Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] h8300: Process and signal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Yoshinori Sato
<ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +       usig = current_thread_info()->exec_domain
> +               && current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap
> +               && sig < 32
> +               ? current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap[sig]
> +               : sig;

Does h8300 really need signal mapping?
I'm very sure you can drop this.
In fact I'm working in patch set to rip it out tree wide as we have
only a single (broken)
in-tree user.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux