Re: [PATCH 30/38] s390: drop pte_file()-related helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 11:07:27AM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2014 14:22:38 +0200
> "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > We've replaced remap_file_pages(2) implementation with emulation.
> > Nobody creates non-linear mapping anymore.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > @@ -279,7 +279,6 @@ static inline int is_module_addr(void *addr)
> >   *
> >   * pte_present is true for the bit pattern .xx...xxxxx1, (pte & 0x001) == 0x001
> >   * pte_none    is true for the bit pattern .10...xxxx00, (pte & 0x603) == 0x400
> > - * pte_file    is true for the bit pattern .11...xxxxx0, (pte & 0x601) == 0x600
> >   * pte_swap    is true for the bit pattern .10...xxxx10, (pte & 0x603) == 0x402
> >   */
>  
> Nice, once this is upstream I can free up one of the software bits in
> the pte by redefining the type bits. Right now all of them are used up.
> Is the removal of non-linear mappings a done deal ?

Yes, if no horrible regression will be reported. We don't create
non-linear mapping in -mm (and -next) tree for a few release cycles.
Nobody complained so far.

Ack?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux