode 100644 arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild > > create mode 100644 arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/auxvec.h > > create mode 100644 arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h > > create mode 100644 arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h > > create mode 100644 arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h > > create mode 100644 arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/signal.h > > create mode 100644 arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/swab.h > > create mode 100644 arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h > > In the introductory mail, you mention that you have a new toolchain. > I assume this implies that all existing user space binaries are > incompatible with new kernels. If so, I would like to ask you > to use the generic ABI where possible. In particular, using > asm-generic/unistd.h to get the default system call table that > is now shared across all new architectures, but > asm-generic/signal.h also looks like it could be used here > and asm-generic/swab.h might work but depends on performance > considerations. > Hmm... I think old ABI compatibility is not needed. Because toolchain not have compatibility. unistd.h is agree. signal.h and swab.h is considered. > Arnd > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Yoshinori Sato <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
