Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] h8300: Process and signal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:38:25 +0100,
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Yoshinori Sato
> <ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +       usig = current_thread_info()->exec_domain
> > +               && current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap
> > +               && sig < 32
> > +               ? current_thread_info()->exec_domain->signal_invmap[sig]
> > +               : sig;
> 
> Does h8300 really need signal mapping?
> I'm very sure you can drop this.
> In fact I'm working in patch set to rip it out tree wide as we have
> only a single (broken)
> in-tree user.
>

I agree.
It remove forgot.

> -- 
> Thanks,
> //richard

-- 
Yoshinori Sato
<ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux